Analysis of Geometry Reasoning of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education Students Reviewed from Van Hiele's Geometry



Authors (s)


(1) * Puspita Maya Margaretha   (Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Huda Kapongan Situbondo)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Students in college tend to be active in organizations. Student abilities in terms of academics are one of the benchmarks in the development of students' emotions in organizations. The topic of this article in terms of academic students is geometry ability which focuses on PGMI students at the STAI Nurul Huda Kapongan campus. To determine the existence of geometry levels, students are given a van Hiele geometry test sheet consisting of 25 multiple-choice questions. Leveling is done in stages. Students must pass the first 5 questions to get level 0, with students must be able to answer at least 3 questions correctly for the first 5 questions. The next 5 questions can be said to be passed if the previous 5 questions have been able to. Van Hiele geometry leveling consists of 5 levels. Level 0 is visualization, level 1 is analysis, level 2 is informal deduction, level 3 is deduction, level 4 is rigor. The researcher also compiled a geometric reasoning test sheet with 7 indicators. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the geometric reasoning ability of PGMI students at the STAI Nurul Huda Kapongan campus is reviewed from van Hiele's theory. A geometry ability test was administered to all 70 students. Students were grouped based on their geometry level. The results of the geometric reasoning test were analyzed and described based on the students' geometry level.




Full Text: PDF



References


Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2021). Blockchain in education management: present and future applications. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1-17.

Marbun, D. S., Effendi, S., Lubis, H. Z., & Pratama, I. (2020). Role of education management to expediate supply chain management: a case of Indonesian Higher Educational Institutions. International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM), 9(1), 89-96.

Sergi, B. S. (2019). Tech, smart cities, and regional development in contemporary Russia (p. 229). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Pohan, S., & Sirait, F. Y. (2021, February). The Strategy Of Principal In The Implementation Of Character Education In Smp Muhammadiyah 1 Medan. In Proceeding International Seminar Of Islamic Studies (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 242-248).

Afgani, D.J. 2011. Analisis Kurikulum Matematika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Alexander, P.A.&Buehl, M.M. 2004 . Seeing The Posibilities: Constructing and Validating Measures of Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning for Young Children. Dalam L.D English, (Ed.) Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning of Young Learners.(pp 23-46) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties. A.K. Barbey, & L.W. Barsalou. 2009. Teaching and Learning Mathematics (in secondary school), Duuque lowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Arikunto. 2000. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto. 2011. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Basrowi dan Suwandi. 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Palm, T., et al. 2014. Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enactedcurriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 72–87.

Brodie, Karin. 2010. Teaching Mathematical Reasoning in Secondary School Clasrooms. London:Springer.

BSNP. 2006. Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Burger, William F. & Shaughnessy, J. Michael. 1986. Characterizing The van Hile Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 17 (1):31-48. Reston:NCTM.

Copi, Irving M. 1978. Introduction to Logic. New York: Mcmillan Publishing Co, Inc.

Danim, Sudarwan. 2002. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Darmadi, Hamid. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabetha. English, Lyn. 2004 . Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners.

Goldstein,E.B. 2011. Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research, And Everyday Experience. Belmont: Wadworth.

Hamdani, Asep Saeful. 2008. Penggabungan Taksonomi. Kumpulan Makalah Seminar Pendidikan Nasional.

Haviger, J., & Vojkuvkova, I. 2015. The van Hiele Levels at Czech Secondary Schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 912–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.209

Herlambang. 2013. Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Kelas VII-A SMP Negeri 1 Kepahiang tentang Bangun Datar Ditinjau dari Teori van Hiele. Tesis. Bengkulu.: Universitas Bengkulu.

Jonsson,Bert. 2014. Learning Mathematics through Algorithmic and Creative Reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 36:20-32.

Kartono. 2012. Hands On Activity pada Pembelajaran Geometri Sekolah sebagai Penilaian Kinerja Siswa. Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNNES.

Klipatrict, J. , Swafford, J. 2002. Helping Children Learn Mathematics.

Washington: National Academy Press.

Klipatrict, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. 2001 . Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington:National Academy Press.

Lithner, J. 2006. A Research Framework for Creative and Imitative Reasoning.

Jurnal Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Margaretha, Puspita Maya. 2018. Profil Kemampuan Geometri Siswa ditinjau dari Teori Van Hiele. Thesis. Digital Repository Universitas Jember.

Mistretta, Regina M. 2009. Enhancing Geometric Reasoning. (online) http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_138_35/ai_66171011/pg_6/?ta g=content;col1 [diakses 26 Oktober 2017]

Moleong Lexy J. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution. 1988. Metode Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Niss, M. 2007. Reactions on the state and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning. From here to Utopia. In F. Lester (Ed.), 2nd handbookof research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293– 1312).

Priatna, N. 2003. Kemampuan Penalaran dan Pemahaman Matematika Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama Negeri di Kota bandung. Disertasi Doktor pada PPS IKIP Bandung Press: Tidak Diterbitkan.

Puspita Maya Margaretha. 2019. Profil Kemampuan Geometri Siswa ditinjau dari Teori Van Hiele.

Rahmawati. 2016. Seminar Hasil TIMSS 2015.

Released Mathematic Items. TIMSS USA GRADE 8: USA. Reys.et.al. 2014 . Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Aptara.inc. Slameto. 1999. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Susanto. 2010. Proses Berpikir Siswa Tunanetra dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Diterbitkan. Disertasi. Surabaya: Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Universitas Jember. 2012. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Edisi Ketiga.

Jember: Jember University Press.

Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L. 2014. Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 10–16.

Wright, Jim . 2002. Lesson 2: How to Give Compliments to Tutees.

Yudhawati, Ratna dan Haryanto, Dany. 2011. Teori-Teori Dasar Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustaka Raya.

Yilmaz, G. K., Koparan, T. & Hanci, A. 2016. Determination of the relationship between 8th grade students learning styles and TIMSS mathematics achievement. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 11, 35-58.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Education Management and Policy
Published by Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.
 
Adress : PO BOX 1 Tanjung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java