Golden Triangle-Based Digital Learning Facility Management Model (Technology, People, Process)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jumpa.v6i1.14930
Authors

(1) * Syukri Indra   (Universitas Djuanda)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Zahra Khusnul Lathifah   (Universitas Djuanda)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Abdul Kholik   (Universitas Djuanda)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed educational practices, requiring institutions to adopt effective digital learning systems. However, significant challenges remain, particularly in Islamic educational institutions, where limitations in technological readiness, human resource capacity, and management processes hinder optimal implementation. This study addresses the lack of an integrated framework by examining digital learning management through the golden triangle model, which consists of technology, people, and process. Using a qualitative multi-case study approach, this research was conducted in two Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Bogor City. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field findings, and documentation, and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model supported by NVivo. The findings reveal that effective digital learning management is achieved through the synergy of three key components. The technology component includes blended learning, online learning, and classroom-based digital tools that support flexible learning environments. The people component highlights the collaborative roles of stakeholders, including school leaders, teachers, IT personnel, students, parents, and government institutions. Meanwhile, the process component reflects a structured managerial cycle involving policy, planning, organizing, implementation, and supervision supported by adequate infrastructure. Cross-case analysis indicates consistent implementation patterns across both research sites. These findings imply that successful digital learning in madrasah education requires a balanced and integrated management approach rather than isolated improvements in individual components. The study provides a conceptual and practical framework that can guide policymakers, school leaders, and educators in strengthening digital learning systems. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of aligning technological innovation with organizational capacity and educational values, particularly in the context of Islamic education, to ensure sustainable and effective digital transformation.


Keywords

Golden Triangle, Learning Facilities, Learning Management, Digital Learning



Full Text: PDF



References


Akter, & Bhuiyan. (2025). Dropout Rate in Online Education during COVID-19: A Study of University Students in Bangladesh. ASEAN Journal of Open and Distance Learning. https://doi.org/10.64233/dhru2556

Christou, P. A. (2025). Looking Beyond Numbers in Qualitative Research: From Data Saturation to Data Analysis. Qualitative Report, 30(1), 3088–3100. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2025.7560

Dhrubo, A. M. (2025). Integrating the Resource-Based View with Integral Theory: Toward a Holistic Typology of Organizational Resources. Philosophy of Management, 24(3), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-025-00340-8

Khoirohnissah, D. (2023). Digital Transformation in Indonesian Religious Education: A Case Study of Madrasah Management at Kemenag Sleman. Journal of Islamic Education Management Research, 1(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiemr.2023.12-10

Goodman, A., & Manning, E. (2022). Social Dreaming: Fabulating Ecologies. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(5), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211065799

Hamdanah, H. (2025). Digital Islamic Education Management: Elementary School Principals’ Strategies in Technology-Based Learning and Administration Transformation. Auladuna: Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(02), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.62097/ad.v7i02.2713

Handayani, L. (2024). Critical Review of Technology-Based Education Supervision Models: Implications for Improving The Quality of Learning in The Digital Age. JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran), 31(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.17977/jpp.v31i1.50923

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2022). Examining Effects of Instructional Strategies on Student Engagement in Blended Online Courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1657–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12701

Hughes, J., Homan, L., O’Reilly, M., & Hughes, K. (2025). AI Voice Methodology: Using Generative AI in Qualitative Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251401842

Jia, L. (2022). Evaluation and Integration of ICT Using Music Software in Music Education. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.1.2.2022

Laari, L. (2025). Inductive-Deductive Qualitative Data Analysis Logic in Health Sciences Research: A Framework for Analysing Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251381706

Lee, J. (2025). How Does Qualitative Research Secure Social Scientific Value?: Debates on Its Credibility and External Validity and Their Implications. Korean Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.21562/kjs.2025.05.59.2.1

Lejeune, C. (2024). Ce que l’informatique fait à l’analyse qualitative. L’histoire croisée des CAQDAS et de Cassandre. Recherches Qualitatives, 42(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.7202/1108606ar

Li, W. (2025). Research on the Impact of Blended Learning on Student Growth and Teacher Development under the Digital Transformation of Higher Education Management. Journal of Higher Education Research, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v6i1.3631

Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008

Marwan, M., & Deviyantoro, D. (2025). Unlocking Excellence: The Impact of Teacher Competence on Learning and Leadership. Digital Innovation: International Journal of Management, 2(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v2i2.325

Morgan, H. (2024). Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous. Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Niedbalski, J., & Ślęzak, I. (2022). Encounters with CAQDAS: Advice for Beginner Users of Computer Software for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report, 27(4), 1114–1132. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4770

Onan, G. (2024). A Qualitative Study on Digital Transformation and Digital Leadership in Higher Education. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS). https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.1587587

Özdemir, A., Tekin, A., & Saraçoğlu, Y. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Digital Transformation and Education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 1078–1095. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1331297

Paulus Santibáñez, N., & Duhalde Valenzuela, B. (2025). CAQDAS and Artificial Intelligence: New Challenges and Possibilities for Teaching Qualitative Data Coding. Spirat: Revista Académica de Docencia y Gestión Universitaria, 3(NE1), e5579. https://doi.org/10.20453/spirat.v3ine1.5579

Perez, N. (2024). n-Sizes, Attributes, and A Priori Sampling: A Qualitative Sampling Model for Large, Heterogeneous Populations. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14895

Polukhina, E. (2022). Ethnographic Case-Study Design for Discovering Identities in Russian PostIndustrial Neighbourhoods. Qualitative Report, 27(5), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5381

Quadir, B., & Zhou, M. (2021). Students Perceptions, System Characteristics and Online Learning during the COVID-19 Epidemic School Disruption. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210401.oa1

Santhuenkaew, T. (2025). Technology to Learning for Educational Research in Digital Transformation. Journal of Industrial Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.55003/jie.24102

Shrestha, P., & Bhattarai, P. (2022). Application of Case Study Methodology in the Exploration of Inclusion in Education. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11461

Supa’at, S., Munir, M. M., & Rizqi, F. N. L. (2025). The Challenge of Madrasah in Facing the VUCA Era (The Readiness of Islamic Madrasah Education System in Facing Digital Era). International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 5(2), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v5i2.373

Illananingtyas, T. (2021). Online-Based Distance Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic at Primary School. EL Bidayah: Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, 3(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.33367/jiee.v3i2.1946

Thongphukdee, L., Thongphukdee, C., & Prongprommarat, J. (2024). Development of a Supervision Model to Enhance Competency in Educational Quality Assurance among Academic Institution Administrators. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i10.7766

Waghorn, E., & Yelland, N. (2024). Researching Children’s Lifeworlds through an Innovative Case Study Methodology. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2024-0169

Wahidah, F. R., Wan, G., & Wulandari, D. A. (2022). How Does ICT Integration Perception in Kindergarten Teachers in Banyumas, Indonesia? Education, Sustainability & Society, 5(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.01.2022.32.35

Zhang, L. (2021). Research on Chinese Contemporary Social Life. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(8–9), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211021808


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jumpa.v6i1.14930


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Syukri Indra, Zahra Khusnul Lathifah, Abdul Kholik


Published By
Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) Universitas Nurul Jadid
Jl. PP. Nurul Jadid, Karanganyar Paiton Probolinggo Jawa Timur 67291, Indonesia

License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0


© 2026 Jumpa: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan | Universitas Nurul Jadid