ANALYSIS OF THE NALO (NEEDS ANALYSIS, LEARNING, AND OUTPUT) EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS LEARNING
(1) * Ryka Kaswati  
(Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia)          Indonesia
(2)  Riyadi Riyadi   (Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Yetti Supriyati   (Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
AbstractThe complexity of Physics learning in senior high schools requires an evaluation framework that not only measures learning outcomes but also identifies students' learning needs and the quality of instructional implementation. Existing evaluation models, such as CIPP and Hammond, have not comprehensively integrated these dimensions within a Physics-specific evaluation framework. This study aimed to develop the NALO Evaluation Model through a Systematic Literature Review. Relevant studies were identified from reputable international databases and analyzed using thematic synthesis to construct the conceptual dimensions and indicators of the proposed model. The findings revealed three interconnected evaluation components. The Needs Analysis component emphasizes diagnosing students' prior knowledge, misconceptions, cognitive and affective readiness, motivation, and learning context as the foundation for instructional planning. The Learning component evaluates teacher readiness, instructional planning, learning resources, teaching strategies, classroom interaction, formative assessment, and instructional organization to ensure effective implementation. The Output component extends evaluation beyond academic achievement to include conceptual understanding, scientific reasoning, science process skills, scientific attitudes, and twenty-first-century competencies comprising critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication. The novelty of the NALO model lies in integrating these three components into a diagnostic and continuous evaluation framework that explains not only learning outcomes but also the underlying factors contributing to instructional effectiveness. The proposed model provides a comprehensive reference for evaluating and improving the quality of Physics learning in senior high schools. |
Keywords
Full Text: PDF
References
Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Handbook of Research on Science Education. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2(1), 1–1330. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824696
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, educational and psychological measurument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142.
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2018). Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. xxxx.
Aman, A. (2013). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Sejarah Di Sma. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i2.1126
Andre, L., Durksen, T., & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: a decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9222-9
Anif, S., & Sutopo, A. (2017). Model of Biology Teachers’ Professional Competency Development Based on the Early Competency Test in Surakarta Residency. In 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007039902960300
Assem, H. D., Nartey, L., Appiah, E., & Aidoo, J. K. (2023). A Review of Students’ Academic Performance in Physics: Attitude, Instructional Methods, Misconceptions and Teachers Qualification. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.551
Assyauqi, M. I. (2020). Model Pengembangan Borg and Gall. Institut Agama Islam Negeriegeri, December, 2–8. https://www.taufiq.net/2019/09/model-penelitian-pengembangan-borg-and.html
Azaria, D. P. (2014). (2014). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 7(2), 107–115.
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Baybayan, J. Y. (2024). International Journal of Current Science Research and Review An Evaluation of General Mathematics Course using Countenance Stake Evaluation Model. 07(12), 9189–9196. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i12-60
Berger-Estilita, J., & Greif, R. (2020). Using Gagné’s “Instructional Design” to teach clinically applicable knowledge in small groups. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 35, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2020.08.002
Bouchée, T., Thurlings, M., de Putter - Smits, L., & Pepin, B. (2023). Investigating teachers’ and students’ experiences of quantum physics lessons: opportunities and challenges. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(2), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1948826
Brewer, E. W. (2010). Evaluation models for evaluating educational programs. In Assessing and Evaluating Adult Learning in Career and Technical Education (pp. 106–126). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-745-9.ch007
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. The Process of Education. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028999
Budi Bhakti, Y., Tola, B., & Triana, D. D. (2022). Aitpo (Antecedent, Input, Transaction, Product, Outcomes): Mixed Model Evaluasi Cipp Dan Countenace Sebagai Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Kampus Mengajar. JURNAL HURRIAH: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Dan Penelitian, 3(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v3i1.61
Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.856143
Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020
Chang, C. Y., Panjaburee, P., Lin, H. C., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. H. (2022). Effects of online strategies on students’ learning performance, self-efficacy, self-regulation and critical thinking in university online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10071-y
Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education, 88(5), 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10144
Cotrell, S. (2005). Critical Thingking Skills Developing Effective Analysis and Argument.
Deming, D. J. (2022). Four Facts about Human Capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(3), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.3.75
Deta, U. A., Ayun, S. K., Laila, L., Prahani, B. K., & Suprapto, N. (2024). PISA science framework 2018 vs 2025 and its impact in physics education: Literature review. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.9215
Development, P., & Evaluation, P. (1969). An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development Malcolm M . Provus , Principal Investigator Pittsburgh Public Schools Bernard J . McCormick , Superintendent rç. 109. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED030957
Divayana, D. G. H., Suyasa, P. W. A., & Widiartini, N. K. (2021). An innovative model as evaluation model for information technology-based learning at ICT vocational schools. Heliyon, 7(2), e06347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06347
Dizon, A. G., & Dizon, A. G. (2022). Journal of the History of Education Society Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model model Article History. History of Education, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2022.2098390
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Journal of Learning Science, 14(2), 243–279. http://web.mit.edu/jbelcher/www/TEALref/TEAL_Dori&Belcher_JLS_10_01_2004.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Dykhne, M., Hsu, S. Y., McBane, S., Rosenberg, E., & Taheri, R. (2021). Differences in learning styles, critical thinking skills, and peer evaluations between students with and without leadership engagement. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(6), 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.039
Dziob, D., Górska, U., Kołodziej, T., & Čepič, M. (2022). Physics competition to inspire learning and improve soft skills: a case of the Chain Experiment. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 32, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09620-y
Etkina, E., Brookes, D. T., & Planinsic, G. (2021). The Investigative Science Learning Environment (ISLE) approach to learning physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012001
Etkina, E., Gregorcic, B., & Vokos, S. (2017). Organizing physics teacher professional education around productive habit development : A way to meet reform challenges. 010107, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010107
Eviota, J. S., & Liangco, M. M. (2020). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(September), 723–731.
Fadillah, M. A., Alawyah, K., Syafrijon, S., & Usmeldi, U. (2026). Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of PhET Simulations in Physics Education. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 22(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i02.59007
Farrokhnia, M., Meulenbroeks, R. F. G., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Student-Generated Stop-Motion Animation in Science Classes: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1
Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Sanders, J. R. (2022). Program Evaluation : Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines , 5th edition. 14939.
Frye, W., & Hemmer, P. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories. AMEE Guide No. 67, 34(5), 28.
Hadiana Aminudin, A., Nur Syamsiah, E., Najah Nabilah, F., & Samsudin, A. (2024). How is Augmented Reality Developed in Physics Education? A Review with NVivo from 2019-2024. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(2), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp582-600
Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale : development , reliability and validity. 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hake, R. R. (2014). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods : A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introduc. January 1998. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. In Journal of Computers in Education (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Hammond, R. L. (1967). Evaluation At The Local Level. EPIC Evaluation Center, 18.
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Haspen, C. D. T., Syafriani, S., & Ramli, R. (2021). Validitas E-Modul Fisika SMA Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Terintegrasi Etnosains untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 5(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss1/548
Herianto, A., & Ibrahim. (2017). Analisis Efektivitas, Kelebihan, dan Kekurangan Desain Model Cooperative Learning dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Geografi di Pulau Lombok. Membangun Generasi Berkarakter Melalui Pembelajaran Inovatif, 17–27.
Herlinawati, H., Marwa, M., Ismail, N., Junaidi, Liza, L. O., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). The integration of 21st century skills in the curriculum of education. Heliyon, 10(15), e35148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35148
Husnul Rita, A., Saedah, S., & Zahara, H. (2024). Husnul Rita Binti Aris. Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 7(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i3.1261.
Irene, E. A. (2023). Evaluation of Teacher Education Curricula and its relevance to licensure examination using Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100607
J, A., D, Z., J, D., & S, R. (2020). A-238 Psychometric Equivalence of Prorated Boston Naming Test Scores after Noose Item Removal. In Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (Vol. 35, Issue 6, p. 1033). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa068.238
Jaiswal, P. (2019). Using learner-centered instructional approach to foster students’ performances. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.02
Jiang, Y. (2022). Evaluation of pedagogical impact of Business English textbooks on teaching critical thinking skills. Heliyon, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11419
Joan, L., Robert, W., & Price, E. (n.d.). MF-$0,83 HC-$1.67 Plus Posge.
Journal, F., & Vol, E. M. (2024). Student teachers’ perception on the relevance of teaching practice program to the 21. 1, 280–299.
Jugembayeva, B., & Murzagaliyeva, A. (2023). Physics Students’ Innovation Readiness for Digital Learning within the University 4.0 Model: Essential Scientific and Pedagogical Elements That Cause the Educational Format to Evolve in the Context of Advanced Technology Trends. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010233
Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Nurlaelah, E., & Gürbüz, F. (2024). Constructing and providing content validity evidence through the Aiken ’ s V index based on the experts ’ judgments of the instrument to measure mathematical problem-solving skills. 10(1), 64–79.
