THE EVOLUTION OF AL-FAHSHĀ’ AND AL-MUNKAR IN THE MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ERA: AN ECO-SUFI SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE

Amelia Putri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/mushaf.v5i1.10606



Abstract

This study aims to expand the understanding of the concepts of fahsyā’ and munkar through an eco-sufistic perspective using Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic approach. Traditionally, these two terms have been understood in moral and social contexts. However, this research offers a reinterpretation that broadens the scope of both concepts. Fahsyā’ is understood as environmental damage caused by irresponsible human activity, while munkar represents internal corruption, such as egoism and behavior that contradicts human nature. Through Charles Sanders Peirce’s triadic theory (sign, object, and interpretant), this study explores Quranic verses to connect the spiritual and ecological dimensions of both concepts. The results show that fahsyā’ reflects the destructive impact of humans on nature, arising from unchecked greed and exploitation. On the other hand, munkar reflects internal dissonance that disrupts the harmony of humans with themselves, society, and their environment. This perspective integrates Sufistic ethics with environmental sustainability issues, emphasizing that ecological awareness is an integral part of Islamic teachings. This approach not only enriches Quran-based ecological discourse but also highlights how Sufism can inspire the development of holistic behaviors that maintain the balance of nature. This study makes a significant contribution by expanding the interpretation of Quranic verses relevant to contemporary ecological issues, while strengthening the role of Islamic spirituality in addressing the pressing challenges of environmental degradation in the modern era.

Keywords

Semiotic Analysis, Fahsya' and Munkar, Eco-Sufistic Exegesis.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Qusyairi, A. al-Q. A. al-K. bin H. (2015). Lathaif al-Isyarat. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah.

Al-Sabuniy, M. ’Ali. (1981). Safwah Al-Tafasir (pp. 1–591). Dar al-Fikr.

Algifari, M. S., & Zuhra, N. (2022). Shalat Sebagai Pencegah Perbuatan Fahsya’ Dan Munkar (Analisis Muqaran Tafsir Al-Qurtubi dan Tafsir Al-Azhar Terhadap Q.S. Al-‘Ankabut/29:45). El-Maqra’: Tafsir, Hadis Dan Teologi, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.31332/elmaqra.v3i1.6278

Arabi, M. I. (1999). Al-Futuhat Al-Makkiyah. Dar al-Kutub al-Amiyah.

Baihaqi, N. N. (2021). Makna Salam Dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce). Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.12928/taqaddumi.v1i1.4108

Gufron, U., & A. Hambali, R. Y. (2022). Manusia, Alam dan Tuhan dalam Ekosufisme Al-Ghazali. Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 7(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v7i1.16275

Guibert, J., Pérez-balarezo, A., & Forestier, H. (2023). Signs of Prehistory. A Peircian semiotic approach to lithics. Archaeological Dialogues, 30(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020382300003X

Hurley, Z. (2023). Signs of #Self: a Peircean Semiotic Framework for Theorizing Self-(re) Presentations on Instagram. Visual CommunicationVisual Communication, 22(4), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211022400

Husna, R., & Bariroh, I. (2024). Penafsiran Term Qawwam pada QS. Al- Nisa’ Ayat 34 dan Korelasinya dengan Neurosains. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(3), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1788

Ihsan, M. N. (2022). Konsep al-Fahsya’ dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Penafsiran Wahbah al-Zuhaili dalam Kitab Tafsir al-Munir. Institur Agama Islam Negeri Palopo.

Istiqomah, N., & Kristanty, S. (2021). Representasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Film Sabtu Bersama Bapak ( Analisis Semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce ). 5(2), 1–13.

Kamus, W. (2025). Mu’jam al-Ma’ani. Al-Ma’ani Lukilli Rasm Ma’na. https://www.almaany.com/id/dict/ar-id/

Kusuma, A. R., & Laili, E. N. (2021). Al-Qur’an Sebagai Solusi Mengatasi Patologi Sosial Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jawi, 4(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.24042/jw.v4i1.8907

Meldayati, R. (2016). Psiko-Ekologi Perspektif Ibn ’Arabi. Young Progressive Muslim.

Musa, M. A., Fawwaz, M., & Yusoff, M. (2024). Assumed Contradictions in the Qurʾān: An Analysis on Al-Alūsī’s Disputation of Al-Kindī in “The Apology of Al-Kindī.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization (JITC), 14(1), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.19

Namira, N. (2024). Dinamika Fahsya’ Dan Munkar Dalam Implementasi Fenomena Sosial Perspektif Al-Qur’an [Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau]. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/77739/2/Skirpsi Lengkap Kecuali Bab IV.pdf

Online, N. (2022). Tafsir Al-Wajiz. NU Online.

Prasetya, M. N. (2021). Makna Fahsya’ Dalam Al-Qur’an Menurut Muhammad Quraish Shihab Dalam Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Ibnu Abbas: Jurnal Ilmu Alquran & Tafsir, 4(2), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.51900/ias.v4i2.17682

Ramadhan, A. R., Arsyad, H., Sopian, A., & Fadlurrahman, I. (2024). Eschatology in the Quran: Charles Sanders Peirce’s Semiotic Study of Surah Al-Waqi’ah. Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 6(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v6i1.8547

Razak, A. A. B. A., & Rahim, M. H. B. A. (2021). The Role of Takwin Al-Du’at in Developing Professional Da’i: An Investigation from Tafsir Al-Manar. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 4(7), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2021.4706

Rosyidin, A. (2020). Fahsya’ dan Munkar dalam Al-Qur’an Dengan Analisis Teori Anti-Sinonimitas. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Soleh, A. K. (2024). Contextualization of the Umminess of the Prophet Muhammad in the Qur’an: An Analysis of The Burhani Epistemology of Muhammad Abed Al-Jabiri. At-Turāṡ: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 11(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v11i2.8355

Sutanto, T. D. (2019). Interpretasi M.Quraish Shihab Dalam Memaknai Ayay-Ayat Al-Quran Tentang Lingkungan Hidup (Studi Tafsir Al-Misbah). In Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.

Syahida, A. R. (2023). Ekosufisme di dalam Tafsir Indonesia Kontemporer (Assoc. Nur Arfiyah Febriani (ed.)). Eureka Media Aksara.

Willms, C. (2020). A Cultural Analysis of Eco-Islam: How Young German Muslims Live Religion Through Environmental Activism. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6734

Zulkarnaen, I., Muntasir, Fauzi, & Hidayat, B. (2023). Dayah Ulama’s Interpretation of Religious Moderation Narratives: Negotiable. Society, 11(2), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.452


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/mushaf.v5i1.10606


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Amelia Putri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This ejournal system and it's contents licensed under

a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License