PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS ON TEACHING QUALITY: A STUDY OF ONE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY



Authors (s)


(1) * Muhamad Taufik Hidayat   (School of Education, Culture, and Society, Monash University, Melbourne, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Atika Azzahro Hazima   (Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Achmad Januar Arifin   (Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Putri Pramesti Hening   (Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Annisa Fitri   (Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(6)  Tivana Aulia Sasmito   (Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) is a critical tool for ensuring the quality of higher education. However, SET results do not always comprehensively capture students' perspectives. Factors such as ambiguous evaluation forms, varying interpretations of questions, and the influence of non-academic factors on student responses can impact the reliability of the results. This research aims to reveal students' positive perceptions of the SET and uncover students' negative perceptions of the SET. This study employs a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. The participants consisted of eight informants, including lecturers and students. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews. The data were analyzed using a thematic approach. The validity of the data was ensured through check and recheck, researcher diligence, time triangulation, researcher triangulation, rechecking, and confirmation with informants. The findings indicate that informants held positive and negative perceptions of various aspects of the learning process. Seven key criteria related to student satisfaction were identified, spanning both offline and online learning environments. These criteria were based on student evaluations conducted at the end of each semester. Overall, the perceptions provided by the informants were consistent with the lecturers' expertise and understanding in their respective fields.

Keywords

SET, Evaluation, Perception, Students



Full Text: PDF



References


Prasetio T. Umpan Balik Pada Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Mata Kuliah Ekonomi di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. J Perspekt. 2022;20(1):90–8.

Patah Herwanto R. Mengoptimalkan Pembelajaran Online melalui AI: Peran dan Sikap Dosen dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan dan Kualitas Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. STMIK-IM. 2023;(7).

Ati S, Rohmiyati Y, Danny DE, Taufik A. Persepsi Mahasiswa Fib Undip terhadap Electronic Library Upt Perpustakaan Universitas Diponegoro. Humanika [Internet]. 2013;239–53. Available from: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/humanika/article/view/5323%0Ahttps://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/humanika/article/download/5323/4784

Khaola P, Thetsane R. The validity and reliability of student teaching evaluation at the National University of Lesotho. Int J African High Educ. 2021;8(1):139–57.

Knol MH, Dolan C V, Mellenbergh GJ, van der Maas HLJ. Measuring the quality of university lectures: development and validation of the instructional skills questionnaire (ISQ). PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149163.

Khong TL. The Validity and Reliability of the Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Case in a Private Higher Educational Institution in Malaysia. Int J Innov Educ Res. 2016;2(9):57–63.

Odukoya J, Atayero A, Alao A, Afolabi A. The Concurrent And Predictive Validity Of Covenant University Students’evaluation Of Lecturers’teaching Competence. In: EDULEARN14 Proceedings. IATED; 2014. p. 6316–23.

Montshiwa VT, Moroke ND. Assessment of the reliability and validity of student-lecturer evaluation questionnaire: A case of North West University. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2014;5(14):352–64.

Mittal S, Gera R, Batra DK. Evaluating the validity of student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SET) in India. Educ Train. 2015;57(6):623–38.

Lee K-H. A study on validity and reliability of students’ evaluation. J Korean Data Inf Sci Soc. 2010;21(1):87–98.

Cook C, Jones J, Al-Twal A. Validity and fairness of utilizing student evaluation of teaching (SET) as a primary performance measure. J Furth High Educ. 2022;46(2):172–84.

Zhao J, Gallant DJ. Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: Exploring issues of validity and reliability. Assess Eval High Educ. 2012;37(2):227–35.

Alvarez RA, Miranda MO. Fiabilidad y validez en la evaluación docente universitaria. Rev Electrónica" Actual Investig en Educ. 2010;10(1):1–38.

Sonntag ME, Bassett JF, Snyder T. An empirical test of the validity of student evaluations of teaching made on RateMyProfessors. com. Assess Eval High Educ. 2009;34(5):499–504.

Shevlin M, Banyard P, Davies M, Griffiths M. The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: love me, love my lectures? Assess Eval High Educ. 2000;25(4):397–405.