Kapoor, A., Mehta, A. H., Arobelidze, S., & Foshee, C. M. (2024). A Decision-oriented Approach to Evaluating a Leadership Curriculum in Fellowship. ATS Scholar, 5(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0003OC
Karagöl, İ., & Adigüzel, O. C. (2022). Hammond Değerlendirme Modeli. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD), 1433–1448. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1160173
Khaidir, K. (2015). Pendidikan Berbasis Akidah Pada Tk Islam Terpadu Az-Zahira Meulaboh: Implementasi model evaluasi goal oriented pendekatan Robert L. Hammond. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i1.587
Kim, C. J., Mo, H., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Evaluation of an ultrasound program in nationwide Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in Korean public health and medical institutions. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03271-4
Kim, C. M., & Kwak, E. C. (2022). An Exploration of a Reflective Evaluation Tool for the Teaching Competency of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers in Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138195
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109
Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140(December 2023), 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464
Lawhon, D. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
Lee, H. Y., Zakaria, N. M. @., Wong, Y. S., Nor, N. M., Mahsan, I. P., Wong, M. J., & Lee, H. L. (2024). Communication Technology-Enhanced Collaborative and Constructivism Learning in Improving Students’ Skills on Artworks Production: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Paper Asia, 40(4), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i4b.176
Lee, S. Y., Shin, J.-S., & Lee, S.-H. (2019). How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2019.16.40
Li, J. (2021). Application of Mobile Information System Based on Internet in College Physical Education Classroom Teaching. Mobile Information Systems, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1481070
Liou, S. R., Cheng, C. Y., Chu, T. P., Chang, C. H., & Liu, H. C. (2023). Effectiveness of differentiated instruction on learning outcomes and learning satisfaction in the evidence-based nursing course: Empirical research quantitative. Nursing Open, 10(10), 6794–6807. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1926
Lynch, M. P., & Corbett, A. C. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset shift and the role of cycles of learning. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1924381
Ma’ruf, Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., & Siahaan, P. (2021). Trends in the Development of Physics Learning Multimedia in Indonesia: A Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i3.5853
Maduretno, T. W., & Fajri, L. (2019). The effect of optimization learning resource based on Planning, Organizing, Actuating, Controlling (POAC) on contextual learning to students’ conceptual understanding of motion and force material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012012
Magiera, L. A., & Heathcock, J. C. (2020). Commentary on “Intraobserver Reliability and Construct Validity of the Squat Test in Children With Cerebral Palsy.” In Pediatric Physical Therapy (Vol. 32, Issue 4, p. 404). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0000000000000737
Makhrus, M., Harjono, A., Syukur, A., Bahri, S., & Muntari, M. (2018). Analisis Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (Rpp) Terhadap Kesiapan Guru Sebagai “Role Model” Keterampilan Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.171
Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Hasil Belajar Nirbias Dan Terskala Baku. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1100
Maries, A., Li, Y., & Singh, C. (2024). Challenges faced by women and persons excluded because of their ethnicity and race in physics learning environments: review of the literature and recommendations for departments and instructors. Reports on Progress in Physics. Physical Society (Great Britain), 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad91c4
Maslakhah, I. F., Jatmiko, B., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2024). Development of Physics Learning Media : A Literature Review. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(2), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i2.558
Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Model-Model Penelitian Pengembangan (Research and Development). Respository LPPM Unila, 10, 1–8. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/34333/1/Model-Model Penelitian dan Pengembangan.pdf
McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2885199
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Mesra, R. (2023). Research & Development Dalam Pendidikan. In Https://Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/D6Wck.
