PKM Improving Capability of Madrasah Teachers in Implementing Classroom Research in Probolinggo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/guyub.v2i3.3084

Authors (s)


(1) * Moh. Fachri   (Universitas Nurul Jadid)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Yuni Safitri   ()  
        Indonesia
(3)  Yuni Permata Sari   (Universitas Nurul Jadid)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Nurul Jamila   (Universitas Nurul Jadid)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Intan Permata Sari   (Universitas Nurul Jadid)  
        Indonesia
(6)  Rohmah Rohmah   (Universitas Nurul Jadid)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Teachers as a professional staff should have the ability to analyze the problem on the kids, and it has become the study to solve problems students through classroom research. But most teachers have not known enough to develop a research proposal class action. Teachers' low-level knowledge in doing classroom research is one of the problems in contemporary education. This community service is to equip teachers to implement classroom research. This study aims to make most teachers understand classroom research and figure out how to arrange good classroom research. The benefit of this community service was that teachers were able to make proposals/proposals for classroom research good and under the proper format and give the idea of a follow-up to teachers after composing classroom research proposals. The purpose for teachers on the procedure writing classroom research is that they are motivated to write classroom research. As for the result of assistance and changes in conclusion as follows: 1) able to identify problems in learning in class. School teachers can also solve a problem by solutions that they consider strategic through learning innovative methods. 2) school teachers can describe identification problems in the background problems and determine the title research will be classroom research. School teachers also have been able to prepare the theory according to the title research will be implemented. 3) school teachers can arrange research procedures consisting of planning, research, observation, and reflection. 4) school teachers can learn according to learning preparation every cycle. 5) school teachers can arrange research reports on classroom action in the scientific article. 



Keywords

professionalism; school; classroom research



Full Text: PDF



References


Chakhshi, S., Clea, F. (2004). Cellenger to Importing Japanes Lesson Study. Bloomington Concerns, Miscoseptions, and Nuancen. www.proquets.umi.com.

Chakhshi, S., Clea, F. (2005). Reaping the Systemic Benefits of Lesson Study Bloomington: Insights from the U.S. Vol 86. www.proquets.umi.com.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005, Tentang Guru dan Dosen, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 07 Tahun 2007, tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Lembaga Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan, Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2007, tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Inagaki, T. and Sato, M. (1996). Jugyo Kenkyu Nyumon (Introduction to Lesson Study. Tokyo: Iwanami.

Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Researh Reader. Victoria, Deakin University Press.

Marsigit. (2007). Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Development Through Lesson Study in Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3 (2), 141-144.

Robinson N. (2006). Lesson Study: An example of its adaptation to Israeli middle school teachers. (Online): stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/ Robinson proposal.doc

Stephen L., T. (2007) Science Activities, Washington: Winter 2007. Vol. 43. Iss. 4, pg.27, 7 pgs.

Stewart, R, Brederfur, J. (2005). Fusing Lesson Study and Aithetic Achievent. Bloomington: A. Model for Teacher Collabooration. www.proquest.umi.com

Suhardjono, A. H., et.al. (1996). Pedoman Penyusunan Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan dan Angka Kredit Pengembangan Profesi Widya-iswara. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Dikdasmen.

Suhardjono. (2010). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Makalah pada Diklat Pengembangan Profesi bagi Jabatan Fungsional Guru, Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Depdiknas.

Suhardjono. (2005). Laporan Penelitian Eksperimen dan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas sebagai KTI, Makalah pada Pelatihan Peningkatan Mutu Guru di Makasar, Jakarta, 2005

Suharsim, A., Suhardjono, dan Supardi. (2006). Peneilitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

William, C. and Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson Study as a Model for Building Pedogogical Knowledge and Improving Teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 18 (3), 150-257. ISSN 1812- 9129

Muhson, A. (2004). Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru: Sebuah Harapan. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan.

Supriadi, O. (2009). Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS Unimed.

Sutarmanto. (2015). KOMPETENSI DAN PROFESIONALISME GURU. Jurnal Tabularasa.


Article View

Abstract views : 185 times | PDF files viewed : 113 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/guyub.v2i3.3084


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Moh. Fachri, Yuni Safitri, Yuni Permata Sari, Nurul Jamila, Intan Permata Sari, Rohmah Rohmah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal is licensed under

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.