CHALLENGES OF AL ISLAM AND KEMUHAMMADIYAHAN (AIK) LEARNING WITH BAITUL ARQAM MODEL

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v5i1.1644

Authors (s)


(1) * Tri Santoso   (Islamic Educational Management Department, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Central Java)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Giyoto Giyoto   (Islamic Educational Management Department, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Central Java)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Baidi Baidi   (Islamic Educational Management Department, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Central Java)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Hari Kusmanto   (Indonesian Language Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Central Java)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to describe the implementation of AIK learning program with the Baitul Arqam model at the Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta in the 2019/2020 year. This study employed a qualitative approach to research. In collecting data, this study used observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation techniques, while the data validation was a triangulation of data sources and theories. This study's data analysis applied a CIPP Stufflebeam analysis. The results showed that (1) evaluating the AIK learning program with the Baitul Arqam model can be stated quite well in planning, organization, and implementation. The evaluation results on the supervision aspect of AIK learning program within the Baitul Arqam model can be unfavorable. Supervision was carried out only when students follow Baitul Arqam. Maintenance carried out after following the AIK learning with the Baitul Arqam model was not held. (2) The challenges faced by the AIK learning program with the Baitul Arqam model included: (a) the need for strategic planning, (b) qualified educators based on the standards, (c) a campus environment, and (d) an integrated supervision model.


Keywords

Baitul Arqam, Management, Evaluation, CIPP



Full Text: PDF



References


Abrori, H. (2018). Inspiring Leadership dan Transformasi Kelembagaan Menuju Perguruan Tinggi Islam yang Unggul. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–22.

Connolly, M., James, C., & Fertig, M. (2019). The Difference between Educational Management and Educational Leadership and The Importance of academic Responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 504–519.

Corey, G. (2013). Teori dan Praktek: Konseling & Psikoterapi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Flick, U., Steinke, I., & Kardoff, E. (2017). Buku Induk Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma, Teori, Metode, Prosedur, dan Praktik. Cantrik Pustaka: Yogyakarta.

Graue, C. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Sales, Retailing & Marketing, 4(9), 5–14.

Irianto, S. (2012). Otonomi Perguruan Tinggi: Suatu Keniscayaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Jiao, L., & Deng, S. (2019). Research on Prominent Problem and Solution of Educational Management in Colleges and Universities Against the New Era Background. 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2019), 946-948.

Junanto, S., & Kusna, N. A. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran di PAUD Inklusi dengan Model Context, Input, Process, adn Product (CIPP). Inklusi Journal Disability Studies, 5(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.050202

Khikmah, N. (2020). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana untuk Mengembangkan Mutu Pendidikan. JAMP: Jurnal Adminitrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 14-21.

Kurniawati, P. I., & Sayuti, S. A. (2013). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana di SMK N 1 Kasihan Bantul. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 98–108.

Lyngdoh, L., & Dhaliwal, R. K. (2018). Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in Agriculture. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 54(4), 54–58.

Magdalena, I., Rosnaningsih, A., Akbar, M., & Situmorang, R. (2020). Evaluasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar Wilayah Kota dan Kabupaten Tangerang. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 230–248.

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 111–125.

McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. (2018). Program Evaluation and performance Measurement: An introduction to The Practice. California: Sage Publications.

Miswanto. (2016). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Pesantren Mini di Madrasah Aliyaah Patra Mandiri Plaju Palembang. Jurnal of Islamic Education Management, 2(2), 86–104.

Muhtarom, A. (2015). Implementasi Manajamen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Peningkatan Profesionalitas Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam Provinsi Banten. Tarbawi, 1(2), 117–130.

Mulyatiningsih, E., & Nuryanto, A. (2014). Metode penelitian Terapan bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Mutakin, T. Z., Nurhayati, & Rusmana, I. M. (2014). Penerapan Teori Pembiasaan dalam Pembentukan Karakter Religi Siswa di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Edutech, 1(3), 361–373.

Muyasaroh, & Sutrisno. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi CIPP pada Program Pembelajaran Tahfiz Al-qur’an di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233.

Norton, A. (2014). Mapping Australian Higher Education. Victoria: Grattan Institute.

Refita, Y., Siregar, H., & Imam, S. A. (2017). Evaluasi Program Sarjana Membangun Desa ( SMD ) dan Strategi Pengembangannya ( Studi Kasus Provinsi Sumatera Barat , Jawa Barat dan Nusa Tenggara Barat ). Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 1(1), 98–113.

Rochmawati, U., Timan, A., & Kusumaningrum, D. E. (2019). Manajemen Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keahlian Ganda Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. JAMP: Jurnal Adminitrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(3), 147–155.

Romdloni. (2017). Manajemen Personalia Sebagai Upaya dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Personalia di Madrasah. Evaluasi, 1(1), 69–84.

Siswanto, H. B. (2016). Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Stoner, J. A. F., & Wankel, C. (1988). Manajemen. Jakarta: Intermedia.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley.

Sugiyono, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Penelitian yang Bersifat: Eksploratif, Enterpretif, Interaktif dan Konstruktif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Syam, A. R. (2017). Posisi Manajemen Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan. Muaddib: Studi Kependidikan dan Keislaman, 7(01), 33–46.

Syamsuddin. (2017). Penerpan Fungsi-Fungsi Manajemen dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Idaarah, 1(1), 3–4.

Terry, G. R., & Rue, L. W. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Toro, J., Requena, I., Duarte, O., & Zamorano, M. (2013). A Qualitative Method Proposal to Improve Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 9–20.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wulogening, H. I., & Timan, A. (2020). Implementasi Total Quality Management ( TQM ) dalam Sistem Manajemen Perencanaan Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 137–146.

Zurqoni, Z., Retnawati, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2019). Impact of Character Education Implementation: a Goal-Free Evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.881


Article View

Abstract views : 61 times | PDF files viewed : 37 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/al-tanzim.v5i1.1644


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Tri Santoso

Creative Commons License
 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Al-Tanzim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam
Published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.