Menakar Potensi Sosiologi Hukum sebagai Pendekatan Perdamaian: Pembacaan dari Perspektif Strukturasi Giddens
AbstractPositivistic legal approach still become dominant paradigm in the process of law enforcement. The dominance of the paradigm is also seen in the conflict resolution and peacebuilding process. Positive law is considered as the most effective instrument in overcoming conflict and tension. Unfortunately, its repressive nature making this approach also full of criticism.Such as its disregard of for the local norms as the living laws in society. This study of sociology of law as an approach in the peace process is aimed to fill the gap. Compared to the positivistic paradigm, the sociology of law is lack of popularity. The level of jurist acceptance of the sociology of law was also same. Along with the many criticism of the positivistic paradigm as it often gave rise to the gap between ideality of positive law and living law, the popularity of sociology of law also began to rise. However, in the sense of peacebuilding, the sociological approach of law remains a novelty. This literature study analysed conceptually on how the sociology of law is applied to the local based peacebuilding. The strong emphasis on the local habit and norm as living law become a meeting point between the sociology of law and local based peacebuilding. In addition, to explain how local individuals act as an empowered agent in accordance with living law, this study utilized Giddens' theory of Structuration. Keywords: Living law, Peacebuilding, Local, Agent. |
Full Text:
References
Braithwaite, J., 2002. Rules and Principles: a Theory of Legal Certainty, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 47-82
Cotterrel, R. 2012. Sosiologi Hukum. Bali: Nusa Dua
Craib, I. 1992. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge
Friedman, L. 2011. Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media
Giddens, A. 1984.The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press
Ginty, R. Mac. (2014). Everyday peace : Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614550899.
Hardiman, F.B. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif.Yogyakarta : Kanisius
Kritz, N., 2007,The Rule of Law in Conflict Management?, in Crocker, C., F.O. Hampson, and
P. All (eds.), Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, pp. 401-424
Mona Lilja & Stellan Vinthagen (2014) Sovereign power, disciplinary power and biopower: resisting what power with what resistance?, Journal of Political Power, 7:1, 107-126, DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2014.889403
Munch, R. 2007. American and European Forms of Social Theory reflecting social practice dalam Gessner, V & Nelken, D (eds). European Ways of Law: Toward a European Sociology of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing
Priyono, B.H. 2002.Anthony Giddens : Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta : Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia
Rahardjo, S., 2006. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta : Kompas Media
Richmond, O. P. (2010). Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace, 38(3), 665–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810365017.
Ritzer, G. 2012.Teori Sosiologi : Dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern.Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Sumner, G.W. 1906. Folkways.Manners & Customs.
Sumner, W.G. 1906. Folkways: a Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores and Morals. New York: New American Library
Tretyakov S. The Concept of Legal Coercion and Power-Conferring Legal Regimes.Russian Law Journal. 2017;5(1):33-56. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-1-33-56
Trevino, J., 2017. The Sociology of Law: Classical and Contemporary Perspective. New York: Routledge
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society. California: University of California Press
Wignjosoebroto, S. 2013. Hukum dalam Masyarakat, ed. 2. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
10.33650/lsj.v1i1.2024 |
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Dodik Harnadi