Acceptance of Distance Learning Technology in Technology-Based Learning Management
AbstractThe Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) describes the factors that influence the acceptance and adoption of technology by individuals. In education management, TAM is used to understand how educators, students, and administrative staff respond to the use of technology in the educational process. The application of the Technology Acceptance Model in education management is to help educational institutions plan, implement, and support the use of technology more effectively, taking into account psychological factors and user perceptions. The variables influencing technology acceptance are Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude Toward Technology, and Intention to Use. This study examines the factors that influence the acceptance of technology by UT postgraduate students toward using information technology in distance learning. The research results are used to develop distance education management, especially in developing internet technology-based learning. The results show that the variables measured have a significant effect on the use of distance learning technology. The Behavioral Intention to Use variable has the most significant influence on Actual Use (AU), followed by the influence of Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) on Attitude Toward Using (ATU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) on Attitude Toward Using (ATU).Open University, Technology Acceptance Models, Technology Based Learning Management
|
Keywords
Full Text:
References
Al-Emran, Mezhuyev, & Kamaludin. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-Learning Context: A Systematic Review. Comput Educ, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Anderson, E., & Hira, A. (2020). Loss of Brick-and-Mortar Schooling: How Elementary Educators Respond. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0085
Ayouni, Menzel, Hajjej, Madden, & Al-Otaibi. (2021). Fuzzy Vikor Application for Learning Management Systems Evaluation in Higher Education. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ, 17(2), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2021040102
Ayu, M. (2020). Online Learning: Leading E-Learning at Higher Education. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515
Disastra, G. M., & Wahyuningtyas, R. (2020). User Satisfaction of E-Learning System Implementation for Training and Development Program in Organization. 135(Aicmbs 2019), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200410.038
Dzuranin, Jones, & Olvera. (2018). Infusing Data Analytics into The Accounting Curriculum: A Framework and Insights from Faculty. J. Account. Educ, 43, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.03.004
Fan, C. (2021). The Physical Learning Environment of Online Distance Learners in Higher Education – A Conceptual Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635117
Flack, C. B., Walker, L., Bickerstaff, A., & Margetts, C. (2020). Socioeconomic Disparities in Australian Schooling during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Pivot Professional Learning.
Geng, S., Law, K. M., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating Self-directed Learning and Technology Readiness in Blending Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Gharaibeh, Arshad, & Gharaibh. (2018). Using the UTAUT2 Model to Determine Factors Affecting Adoption of Mobile Banking Services: A Qualitative Approach. Int J Interact Mob Technol, 2(4), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.8525
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology Submitted Article, July, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Gurcan, F., & Cagiltay, N. E. (2020). Research Trends on Distance Learning: A Text Mining-Based Literature Review from 2008 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815795
Hämäläinen, R., DeWever, B., Nissinen, K., & Cincinnato, S. (2019). What Makes the Difference—PIAAC as A Resource for Understanding The Problem-Solving Skills of Europe’s Higher-Education Adults. Comput. Educ, 129, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.013
Idoga, Toycan, Nadiri, & Çelebi. (2018). Factors Affecting the Successful Adoption of e-Health Cloud based Health System from Healthcare Consumers’ Perspective. IEEE Access, 6(c), 71216–71228. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881489
Kaewsaiha, & Chanchalor. (2021). Factors Affecting the Usage of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education. Educ. Inf. Technol, 26(3), 2919–2939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10374-2
Mensah. (2020). Impact of Government Capacity and E-government Per Formance on the Adoption of E-Government Services. Int J Public Adm, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059
Naidu, S. (2020). It is the worst—And the best—Of times! Distance Education, 41(4), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1825929
Opoku, M. O., & Enu-Kwesi, F. (2020). Relevance of The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Information Management Research: A Review of Selected Empirical Evidence. Pressacademia, 7(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1186
Oudeweetering, van de, & Voogt. (2018). Teachers’ Conceptualization and Enactment of Twenty-First Century Competences: Exploring Dimensions for New Curricula. Curric. J, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does E-Learning Service Quality Influence E-Learning Student Satisfaction and Loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
Picatoste, Pérez-Ortiz, & Ruesga-Benito. (2018). New Educational Pattern in Response to New Technologies and Sustainable Development. Enlightening ICT Skills for Youth Employability in the European Union. Telemat. Informatics, 35(4), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.014
Poellhuber, B., Fournier St-Laurent, S., & Roy, N. (2018). Using the TAM and Functional Analysis to Predict the Most Used Functions of an Active Learning Classroom (ALC). Frontiers in ICT, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00008
Prahani, B. K., Alfin, J., Fuad, A. Z., Saphira, H. V., Hariyono, E., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Learning Management System (LMS) Research During 1991–2021: How Technology Affects Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(17), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.30763
Ramirez, G. ., Collazos, C. ., & Moreira, F. (2018). All-Learning: The State of The Art of The Models and The Methodologies Educational with ICT. Telemat. Inform, 35, 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.004
Scherer, Siddiq, & Tondeur. (2019). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explaining Teachers’ Adoption of Digital Technology In Education. Comput Educ, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sholikah, M., & Sutirman, S. (2020). How Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Factors of Electronic Learning Influence Education Service Quality Through Students’ Satisfaction. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1221–1226. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-50
Williams. (2019). Does Competency-based Education with Blockchain Signal A New Mission for Universities? J. High. Educ. Policy Manag, 41(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1520491
Xiao, J. (2018). On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Education, 39, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1429213
Youssef, A. Ben, Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT Use , Digital Skills and Students ’ Academic Performance : Exploring the Digital Divide. MDPI Jorunal Information, 13(129), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
| 10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i4.5945 |
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tita Rosita, Rhini Fatmasari
