Implementasi Prinsip Diskresi dalam Tugas Satpol PP Terhadap Penertiban Pedagang Kaki Lima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/guyub.v7i2.15178
Authors

(1)  Muhammad Zulkifli   (Universitas Riau Kepulauan)  
        Indonesia
(2) * Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti   (Universitas Riau Kepulauan)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Indra Sakti   (Universitas Riau Kepulauan)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Seftia Azrianti   (Universitas Riau Kepulauan)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The enforcement of regulations against street vendors by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) often creates a dilemma between maintaining public order and protecting the livelihoods of informal-sector communities. This condition highlights the need to strengthen the capacity of Satpol PP personnel in exercising administrative discretion in accordance with the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB). This community service program aimed to enhance the knowledge and practical capacity of Satpol PP personnel in Batam City to implement discretionary authority in a lawful, proportionate, accountable, and public-oriented manner. The program was conducted through problem identification based on document review and case studies of street vendor enforcement, followed by educational sessions, focus group discussions (FGDs), and mentoring activities to evaluate enforcement practices using five indicators of good governance: legality, conformity with the purpose of authority, administrative prudence, proportionality, and public benefit. The results showed that the participants had a better understanding of the legal basis for administrative discretion; however, several challenges remained, including inconsistent administrative documentation, inadequate justification of discretionary decisions, and limited integration between enforcement measures and street vendor empowerment programs. In addition, the discussions revealed that enforcement actions focusing solely on restoring public order had not yet produced sustainable compliance and continued to generate social tensions with informal-sector vendors. The program recommends strengthening AUPB-based standard operating procedures, improving administrative documentation, enhancing pre-enforcement communication, and integrating enforcement activities with more comprehensive street vendor management and empowerment programs to ensure that the exercise of administrative discretion becomes more accountable, humane, and socially just.


Keywords

Discretion; Civil Service Police Unit; Street Vendors; Enforcement; Good Governance.



Full Text: PDF



References


Allegrezza, S., & Lasagni, G. (2024). The enforcement of ECB sanctions in light of the proportionality principle: Is there a need for a guide to define a solid legal framework? Common Market Law Review, 61(3). https://testcdn.kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=JournalsCOLACOLA2024046.pdf https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2024046

Amiarso, E. A. (2021). Pertimbangan Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Penanganan Kasus Tindak Pidana Minuman Keras Di Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 2(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v2i1.11562

Bandauko, E., & Arku, G. (2025). ‘They want to get rid of us by all means’: A critical analysis of policy and governance responses and their implications for street traders’ access to urban space in Harare, Zimbabwe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 43(5), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241298414

Bonggasau, E., & Ismawati, A. (2026). Strategy of the Police Civil Servant Unit (Satpol PP) of Polewali Mandar Regency in Regulating Street Vendors: Case Study. Mahogany Journal De Social, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v3i1.308

Cananea, G. D., & Parona, L. (2024). Administrative Procedure Acts in Europe: An Emerging “Common Core”? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 72(2), 324–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae016

Chakunda, V. (2023). A “war against livelihoods”: Contestations over the government of Zimbabwe’s response to street vending in selected cities. City, Culture and Society, 34, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100536

Deligiannis, A. P., Mitropoulou, D., & Peristeras, V. (2026). Public Sector Innovation Capacity in Core Administrative Organizations: Evidence from Norway’s Brønnøysund Register Centre. Administrative Sciences, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020092

Ebeler, L., Balke, T., Laurie, E., Le, H., Nguyen, T., & Renaud, F. G. (2025). Local-scale impacts of mangrove restoration and conservation on coastal communities in two Vietnamese deltas: Socio-economic and institutional dynamics. Ocean & Coastal Management, 269, 107812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107812

Hassan, R. (2021). Issue Information. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 993–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13231

Hilda, H. H. S., Muflih Munazih, & Siti Kunarti. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara Terhadap Pembentukan Koperasi Desa Merah Putih Melalui Instruksi Presiden. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(2), 901–922. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12031

Ibad, D. S. S. I. (2026). Hukum Administrasi Negara: Prinsip, Kewenangan, Diskresi, dan Pengawasan dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. PT. Revormasi Jangkar Philosophia.

Junaedi, G. S. (2022). Peran Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Dalam Penegakan Peraturan Daerah di Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Tatapamong, 4(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.33701/jurnaltatapamong.v4i2.2589

Kim, C., Nakanishi, H., Blackman, D., Freyens, B., & Benson, A. M. (2017). The Effect of Social Capital on Community Co-production: Towards Community-oriented Development in Post-disaster Recovery. Procedia Engineering, 180, 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.251

Leerssen, P. (2023). An end to shadow banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation. Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105790

Lestari, F., S. T. ,. M. Sc, IPM, I. M., S. T. ,. M. T., M.Sc, R. G. R., S. T., IPM, I. B. H. N., S. T, M. Sc, M.Si, K. M., ST, S.PWK, G. R. M. N., & S.PWK, R. D. A. (2025). PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA: Menyeimbangkan Ruang untuk Semua. wawasan Ilmu.

Lindeboom, J. (2022). Rules, Discretion, and Reasoning According to Law: A Dynamic-Positivist Perspective on Google Shopping. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 13(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpac008

Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Detecting the city-scale spatial pattern of the urban informal sector by using the street view images: A street vendor massive investigation case. Cities, 131, 103959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103959

Loeffler, E., & Timm-Arnold, P. (2021). Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter? Public Policy and Administration, 36(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720905006

Prayitno, C. (2020). Analisis Konstitusionalitas Batasan Kewenangan Presiden dalam Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1733

Rahmadanita, A., & Nurrahman, A. (2022). Penyelenggaraan Fungsi Pemeliharaan Ketenteraman dan Ketertiban Umum oleh Satuan polisi Pamong Praja di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Tatapamong, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.33701/jurnaltatapamong.v4i2.3014

Rilinger, G. (2023). Who captures whom? Regulatory misperceptions and the timing of cognitive capture. Regulation & Governance, 17(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12438

Rosadi, O., & Putra, I. (2025). Sinergitas Kewenangan Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Dengan Kepolisian Dalam Penyelenggaraan Ketertiban Umum. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(2), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.31933/ztv5ps23

Senna, A. L., & de Araujo Moxotó, A. C. (2025). Carbon emissions and financial performance in the Brazilian stock market. Journal of Environmental Management, 377, 124698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124698

Utama, B., Angkasa, A., Prayitno, K. P., Sudrajat, T., & Najib, M. A. (2025). Islamic Law Analysis of the Prosecutor’s Authority in Asset Forfeiture from Corruption. Al-Ahkam, 35(2), 313–348. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.2.26343

Widhi Antoro, B. H. (2021). Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di PTUN. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v13i2.350


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/guyub.v7i2.15178


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Zulkifli, Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti, Indra Sakti, Seftia Azrianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal is licensed under

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto