SCHOOL BULLYING BEHAVIOR IN SCHOOL MUHAMMADIYAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 15 SURAKARTA

Muhammad Sohib Yafi; Muhroji Muhroji; Achmad Januar Arifin; Annisa Fitri

SCHOOL BULLYING BEHAVIOR IN SCHOOL MUHAMMADIYAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 15 SURAKARTA

Muhammad Sohib Yafi, Muhroji Muhroji, Achmad Januar Arifin, Annisa Fitri

Abstract

This study aims to describe bullying behavior in SD Muhammadiyah 15 Surakarta,. This type of research is qualitative research (Qualitative Research). Data collection techniques are conducted through interviews, and supporte d by observation and documentation. The validity of the data using source triangulation. Data analysis techniques performed from the reduction stage, display data, and verification/conclusion. The results showed that the perpetrators of school bullying in SD Muhammadiyah 15 Surakarta performed by students, namely Riyan, Riko and Bagus. The causes of school bullying are the school climate, family, social environment, and impressions or media. School bullying behavior is common during break times. The most common type of school bullying is exclusion. Next is threatening, scolding, commanding, mocking, yelling, pointing with fingers to the face, cheering, forcing, pushing the beat with the hand and the broom handle. The role of teachers in dealing with school bullying is to provide counseling to students in need of assistance, including addressing those involved in bullying. The role of schools in relation to bullying is cooperation with the parents through the assistance provided for both victims and perpetrators of bullying. The efforts of teachers in overcoming bullying actors is to direct the perpetrators on the positive and grow harmonious relationships between children and parents

Full Text:

PDF

References

Coloroso, Barbara. (2007). Stop Bullying: Memutus Rantai Kekerasan Anak dari

Prasekolah hingga SMU. Diterjemahkan oleh: Santi Indra

Astuti. Jakarta: PT. Serambi Ilmu Semesta.

Fataruba, Rina. 2016. Peran Tekanan Teman Sebaya terhadap Perilaku Bullying pada

Remaja di Sekolah. Seminar Asean, Psychology & Humanity. Universitas

Muhammadiyah Malang.

James, Alana. (2010). School Bullying. PhD Researcher. Goldsmiths University of

London.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Magfirah, Ulfah dan Rachmawati, Mira Aliza. (2010). Hubungan antara Iklim Sekolah

dengan Kecenderungan Perilaku Bullying. Fakultas Psikologi dan Ilmu Sosial

Budaya Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Milles, Mattew B. & A. Michael Huberman. (2009). Analisis Data Kualitatif.

Diterjemahkan oleh: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UIPress).

Pratama, Andriansyah Adha., Krisnatuti, Diah dan Hastuti, Dwi. 2014. Gaya Pengasuhan

Otoriter dan Perilaku Bullying di Sekolah Menurunkan Self- Esteem Anak Usia

Sekolah. Jur. Ilm. Kel. & Kons., Mei 2014, p : 75-82. Vol. 7, No. 2. ISSN :

– 6037.

Robison, Kathy. (2010). Bullies and Victims: A Primer for Parents. National Association

of School Psychologists.

Sari Pediatri. (2013). Gambaran Bullying dan Hubungannya dengan Masalah Emosi dan

Perilaku pada Anak Sekolah Dasar.Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Anak dan Psikiatri.

Vol. 15. No. 3. Oktober 2013. 175.

Sri Wahyuni & M.G. Adiyanti. (2010). Correlation Between Perception Toward

Parents‟ Authoritarian Parenting And Ability To Empathize WithTendency Of

Bullying Behavior On Teenagers. Fakultas Psikologi. Skripsi.Universitas Gajah

Mada. Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan

R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Suharsaputra, Uhar. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.

Bandung : PT Refika AditamaColoroso, Barbara. (2007). Stop Bullying: Memutus Rantai Kekerasan Anak dari