How Social Media Affects the Image of Religious Figures

Dedi Syaputra, Muhammad Anshori, Khusnu al Rizkiyah, Dixi Nugroho




Abstract

The focus of this research is to understand how the public reaction to Habib Bahar's harsh da'wah style shapes his image in the eyes of the public, as well as how social media plays a role in strengthening or damaging the perception of religious figures. This research uses a qualitative approach with content analysis techniques, where the analysis unit includes text, images, and interactions on social media. Data was collected from various social media platforms and articles relevant to the phenomenon, which were then analyzed to identify emerging patterns, themes, and narratives. The results of the study show that although Habib Bahar's harsh da'wah style has attracted sharp criticism, this phenomenon actually strengthens his visibility and image in the eyes of his supporters. However, it also created a deep polarization among the public, with most audiences supporting his assertive approach, while others deemed the style not reflective of the morals of a religious figure. The implications of this study show that social media has an important role in shaping public perceptions, both positively and negatively, of religious figures, and the importance of balancing freedom of speech and social responsibility in communicating on digital platforms.

Keywords

Social Media; Image; Religious Figures

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad Rizal, A. R., Nordin, S. M., Ahmad, W. F. W., Ahmad Khiri, M. J., & Hussin, S. H. (2022). How Does Social Media Influence People to Get Vaccinated? The Elaboration Likelihood Model of a Person’s Attitude and Intention to Get COVID-19 Vaccines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042378

Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021). Twenty-Five Years of Social Media: A Review of Social Media Applications and Definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134

Arora, S. D., Singh, G. P., Chakraborty, A., & Maity, M. (2022). Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942

Aurini, J. D., Heath, M., & Howells, S. (2021). The how to of qualitative research. Sage.

Balietti, S., Getoor, L., Goldstein, D. G., & Watts, D. J. (2021). Reducing opinion polarization: Effects of exposure to similar people with differing political views. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(52), e2112552118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112552118

Bozzola, E., Spina, G., Agostiniani, R., Barni, S., Russo, R., Scarpato, E., Di Mauro, A., Di Stefano, A. V., Caruso, C., Corsello, G., & Staiano, A. (2022). The Use of Social Media in Children and Adolescents: Scoping Review on the Potential Risks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169960

de Rosa, A. S., Bocci, E., Bonito, M., & Salvati, M. (2021). Twitter as social media arena for polarised social representations about the (im)migration: The controversial discourse in the Italian and international political frame. Migration Studies, 9(3), 1167–1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnab001

Diaz Ruiz, C., & Nilsson, T. (2023). Disinformation and Echo Chambers: How Disinformation Circulates on Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 42(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221103852

Donaldson, S. I., Dormanesh, A., Perez, C., Majmundar, A., & Allem, J. P. (2022). Association between Exposure to Tobacco Content on Social Media and Tobacco Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(9), 878–885. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2223

Dong, X., & Lian, Y. (2021). A review of social media-based public opinion analyses: Challenges and recommendations. Technology in Society, 67, 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101724

Evers, K., & Chen, S. (2022). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1869–1889. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839504

Farsi, D. (2021). Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e23205. https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23205/

Frazer, I., Orr, C., & Thielking, M. (2023). Applying the Framework Method to Qualitative Psychological Research: Methodological Overview and Worked Example. Qualitative Psychology, 10(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000238

Gimpel, H., Heger, S., Olenberger, C., & Utz, L. (2021). The Effectiveness of Social Norms in Fighting Fake News on Social Media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(1), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1870389

Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341

Helm, R. K., & Nasu, H. (2021). Regulatory Responses to “Fake News” and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation. Human Rights Law Review, 21(2), 302–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa060

Johnston, J., Pálsdóttir, Á., Mierzecka, A., Audunson, R. A., Hobohm, H. C., Rydbeck, K., Tóth, M., Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C., Jochumsen, H., Khosrowjerdi, M., & Evjen, S. (2022). Public librarians’ perception of their professional role and the library’s role in supporting the public sphere: a multi-country comparison. Journal of Documentation, 78(5), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2021-0178

Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Disinformation and the Structural Transformations of the Public Arena: Addressing the Actual Challenges to Democracy. Social Media and Society, 7(1), 2056305121988928. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928

Lim, S. L., & Bentley, P. J. (2022). Opinion amplification causes extreme polarization in social networks. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22856-z

Norris, P. (2023). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 145–174.

Prosek, E. A., & Gibson, D. M. (2021). Promoting rigorous research by examining lived experiences: A review of four qualitative traditions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 167–177.

Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., Shan, G., Roth, R. W., Ferrise, E., & Thatcher, J. B. (2024). Doxing, political affiliation, and type of information: Effects on suspicion, perceived similarity, and hiring-related judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(5), 730.

Tkáčová, H., Pavlíková, M., Tvrdoň, M., & Prokopyev, A. I. (2021). Existence and prevention of social exclusion of religious university students due to stereotyping. Bogoslovni Vestnik, 81(1), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2021/01/TKACOVA

Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021). Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society. PLoS ONE, 16(10 October), e0258259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258259

Wang, C. L. (2021). New frontiers and future directions in interactive marketing: Inaugural Editorial. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-270

Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2020). Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dedi Syaputra, Muhammad Anshori, Khusnu al Rizkiyah, Dixi Nugroho