BUDDHIST CAUSALITY AND THE FORTUNE-TELLING PRACTICES IN URBAN CHINA: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY OF KARMA–VIPĀKA INTEGRATION IN DIVINATORY DISCOURSE



Authors (s)


(1) * Guangliang HOU   (Department of Global Buddhism, Institute of Science Innovation and Culture, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand)  
        Thailand
(2)  Chompoo Gotiram   (Department of Global Buddhism, Institute of Science Innovation and Culture, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand)  
        Thailand
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article examines how Mahāyāna Buddhist causality—specifically, the triadic concepts of karma, vipāka, and pratītyasamutpāda—is operationalized within the symbolic and discursive systems of contemporary Chinese fortune-telling. Drawing on textual analysis, semi-structured interviews with fifteen diviners, a quantitative survey of 278 clients, and longitudinal case studies, this study proposes a five-layer "divination–causality integration model." Findings demonstrate that Buddhist karmic logic, especially the "cause–condition–result" schema, is embedded in both interpretive frameworks and ritual interventions. Clients' endorsement of karmic beliefs correlates with improved emotional adjustment, more transparent decision-making, and more ethical conduct. This research contributes to the sociology of religion, psychological anthropology, and contemporary Buddhist studies by revealing how doctrinal teachings are reframed as therapeutic tools in late-modern Chinese society. The study further recommends incorporating Buddhist causal reasoning into culturally grounded mental health interventions and digital divinatory technologies.



Keywords

Mahāyāna Buddhism; Karma–vipāka; Divination; Therapeutic Culture; Cognitive Reframing; Religious Modernization; Chinese Urban Religiosity



Full Text: PDF



References


Ammerman, N. T. (2014). Sacred stories, spiritual tribes: Finding religion in everyday life. Oxford University Press.

Azhongrong (阿中荣). (2010). 佛教业力论及其现代诠释 [Buddhist karma theory and its modern interpretation]. 中华书局 [Zhonghua Book Company].

Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford University Press.

Berkwitz, S. C. (2006). Resisting the global in Buddhist studies: Thinking about theory and practice in the disciplinary formation. Oxford University Press.

Campbell, H. (2017). Networked theology: Negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic.

Chandler, D. (2021). Psychopolitics of religion: The therapeutic turn and spiritual governance in late modernity. Routledge.

Cui, Y. (崔宇). (2020). "慧远对业力观的再诠释及其意义 [Huiyuan's reinterpretation of karma and its significance in Pure Land teachings]." 大乘伦理研究 [Journal of Mahāyāna Ethics], 13(1), 27–39.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton, Eds.). University of Massachusetts Press.

Gleig, A., & Winton, D. (2018). Critical terms in engaged Buddhist studies. University of Hawaii Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor Books.

Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Jones, C. B. (2021). Chinese Buddhism in the modern era. State University of New York Press.

Kleinman, A., & Zhang, E. (2006). Social origins of distress and disease: Depression, neurasthenia, and pain in modern China. In A. Kleinman, What really matters: Living a moral life amidst uncertainty and danger (pp. 153–184). Oxford University Press.

Knott, K. (2005). The location of religion: A spatial analysis. Equinox Publishing.

Kohrt, B. A., & Hruschka, D. J. (2010). Nepali concepts of psychological trauma: The role of idioms of distress, ethnopsychology, and ethnophysiology in alleviating suffering and preventing stigma. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 34(2), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-010-9170-2

Liu, M. (刘明). (2015). 中国命理术语词典 [Dictionary of Chinese Astrological Terms]. 中国人民大学出版社 [Renmin University Press].

Lu, W. (卢玮). (2023). 紫微斗数与因果论 [Zi Wei astrology and karmic causality]. 明理出版社 [Mingli Press].

Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. Vintage Books.

Orsi, R. A. (2011). Between heaven and earth: The religious worlds people make and the scholars who study them. Princeton University Press.

Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press.

Rong, Y. (荣玉). (2023). "因果观与创伤后成长:城市信众的实证研究 [Causal belief and post-traumatic growth among urban Chinese religious clients]." 中国宗教心理学期刊 [Chinese Journal of Psychology and Religion], 29(1), 15–34.

Song, L. (宋磊). (2019). “紫微命理中的伦理观 [Ethics in Zi Wei astrology].” 文化天文学杂志 [Journal of Cultural Astronomy], 5(2), 145–152.

Tian, F. (田峰). (2016). 中国民间信仰中的仪式心理学 [Ritual psychology in Chinese folk religion]. 中国社会科学出版社 [China Social Sciences Press].

Wang, Y., & Liang, X. (王一 & 梁晓). (2009). 汉文化中的传统命理与业力思想 [Traditional astrology and karma in Han culture]. 湖南人民出版社 [Hunan People's Publishing House].

Williams, P. (2009). Mahāyāna Buddhism: The doctrinal foundations (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Yang, F. (2011). Religion in China: Survival and revival under Communist rule. Oxford University Press.

Zhang, W. (张伟). (2015). "都市命理实践中的叙事结构与道德意义 [Narrative framing and moral significance in urban Chinese divination]." 亚洲民族学 [Asian Ethnology], 74(2), 243–256.

Zheng, M. (郑明). (2020). "中世纪小说中的因果逻辑与社会秩序 [Karmic logic and social order in medieval Chinese narratives]." 民俗研究 [Folklore Studies], 81(1), 9–13.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025/10/20 Gotiram