Reframing Learning Quality in Higher Education: A TQM-Based Approach in Research and Evaluation Courses

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jumpa.v7i1.15138
Authors

(1) * Wahyudin Rajab   (Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Jakarta III)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Aan Nurhasanah   (Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Jakarta III)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Nana Mulyana   (Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Jakarta III)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Andi Sari Bunga Untung   (Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Jakarta III)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Safrudin Safrudin   (Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Jakarta III)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examines how Total Quality Management (TQM) is implemented within the learning process of the Research and Educational Evaluation (PEP) course and how it influences learning quality in higher education. The study responds to ongoing concerns regarding the limited effectiveness of conventional teaching approaches in developing students’ analytical and research competencies. A qualitative case study design was employed, involving 40 participants including lecturers, students, quality assurance representatives, technical staff, and alumni. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field findings, and document analysis, and analyzed using a thematic approach based on the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. The findings reveal that the implementation of TQM led to noticeable changes in learning design, instructional practices, and feedback mechanisms. Learning became more participatory, with students actively engaged in research-related tasks and practical activities. The involvement of multiple stakeholders also contributed to a more responsive learning environment, forming what can be understood as a learning ecosystem. At the same time, these improvements were accompanied by challenges, particularly increased workload and the need for adaptation among students and lecturers. These results suggest that improving learning quality requires not only structured frameworks but also continuous interaction and support across stakeholders. The study highlights the importance of viewing quality management as a process embedded in everyday learning practices rather than as a purely administrative system.


Keywords

Total Quality Management, Learning Quality, Higher Education, Stakeholder Engagement



Full Text: PDF



References


Ali, K., & Waheed, A. (2025). Synergistic Role of TQM 4.0 Toward Industry 4.0 Readiness: A Sociotechnical Perspective of Selected Industries. TQM Journal, 37(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2023-0249

Alkhateeb, H., & Romanowski, M. H. (2021). Identifying Administrators’ and Faculty’s Perspectives Regarding CAEP Accreditation in a College of Education: A Q Methodology Research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101004

Arja, S. B., White, B. A., Fayyaz, J., & Thompson, A. (2024). The Impact of Accreditation on Continuous Quality Improvement Process in Undergraduate Medical Education Programs: A Scoping Review. MedEdPublish, 14, 13. https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20142.2

Biddix, J. P. (2025). Visual Models, Piloting, and Triangulation as Core Formative Research Practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2585271

Cassia, F., Castellani, P., Rossato, C., & Baccarani, C. (2021). Finding a Way Towards High-Quality, Accessible Tourism: The Role of Digital Ecosystems. TQM Journal, 33(1), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2020-0062

Currenti, B., & Letheren, K. (2025). Roll for Intelligence: Imaginal Serious Games and Student Learning Outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251387030

Ferrè, F. (2023). Exploring How to Trigger the Use of Patient-Reported Information for Quality Improvement in Multi-Stakeholder Governance. TQM Journal, 36(9), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2023-0236

Hagemann, V., & Decius, J. (2024). Does Feedback Type Matter? The Superiority of Process Feedback over Performance Feedback in Interdependent Teamwork. Learning and Instruction, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101949

Hill, J., & Smith, K. (2023). Visions of Blended Learning: Identifying the Challenges and Opportunities in Shaping Institutional Approaches to Blended Learning in Higher Education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2176916

Ikram, M., Saleem, S. M. U., & Mehmood, W. (2025). Integrating Education Quality and Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. TQM Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2024-0291

Jasti, N. V. K., Venkateswaran, V., & Kota, S. (2022). Total Quality Management in Higher Education: A Literature Review on Barriers, Customers and Accreditation. TQM Journal, 34(5), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0256

Jasti, N. V. K., Venkateswaran, V., Kota, S., & Sangwan, K. S. (2022). A Literature Review on Total Quality Management (Models, Frameworks, and Tools and Techniques) in Higher Education. TQM Journal, 34(5), 1298–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2021-0113

Johnston, O. (2025). Evaluating Impact of Educational Research on Teachers’ Practice: A Teacher Expectations Intervention. Educational Research and Evaluation, 30(7–8), 766–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2025.2570178

Koehler, A. A., & Meech, S. (2022). Ungrading Learner Participation in a Student-Centered Learning Experience. TechTrends, 66(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00682-w

McNaughton, S. (2021). The Conundrum Research-Practice Partnerships Face with System Variability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101048

Morgan, H. (2024). Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous. Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Park, J. (2025). Incorporating Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for International Students in UK Higher Education: Challenges and Perspectives. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 36. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi36.1506

Perveen, U., Idris, M. I., & Zaman, A. Z. (2021). The Impact of Accreditation on the Improvement of Teacher Education Programs/Institutions in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v8i1.518

Shadiev, R., Liu, J., & Yang, L. (2025). The Effect of Evaluation and Feedback in 360-Degree Video-Based VR Environments on Language Learning Outcomes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(7), 1561–1591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2300990

Skovlund, P. C., Finderup, J., Aabo, S., Jensen, F., Søndergaard, H., & Rodkjær, L. Ø. (2024). Recommendations for Successful Involvement of Patient Partners in Complex Intervention Research: A Collaborative Learning Process. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00533-3

Snyder, M. M., Kramer, S., Lippe, D., & Sankar, S. (2023). Design and Implementation of 360-Degree Video Vignettes in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Quality Management in Higher Education Case. Qualitative Report, 28(7), 2113–2155. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6140

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ranjbar, N. (2021). EAP Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: From Theory to Practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101042

Sravat, N., & Pathranarakul, P. (2022). Flipped Learning Pedagogy: Modelling the Challenges for Higher Education in India. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2022.121137

Supriyanto, A., Burhanuddin, B., Sunarni, S., Rochmawati, R., Ratri, D. K., & Bhayangkara, A. N. (2025). Academic Service Quality, Student Satisfaction and Loyalty: A Study at Higher Education Legal Entities in Indonesia. TQM Journal, 37(5), 1364–1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2023-0334

Vihari, N. S., Yadav, M., & Panda, T. K. (2022). Impact of Soft TQM Practices on Employee Work Role Performance: Role of Innovative Work Behaviour and Initiative Climate. TQM Journal, 34(1), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2021-0092

Wang, W. S., Lin, C. J., Lee, H. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2025). Integrating Feedback Mechanisms and ChatGPT for VR-Based Experiential Learning: Impacts on Reflective Thinking and AIoT Physical Hands-On Tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1770–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2375644

Xhomara, N., & Dasho, A. (2023). Online Interactions and Student Learning Outcomes in a Moodle-Based E-Learning System. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2214576

Yan, D. (2024). Comparing Individual vs. Collaborative Processing of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback: Effects on L2 Writing Task Improvement and Learning. Language Learning and Technology, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73597

Yildiz Durak, H. (2024). Feedforward- or Feedback-Based Group Regulation Guidance in Collaborative Groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12887

Yusuf, F. A. (2023). Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality of Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16210a


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jumpa.v7i1.15138


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyudin Rajab, Aan Nurhasanah, Nana Mulyana, Andi Sari Bunga Untung, Safrudin


Published By
Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) Universitas Nurul Jadid
Jl. PP. Nurul Jadid, Karanganyar Paiton Probolinggo Jawa Timur 67291, Indonesia

License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0


© 2026 Jumpa: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan | Universitas Nurul Jadid