Authors (s)

(1) * Agus Purwowidodo   (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung)  
(2)  Muhamad Yasin   (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri)
(*) Corresponding Author


The study describes and analyzes the use of corporate marketing communication strategies towards Higher Education at the international level. This study used a qualitative descriptive method, with the research site at IAIN Tulungagung. The research subjects are members of the academic community, teaching staff, education staff and stakeholders. The research period was for the 2018/2019 academic year. The results showed that the typology of the marketing or promotion model used collaboration between internal parties (academics, stakeholders) and external parties (institutions, channel partners, media, government, industrial bodies and institutions, the educational community and the general public). Its implementation uses corporate advertising, sponsorship, sales presentations, online activities, branding, corporate advertising, press releases, press conferences, events, and awards. The study implications deal with the increase in: (1) Higher Education Identity, Image, Reputation; (2) Higher Education Social Responsibility (CSR); (3) media relation effectiveness; (4) more efficient marketing communications; (5) the more intensive Internal Communication System; (6) investor relation improvement; (7) conducive relations with the Government, and (8) the reliability in overcoming crisis communication. These have an impact on improving the quality of IAIN Tulungagung toward the level of International Higher Education.


Branding, Communication, Marketing, University

Full Text: PDF


Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we Know and Don’t Know about Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.

Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223-1252.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.

Einwiller, S., Viererbl, B., & Himmelreich, S. (2017). Journalists’ Coverage of Online Firestorms in German-Language News Media. Journalism Practice, 11(9), 1178-1197.

Elving, W. J., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A., & Thomson, C. (2015). The Bad, The Ugly and The Good: New Challenges for CSR Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2(2), 118-127.

Etter, M. (2013). Reasons for Low Levels of Interactivity: Non Interactive CSR Communication in Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 606-608.

Hutami, R. R. F. (2011). Research University sebagai Langkah Awal Menuju World Class University. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 11(3), 162-171.

Permana, V. A. (2012). Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan dan Karakteristik Perusahaan terhadap CSR Disclosure: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1(2), 1-12.

Poerwandari, E. K. (2017). Qualitative Approach to Human Behavior Research. Jakarta: LPSP3 Universitas Indonesia.

Sondoh, S. L., Omar, M. W., Wahid, N. A., Ismail, I., & Harun, A. (2007). The Effect of Brand Image on Overall Satisfaction and Loyalty Intention in The Context of Color Cosmetic. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 12(1), 83-107.

Saputri, A., Hudayah, S., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Pengaruh Customer Relationship Management dan Kualitas Layanan terhadap Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan Media Advertising di Samarinda. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 7(2), 114-119.

Cho, M., Furey, L. D., & Mohr, T. (2017). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on Social Media: Strategies, Stakeholders, and Public Engagement on Corporate Facebook. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 52-69.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworldand System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mittelman, J. H. (2017). Implausible Dream: The World-class University and Repurposing Higher Education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Agung, I., & Santosa, A. (2017). Dinamika LPTK menuju Perguruan Tinggi Kelas Dunia (World Class University/WCU). Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 31(1), 43-54.

Chen, S. (2009). Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-enabled Social Networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 523-536.

Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., & Simar, L. (2015). Rankings and University Performance: A Conditional Multidimensional Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 918-930.

Heath, R. L., & Coombs, W. T. (2006). Today's Public Relations: An Introduction. California: Sage.

Reid, M., Luxton, S., & Mavondo, F. (2005). The Relationship Between Integrated Marketing Communication, Market Orientation, and Brand Orientation. Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 11-23.

Article View

Abstract views : 575 times | PDF files viewed : 361 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Muhamad Yasin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Al-Tanzim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam
Published by Postgraduate of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.