AI DRIVEN DIGITAL BRAND COMMUNICATION FOR PARENTAL ENGAGEMENT IN STEM EDUCATION


Authors

(1) * Mega Berlian Batee   (Universitas Esa Unggul)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Gerry Firmansyah   (Universitas Esa Unggul)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study proposes an AI-based conceptual framework to evaluate digital communication and parental trust in children’s STEM learning centers. As educational institutions increasingly rely on online communication, many early-stage learning centers lack structured approaches to assess how parents respond to digital messaging across diverse contexts. Using a conceptual literature review approach, this study synthesizes prior research on digital branding, parental engagement, and artificial intelligence in educational communication. The proposed framework positions AI-driven tools, such as sentiment analysis and media monitoring systems, as strategic mechanisms for interpreting parental responses and improving communication effectiveness. This study contributes by integrating AI perspectives into digital branding research and offers practical guidance for learning centers seeking to strengthen parent–institution relationships through data-informed communication strategies.





Full Text: PDF



References


Alothman HF, Bashatah L, Aldossari AS, et al. 2024. How Saudi parents rationalize the choice of school for their children. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11: 1336.

Benson V. 2023. Handbook of Social Media in Education, Consumer Behavior and Politics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Blake BS, Mestry R. 2020. Parental decision-making factors for school choice: A South African middle class perspective. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 48: 1046–1062.

del Pino AD, García León AA. 2020. Digital branding in higher education institutions. In:

Book Title Unknown. pp. 13–29.

del Pino AD, Lloret-Romero NL. 2020. Improving university reputation through academic digital branding. In: Book Title Unknown. pp. 1–340.

Fleming-Milici F, Harris JL. 2020. Adolescents’ engagement with unhealthy food and beverage brands on social media. Appetite 146: 104501.

Gambhir S, Sharma A. 2024. Digital marketing strategies in higher education: Tools and techniques for engaging prospective students. In: Proceedings of IEEE SMART Conference.

pp. 627–632.

Kolidakis S, Kotoula KM, Botzoris G, et al. 2024. Assessing impact factors that affect school mobility utilizing a machine learning approach. Sustainability 16: 588.

Li X, Keown-Stoneman CDG, Borkhoff CM, et al. 2023. Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort. PLOS ONE 18: e0284192.

Liu S, Ghasemy M. 2025. Research progress and frontiers of the university brand: A bibliometric review between 2003 and 2024. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education (in press).

Manoharan AP, Hohensinn L, Wu HC. 2025. Public branding in the digital age: An empirical investigation of U.S. cities. International Journal of Public Administration 48: 43–54.

Mogaji E. 2020. Academic staff using university website profile page for digital branding. In:

Book Title Unknown. pp. 30–46.

Narot P, Kiettikunwong N. 2024. A strategy to reorient parental perceptions to create conditions for successful inclusive education. Education Sciences 14: 358.

Noteboom C, Crandall K, Noteboom M. 2024. Influencing adolescents’ career choices: Parents’ perceptions of information systems. Issues in Information Systems 25: 13–25.

Oré-Calixto S, Vicente-Ramos W. 2021. The effect of digital marketing on customer relationship management in the education sector: Peruvian case. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 9: 549–554.

Penderi E, Karousou A, Papanastasatou I. 2023. A multidimensional–multilevel approach to literacy-related parental involvement. Education Sciences 13: 1192.

Precioso J, Sousa I, Araújo C, et al. 2022. Parental perceptions and behaviors about children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in Portugal. Sustainability 14: 267.

Purwawangsa H, Slamet AS, Irfany MI, et al. 2025. Transforming rural communities through One Village One CEO program. In: BIO Web of Conferences 186: 2010.

Raczynski D, Sebring PB, Weinstein J, Gordon MF. 2022. Relational trust in Valparaíso, Chile and Illinois schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education 25: 66–87.

Rosman ANB, Suneesh S, Yadollahi E. 2025. Exploring parental AI literacy and perceptions of robot transparency. In: Proceedings of ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference.

pp. 984–988.

Sahli F, Alidousti S, Naghshineh N. 2024. Designing a branding model for academic libraries affiliated with the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in Iran. Library Hi Tech 42: 1305–1330.

Shirotriya AK, Sharma L, Beighle A. 2023. Exploring barriers to physical education opportunities in India’s schools. Education Sciences 13: 1184.

Su J, Yang W. 2024. AI literacy curriculum and its relation to children’s perceptions of robots and attitudes towards engineering and science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 40: 241–253.

Wang Z, Mei Y, Ouyang J. 2025. Parental perceptions and acceptance of intelligent control in AI-enhanced education platforms. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 405: 672–680.

Wilking CL, Moukalled SH, Polacsek M. 2023. Reducing student exposure to digital food and beverage marketing: Policy and practice recommendations. Journal of School Health 93: 638–643.

Willyarto MN, Yunus U, Supeno. 2022. Digital branding of vocational high school with industrial partnership. In: Proceedings of ACM. pp. 350–355.

Yashwanth R. 2024. Brand equity’s effect on brand loyalty and customer satisfaction as mediating role: A study on education sector. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope 5: 95–107.

Zahra MF, Baig F, Hassan TU. 2021. Media exposure and child psychology: Parental perceptions about effects. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 10: 113–124




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mega Berlian Batee, Gerry Firmansyah