Nurses’ Knowledge and Compliance with Intravenous Insertion Standard Operating Procedures in Emergency Care Settings
DOI : 10.33650/ahnj.v2i2.13884
Background: The emergency department is the main entry point for hospital services and plays a crucial role in providing immediate patient care. Intravenous insertion is a common invasive procedure that may contribute to nosocomial infections if standard operating procedures (SOPs) are not properly followed. Nurses’ compliance with SOPs is therefore essential for infection prevention and patient safety. Objective: This study aimed to examine the relationship between nurses’ knowledge levels and compliance with intravenous insertion standard operating procedures in emergency care settings. Methods: A correlational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in January 2016. The study involved all nurses working in the emergency department, with a total of 18 participants selected using total sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires to assess knowledge and observational checklists to evaluate compliance. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s rho test with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05). Results: The analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between nurses’ knowledge levels and compliance with intravenous insertion SOPs (p = 0.001), indicating that higher knowledge levels were associated with better compliance. Conclusion: Nurses’ knowledge is a key determinant of compliance with intravenous insertion SOPs and plays an important role in preventing nosocomial infections in emergency care settings.
Keywords : Nurses’ knowledge; Compliance; Standard operating procedures; Intravenous insertion; Emergency department; Nosocomial infection
- Atay, S., Sen, S., & Cukurlu, D. (2018). Phlebitis-related peripheral venous catheterization and the associated risk factors. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 21(6), 827–831. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_337_17
- Cicolini, G., Manzoli, L., Simonetti, V., Flacco, M. E., Comparcini, D., Capasso, L., Di Mascio, R., & Prospero, E. (2014). Phlebitis risk varies by peripheral venous catheter site and increases after 96 hours. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(11), 2539–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12403
- Hasan, Z., & Sholehah, B. (2023). Efektitfitas Aplikasi Cim-Z terhadap Kepuasan Perawat dalam Mengontrol Infus di RS Elizabeth Situbondo. TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.33650/trilogi.v4i3.6731
- Helm, R. E., Klausner, J. D., Klemperer, J. D., Flint, L. M., & Huang, E. (2015). Accepted but unacceptable: Peripheral IV catheter failure. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 38(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000100
- Lee, S., Kim, K., & Kim, J. S. (2019). A model of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters in orthopedic inpatients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183412
- Lulie, M., Tadesse, A., Tsegaye, T., Yesuf, T., & Silamsaw, M. (2021). Incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter phlebitis and its associated factors among patients admitted to University of Gondar hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A prospective observational study. Thrombosis Journal, 19, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00324-1
- Miliani, K., Taravella, R., Thillard, D., Chauvin, V., Martin, E., Edouard, S., Bénet, T., & Astagneau, P. (2017). Peripheral venous catheter–related adverse events: Evaluation from a multicentre epidemiological study in France (CATHEVAL project, 2010–2011). PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0168637–e0168637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168637
- O’Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., Raad, I. I., Randolph, A. G., Rupp, M. E., & Saint, S. (2011). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(9), e162–e193. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257
- Osei-Tutu, E., Tuoyire, D. A., Debrah, S., & Ayetey, H. (2015). Peripheral intravenous cannulation and phlebitis risk at Cape Coast Teaching Hospital. Postgraduate Medical Journal of Ghana, 4(1), 11–18.
- Roca, G. M., Bertolo, C. B., López, P. T., Galleymore, P. R., Grau, R. N., & Campins, M. M. (2012). Assessing the influence of risk factors on rates and dynamics of peripheral vein phlebitis: An observational study. Medicina Clínica, 139(5), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2011.12.021
- Sholehah, B. (2025). Nurse Clinical Decision-Making in Head Injury Patients. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing, 17(02), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2025.v17i02.005
- Simin, D., Milutinović, D., Turkulov, V., & Brkić, S. (2019). Incidence, severity and risk factors of peripheral intravenous cannula-induced complications: An observational prospective study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9–10), 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14760
- Tan, F., Wu, H., Nie, L., Li, W., & Li, L. (2020). Risk factors for phlebitis in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters. Global Journal of Health Science, 12(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v12n1p41
- Webster, J., Osborne, S., Rickard, C. M., & New, K. (2019). Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(1), CD007798–CD007798. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub5
- WHO. (2023). Global report on infection prevention and control. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications
- Zhang, J., & Lv, L. (2020). The incidence and risk of infusion phlebitis with peripheral intravenous catheters: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vascular Access, 21(3), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729819877323