Yimam W. Students Evaluations of Instructors’ Performance in Higher Education Institutions: What Research Has to Say. Ethiop J High Educ. 2005;2(2):73–101.

Fox R. Validating lecturer effectiveness questionnaires in accounting. Account Educ. 1994;3(3):249–58.

Battle J, Fabick S. Validity of college students’ evaluations of instructors’ competence. Psychol Rep. 1975;37(3_suppl):1112–4.

Hsb RH, Berutu FR, Lestari D. Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kinerja Mengajar Dosen UINSU. Madani J Ilm Multidisiplin. 2023;1(6).

Sukmanasa E, Novita L, Siti F. Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kinerja Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Pakuan. Pedago J Ilm Pendidik. 2017;1(2):91–9.

Neswardi S, Yoyet E, Yuanita I, Iwadiah I. Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Dosen Program Studi Administrasi Bisnis Politeknik Negeri Padang. JIIP-Jurnal Ilm Ilmu Pendidik. 2022;5(3):845–51.

Amalia AR, Uswatun DA. Analisis Respon Mahasiswa dalam Penerapan Group Work Rules pada Metode Presentasi di Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. J Holistika [Internet]. 2019;3(2):81–8. Available from: https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/holistika/article/view/5357

Dedeh. Analisis Tingkat Kepasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Layanan Akademik. J Wahana Pendidik. 2018;5(1):1–9.

Junaedi A, Sjafrizal T. Komunikasi dosen dengan mahasiswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran melalui metode ceramah. J Ekon Sos Hum [Internet]. 2020;01(09):30–40. Available from: https://www.jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/116

Mutawakkil M, Nuraedah N. Gaya Komunikasi Dosen dalam Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. Commun J Ilmu Komun. 2019;3(2):135–52.

Yuliana Y, Aribowo EK, Setianingtyas AF. Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Profil Dosen Menggunakan Analisis Konjoin. Indones J Educ Sci. 2021;3(2):84–97.

Yohanita P. Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap kompetensi dosen di Fakultas Ekonomi Unika Soegijapranata. Ecodunamika. 2018;1(2):1–10.

Khusniati M, Fibriana F. Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan IPA terhadap Kinerja Dosen dalam Rangka Persiapan Akreditasi. In: Seminar Nasional MIPA 2016. 2017.

Halim A. Signifikansi dan Implementasi Berpikir Kritis dalam Proyeksi Dunia Pendidikan Abad 21 Pada Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. J Indones Sos Teknol. 2022;3(3):404–18.

Alisalman M, Berau S. DIKLUS: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Pembelajaran Partisipatif Sebagai Metode dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. DIKLUS J Pendidik Luar Sekol [Internet]. 2022;1(6):2022–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21831/diklus.v6i1.48572

Siagian REF, Nurfitriyanti M. Metode Pembelajaran Inquiry dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Kreativitas Belajar. Form J Ilm Pendidik MIPA. 2015;2(1):35–44.

Telaumbanua A. Teori Belajar Behavioristik dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Merespon Materi Perkuliahan. DIDAKTIKOS: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama…, 3 (1), 49–59. J Pendidik Agama. 2020;

Febrilia BRA, Nissa IC, Pujilestari P, Setyawati DU. Analisis Keterlibatan Dan Respon Mahasiswa Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Menggunakan Google Classroom Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. FIBONACCI J Pendidik Mat dan Mat. 2020;6(2):175.

Yana D, Adam A. Efektivitas Penggunaan Platform Lms Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. J Dimens. 2019;8(1):1–12.

Muzaki H. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar BIPA Tingkat 3 Berbasis Budaya Lokal Malang. J Ilm Semant. 2021;2(02):1–9.

Nur Efendi, Muh Ibnu Sholeh. Manajemen Pendidikan Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran. Acad J Teach Learn. 2023;2(2):68–85.

Titin TD. Hubungan Antara Sarana Prasarana, Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kepuasan Mahasiswa: Perspektif dan Implikasinya. J Bisnisman Ris Bisnis dan Manaj. 2023;4(3):92–100.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025/10/20 Hidayat