ECOLOGICAL INNOVATION AS A PATHWAY TO A JUST FUTURE: COLLABORATION FOR SHARED PROSPERITY

Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen, Maulida Ulfa Hidayah




Abstract

This study examines the concept of ecological innovation as a strategy toward a just future through multi-stakeholder collaborative approaches to achieve shared welfare. Using qualitative research methods with a library research approach, this study analyzes the integration of social justice principles in the development and implementation of ecological innovation. Research findings indicate that ecological innovation has evolved from technology-centric approaches to holistic paradigms integrating social, economic, and environmental dimensions. Multistakeholder collaboration involving academia, business, communities, and government proves to be key to success in creating conducive innovation ecosystems. Effective collaborative governance models require the role of intermediaries and catalyst organizations in facilitating knowledge and technology transfer. Implementation in Indonesia shows great potential, particularly in sustainable tourism and responsible digital transformation contexts, but faces structural and institutional challenges such as gender inequality and ineffective coordination. This research recommends policy reformulation that integrates local wisdom and environmental justice, as well as developing comprehensive success indicators to support achieving Sustainable Development Goals through just ecological innovation.

Keywords

Ecological Innovation, Social Justice, Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration, Sustainable Development, Digital Transformation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afinas, M. A. A. (2023). Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Telaah Taksonomi Keadilan Lingkungan dalam Pemenuhan Hak atas Lingkungan. Prosiding

Seminar Hukum Aktual Problematika Kemudahan Proyek Strategi Nasional:

Konflik Norma Dan Tantangan Kesejahteraan, 1, 47–61. https://www.amnesty.id/ham-dan-lingkungan/,

Antoni, J., Warsah, I., & Warlijasusi, J. (2025). Kolaborasi Multi Stakeholder Dalam Revitalisasi Kurikulum Berbasis Outcome Based Education Program

Studi Manajemen. Tadbiruna: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 208–223.

Aprillia, N. M., Ramadhan, T., & Ramdhan, H. (2023). Pendekatan Lean Startup untuk Inovasi dalam Model Bisnis Ramah Lingkungan dan Kewirausahaan Digital. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 4(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v4i2.1027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Choeriyah, S. S., & Noviaristanti, S. (2021). Model Ekosistem Inovasi Universitas (Studi Kasus Di Bandung Techno Park). Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.7.2.451

Friska Mastarida. (2022). Adopsi Inovasi Kehijauan Dalam Mencapai Keunggulan

Daya Saing Berkelanjutan. ARBITRASE: Journal of Economics and

Accounting, 2(3), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.47065/arbitrase.v2i3.327

Grossmann, K., Connolly, J. J. T., Dereniowska, M., Mattioli, G., Nitschke, L., Thomas, N., & Varo, A. (2022). From sustainable development to socialecological justice: Addressing taboos and naturalizations in order to shift perspective. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(3), 1405–

https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211029427

Haskell, L., Bonnedahl, K. J., & Stål, H. I. (2021). Social innovation related to ecological crises: A systematic literature review and a research agenda for strong sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325(October), 129316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129316

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE

Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kovanen, S. (2021). Collaborative Patterns of Long-Term Sustainability in Community Social Enterprises: An International Comparative Case Study.

Quaestiones Geographicae, 39(4), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo2020-0033

Lim, W. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines.

Australasian Marketing Journal, 33.

https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Mamta, & Kumar, Vinit. (2023). A systematic review of library service quality studies: Models, dimensions, research populations and methods. Journal of

Librarianship and Information Science, 56(2), 534–546.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221148190

Mariani, L., Trivellato, B., Martini, M., & Marafioti, E. (2022). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Collaborative Innovation: Evidence from Four European Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 1075–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05193-z

Matthies, A. L., Stamm, I., Hirvilammi, T., & Närhi, K. (2019). Ecosocial innovations and their capacity to integrate ecological, economic and social sustainability transition. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072107

Munif, M. (2025). Managing Character Education in Pluralistic Schools: A Model of Internalization of Interfaith Values. Journal of Educational Management Research, 4(3), 792–803.

Suhermanto, S., & Jasri, M. (2024). Kiai Kampung and Transformational Leadership: A Model for Non-formal Education to Improve Community Quality of Life. Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies, 1(2), 165–174.

Meilinda, S. R., Salman, D., & Muhammad, S. (2025). Disruption of SocioEcological Systems: The Impact of Land Burning Ban Policy on Farmer

Community in Mantangai District, Central Kalimantan. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi

Pertanian, 21(1), 1–18.

http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/view/43032

Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020). Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8

Nur, M., & Tamam, B. (2024). Transforming Education To Prepare Future Generations To Face Global Challenges. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 02(02), 1539–1545.

Nurul Aini, F., Zamroni, & Solekhin, M. (2024). The Role of Technology and

Ethics in Shapeing Humanity’s Digital Future. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 02(02), 1518–1524.

Rojas Luiz, O., Mariano, E. B., & da Silva, H. M. R. (2021). Pro-poor innovations to promote instrumental freedoms: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413587

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sudirman, F. A., & Susilawaty, F. T. (2022). Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (sdgs): suatu Reviuw literatur sistematis. Journal Publicuho, 5(4), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.41

Sudirman, F. A., Tombora, I. T. A., & La Tarifu. (2022). Tata Kelola Kolaboratif (Collaborative Governance) Pembangunan Pariwisata Bajo Mola Wakatobi. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v6i1.335

Tegethoff, T., Santa, R., Bucheli, J. M., Cabrera, B., & Scavarda, A. (2025). Sustainable development through eco-innovation: A focus on small and medium enterprises in Colombia. PLoS ONE, 20(1), 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316620




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025/08/05 Zulkarnaen