Michalska, A. M. (2023). Thomas Kuhn, Stefan Amsterdamski, and the Cycles of Scientific Development. Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 22. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.23.006.17697
Mirzazadeh, A., Gandomkar, R., Hejri, S. M., Hassanzadeh, G., Koochak, H. E., Golestani, A., Jafarian, A., Jalili, M., Nayeri, F., Saleh, N., Shahi, F., & Razavi, S. H. E. (2016). Undergraduate medical education programme renewal: a longitudinal context, input, process and product evaluation study. Perspectives on Medical Education, 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0243-3
Mohamed, B. H., Ari, I., Al-Sada, M. B. S., & Koç, M. (2021). Strategizing human development for a country in transition from a resource-based to a knowledge-based economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413750
Mohiuddin, M., Hosseini, E., Faradonbeh, S. B., & Sabokro, M. (2022). Achieving Human Resource Management Sustainability in Universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020928
Mota, A. R., Didiş Körhasan, N., Miller, K., & Mazur, E. (2019). Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.010136
Mufid, M. (2020). Evaluasi Model Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Program Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan. Quality, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6908
Mukhidin, M., Kustiawan, I., Suartini, T., Hasan, B., & Sukandar, A. (2020). CIPP evaluation learning development model in vocational laboratories based on ISO 9001: 2008. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/4/042099
Nabilah, N., & Suyanto, S. (2025). A CIPP-based evaluation of critical thinking in science: Implementation of the Merdeka curriculum in Mataram public junior high schools. STEM Education, 5(4), 587–616. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025028
Naen, A. B., Maing, C. M. M., Ki’i, O. A., Mukin, M. U. J., & Dewa, E. (2024). Penguatan Kompetensi Guru Fisika Dalam Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran Inovatif Melalui Program PPG Di LPTK Unwira. BERBAKTI : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30822/berbakti.v2i1.3366
Ngoc, N. T. (2024). Perceptions of Tay and Nung ethnic teachers and students regarding the importance of creative experiential activities in developing communication skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i3.3754
Pedro, P. A., Izart, C., Streng, E. S., Rosenkranz, J., & Ghorbani, Y. (2022). Use of Kirkpatrick evaluation model in simulation-based trainings for the mining industry - A case study for froth flotation. Minerals Engineering, 188(April), 107825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107825
Pertiwi, W. A., Sanjaya, L. A., Budi, A. S., Rasmi, D. P., Hasanah, H. A., Winarko, H. B., & Ash-Shiddiqy, A. R. (2021). Evaluation of physics laboratory management in state senior high school Jambi City. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2320. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037880
Praetorius, A., Jentsch, A., Luoto, J., Keller, S. D., Jentsch, A., Luoto, J., & Stefan, D. (2025). Context in research on teaching quality : bringing a complex idea into the spotlight. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 36(2), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2025.2482577
Pramana, C., Chamidah, D., Suyatno, S., Renadi, F., & Syaharuddin, S. (2021). Strategies to improved education quality in Indonesia: A review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 12(3), 1977–1994.
Purnama, U., Arafah, K., & Amin, B. D. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Fisika dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Negeri 5 Makassar. 79–82.
Putra, R. P. (2024). Objek Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam: Analisis Taksonomi Bloom (Kognitif, Afektif, Psikomotorik). Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 149–158.
Rahim, F. R., Sari, S. Y., Sundari, P. D., Aulia, F., & Fauza, N. (2022). Interactive design of physics learning media: The role of teachers and students in a teaching innovation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012075
Rahmawati, I. S. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Tinjauan Terhadap Efektivitas dan Tantangan. El-Idare: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.19109/elidare.v9i2.20229
Raihanati, R., Supriyati, Y., & Rahayu, W. (2015). Efektivitas Program Pendidikan Guru MIPA Kelas Bilingual Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 01(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.01205
Ramli, N., Muljono, P., & Afendi, F. M. (2018). External Factors, Internal Factors and Self-Directed Learning Readiness. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 5(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2018.51.37.42
Ranganathan, H., Singh, D. K. A., Kumar, S., Sharma, S., Chua, S. K., Ahmad, N. B., & Harikrishnan, K. (2021). Readiness towards online learning among physiotherapy undergraduates. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02803-8
Rincon-Flores, E. G., Castano, L., Guerrero Solis, S. L., Olmos Lopez, O., Rodríguez Hernández, C. F., Castillo Lara, L. A., & Aldape Valdés, L. P. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00314-9
Riyadi, R., Daryanto, D., Mahir, I., & Madani, F. (2024). Evaluation of in-Service Teacher Profession Education Program (Issue Veic 2023). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-198-2_115
Rizal, R., Susanti, E., Sulistyaningsih, D., & Budiman, D. M. (2020). Desain Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Guru Fisika Profesional. Diffraction, 2(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v2i1.1695
Rosidin, U., Suyatna, A., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). A combined HOTS-based assessment/STEM learning model to improve secondary students’ thinking skills: A development and evaluation study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.518464
Ruhe, V., & Frcpc, J. D. B. (2012). The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards : a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01879.x
Salsabila, T., Siringoringo, I. M., Sipahutar, S., & Okta, J. C. (2025). Peran Literasi Sains Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Fisika di Tingkat SMA : Suatu Tinjauan Pustaka. 157–163.
