COMMODIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM: A LITERATURE STUDY ON SHIFTING ACCESS TO EDUCATION AND THE SOCIAL JUSTICE EMERGENCY CRISIS


Authors

(1) * Zein Faizin   (Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, East Java, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Subaidi Subaidi   (Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, East Java, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Sukarman Sukarman   (Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, East Java, Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This literature study research analyzes the phenomenon of knowledge commodification in the digital education ecosystem and its implications for access to education and social justice. The rapid transition to educational technology (EdTech) and platform-based learning has shifted the paradigm of education from a public good to a highly commercialized digital commodity. This research aims to evaluate the trend of digital privatization in education, examine the shift in access to learning materials, and respond to emerging education equity emergencies. Using a qualitative literature matrix methodology, data were collected from 20 reputable academic journals published in the last five years, national education statistics reports, and critical sociological frameworks integrated with Islamic educational values. The results show that market-driven digital platforms exacerbate the "digital abyss" and create stratified access to quality education, where premium knowledge is hidden behind paid walls. The study also integrates the Qur'anic instructions on justice in the dissemination of knowledge, and argues that commercial exclusivism violates fundamental human rights in education. The research concludes that the commercialization of digital education poses a critical threat to social justice, thus requiring a strict regulatory framework and institutional commitment to openly accessible public pedagogy.



Keywords

Commodification of Knowledge, Digital Ecosystem, Educational Equity, Social Justice, Literature Studies



Full Text: PDF



References


Apple, M. W. (2023). Can education change society? Neoliberalism and the politics of knowledge. New York: Routledge.

Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association (APJII). (2024). Indonesian internet penetration survey report 2024: Reaching digital inclusivity. Jakarta: APJII.

Ball, S. J. (2021). The errors of governance: Education management, corporate rationality and the market. Journal of Education Policy

Giroux, H. A. (2024). Pedagogy of resistance: Against digital fascism and the commodification of higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 22(1), 45-61.

Gulson, K. N., Sellar, S., & Webb, P. T. (2022). Algorithms and the end of education: The digital privatization of data and management. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (Kemendikbudristek). (2023). Indonesian Education Report Card: Evaluation of achievements, digital transformation, and equitable access to schools. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Komljenovic, J. (2021). The rise of education technology corporations and the privatisation of higher education data. Critical Studies in Education, 62(3), 341-358.

Mundiri, A., Julaiha, S., Duraesa, M. A., & Embong, R. (2026). Exploring The Transformative Zone of Tolerance in Indigenous Education: Insights from Pesantren-Based Services. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 448–464.

Sa’idah, H., & Huda, N. (2026). A Fiqh Muamalah Analysis of Contractual Practices in the E-Bekal Payment System at Nurul Jadid Islamic Boarding School. Indonesian Journal Economic Review, 6(2), 540–548.

Suhermanto. (2025). Principal Leadership Strategies for Enhancing Teacher Performance in Islamic Schools. Journal of Educational Management Research (Vol.04/No.05/2025), 4(Journal of Educational Management Resear), 1886–1898.

Syamsul, K., Affan, M., Somad, A., & Baharun, H. (2026). Digital Ethics and Spirituality From an Islamic Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review. TADIB: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(1), 179–194.

Means, A. J. (2022). Platform capitalism and the governance of knowledge: Educational equity in crisis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1189-1201.

Nugroho, B. (2025). Digital divide in peripheral Indonesia: A critical sociology of online education during structural transitions. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 89-104.

Peters, M. A., Besley, T., & Jandrić, P. (2023). Open education and the digital commons: Beyond the commercial platforms. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(2), 299-315.

Robertson, S. L. (2023). Global EdTech markets and the technical fix: Re-reading the privatization of public pedagogies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 21(4), 481-496.

Robinson, L., Schulz, J., & Dunn, H. S. (2022). Digital inequalities in time of crisis: An international perspective on social equity. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 901-918.

Selwyn, N. (2022). Digital education after COVID-19: Critical perspectives on capitalism, technology and pedagogy. Digital Culture & Education, 14(1), 12-27.

Subrahmanyam, G. (2021). Commercialization of school education and rights of marginalized children in the digital era. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23(Suppl 2), S312-S328.

Suryadarma, D. (2022). Educational technology adoption and learning gap in developing nations: Evidence from rural Indonesia. Asian Development Review, 39(2), 201-224.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Paris: UNESCO.

van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide: The triple paradox of technological inequalities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Warschauer, M. (2021). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide in educational ecosystems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1835-1850.

Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, digital platforms, and education futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107-114.

Zhao, Y. (2024). The failure of EdTech: Why technological privatization cannot deliver educational equity. Kappa Delta Pi Records, 60(1), 18-25.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Zein Faizin