Santos, M. R. F., & Caballes, D. G. (2026). A proposed instructional design model for developing learning materials in physics for Filipino learners. SciEnggJ, 19(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.54645/2026191UPB-87
SaThierbach, K., Petrovic, S., Schilbach, S., Mayo, D. J., Perriches, T., Rundlet, E. J. E. J. E. J., Jeon, Y. E., Collins, L. N. L. N., Huber, F. M. F. M., Lin, D. D. H. D. H., Paduch, M., Koide, A., Lu, V. T., Fischer, J., Hurt, E., Koide, S., Kossiakoff, A. A., Hoelz, A., Hawryluk-gara, L. A., … Hoelz, A. (2015). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 3, Issue 1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.056
Settlage, J. (2020). Bryan A. Brown (2019) Science in the City: Culturally Relevant STEM Education and Douglas B. Larkin (2020) Science in Diverse Classrooms: Real Science for Real Students. Science Education, 104(6), 1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21597
Sri Tirto Madawistama, Fatqurhohman, Rahayu, D. V., Syawaludin, M. R., Susanto, H., Hayati, S., Sari, R. K., A’yun, K., Misriyani, Nasiruddin, Afania, N., Peni, N., Utami, A., Yasir, M., Lidi, M. W., Anjani, F., Sa’o, S., Mubarik, Rahmadhani, E., … Risdalina. (2024). Membangun Dinamika Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (MIPA) (Vol. 15, Issue May). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11388196
Steinmetz, A. (1976). 7 . The Discrepancy Evaluation Model. 7(1).
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Sugiyanto, S., Kartowagiran, B., & Jailani, J. (2015). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smp Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4558
Sulaeman, N., Efwinda, S., & Putra, P. D. A. (2022). Teacher Readiness in Stem Education: Voices of Indonesian Physics Teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1191
Sumardi, & Supriyati, Y. (2019). Evaluasi Program Supervisi Akademik Pengawas Sma. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1).
Supratman, Zubaidah, S., Tarigan, M. R. M., & Azis, S. (2023). Contribution of critical thinking, science process skills towards learning outcomes based on gender. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 1985–1993. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24927
Supriyati, Y., & Abraham, I. (2021). Model Pengembangan Kirkpatrick Plus Level 5 ( Return on Training Invesment ) (Kirkpatrick Plus Level 5 Development Model). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1712
T, N. (2022). Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan media pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar murid. MISYKAT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Al-Quran Hadits Syari’ah dan Tarbiyah, 3(1), 171-210. ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 2(3), 119–127.
Tenedero, E., Pacadaljen, L. M., & Tenedero, E. Q. (2021). Learning Experiences In The Emerging Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) Curriculum Of Higher Education Institutions (HEI’S) On The Scope Of Hammond’s Evaluation Cube. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 10325–10332. www.psychologyandeducation.net
Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1–159.
Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, input, process, and product evaluation model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20
Umar, S., Silangen, P. M., & Mandang, T. (2023). Manajemen Pembelajaran Partisipatif Berbasis Project Based Learning Pada Materi Fisika Hukum Pascal. Charm Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.53682/charmsains.v4i2.245
Vraňaková, N., Gyurák Babel’Ová, Z., & Chlpeková, A. (2021). Sustainable human resource management and generational diversity: The importance of the age management pillars. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158496
Waruwu, M. (2024). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141
Wenden, E. J., Budgeon, C. A., Pearce, N. L., & Christian, H. E. (2024). Organizational readiness and implementation fidelity of an early childhood education and care-specific physical activity policy intervention: findings from the Play Active trial. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 46(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad221
Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2013). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Kualitas Dan Output Pembelajaran Ips Di Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v11i1.1417
Wiedemann, M., Schütte, M., Loer, K., & Gerdes, A. (2024). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction Evaluation of the incident management system of a bigger city during the winter flood 2023 / 24 in northern Germany : Organized ( ir ) responsibility in the pre-disaster phase. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 113(May), 104821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104821
Wu, D., Chen, M., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2024). Analyzing K-12 AI education: A large language model study of classroom instruction on learning theories, pedagogy, tools, and AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(May), 100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100295
Wulandari, H., Supriyati, Y., & Jalal, F. (2021). Evaluation of Holistic Integrative Program in Early Childhood Education and Development (PAUD HI). Nternational Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research , 6(April), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.14741/ijmcr/v.6.3.2
Wulandari, R., Baedhowi, & Hindrayani, A. (2021). Measuring Critical Thinking Skills with the RED Model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012030
Yalçın Çer, Ö. (2026). Evaluating the Turkish Classroom-Teaching Undergraduate Program: A CIPP Model Approach. SAGE Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261416973
Yu, J., Kreijkes, P., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Students’ growth mindset: Relation to teacher beliefs, teaching practices, and school climate. Learning and Instruction, 80(September 2021), 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101616
Yvonne, S., & Egon, G. (1982). The University of Kansas Paper prepared for presentation at the American Educational Research Association.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ryka Kaswati