Dampak AI Generatif (LLMS) terhadap Keterampilan Menulis dan Integritas Akademik: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/trilogi.v6i4.13431

Authors (s)


(1)  Fahmy Syahputra   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Elsa Sabrina   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Tirta Yasa Agung Barus   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(4)  M Farid Al Farishi   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Rabiatul Adwiyah   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(6)  Nadila Ramadani   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(7) * Jauharah Jauharah   (Universitas Negeri Medan)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to examine the impact of Generative AI (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, on students' writing skills and academic integrity through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 15 relevant articles. The synthesis results reveal a significant duality effect, creating a dilemma between efficiency and quality. On one hand, LLMs are proven to be effective assistive co-pilots, which clearly enhance the technical efficiency of writing, accelerate the research workflow, and improve text cohesion and precision. However, this convenience triggers a substance quality crisis because students experience cognitive over-reliance, leading to Academic Deskilling the loss of the ability to independently practice critical reasoning and idea synthesis. This dependency is exacerbated by blind reliance on AI output and vulnerability to hallucinations that threaten the originality of the work. The consequence is a shift in the form of misconduct to the sophisticated practice of prompt engineering. To address these challenges, the literature emphasizes the necessity of pedagogical redesign and assessment redesign, which must focus on establishing ethics that ensure full transparency and accountability from students, and designing tasks that demand personal synthesis and reflective thinking.



Keywords

Academic Deskilling; Academic Integrity; Assessment Redesign; Generative AI; LLMs.



Full Text: PDF



References


Anson, D. W. J. (2024). The impact of large language models on university students ’ literacy development : a dialogue with Lea and Street ’ s academic literacies framework. 4360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2332259

Bittle, K., & El-gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education : A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence ? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 12). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025a). Artificial intelligence ‑ assisted academic writing : recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025b). Artificial intelligence _ assisted academic writing : recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Chinonso, O. E., Theresa, A. M., Caroline, T., & Ph, A. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching , Learning and Research : Prospects and Challenges. 2576. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., Shipway, J. R., Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., Chatting, J. R. S., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2024). Chatting and cheating : Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT Chatting and cheating : Ensuring academic integrity in the era. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dos, I. (n.d.). A Systematic Review of Research on ChatGPT in Higher Education. 2025.

Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education : Balancing Innovation and Integrity. 81(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048

Gabay, R. A. E., & Funa, A. A. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence ( GenAI ) for Academic Writing in Higher Education : A Scoping Review of Applications , Challenges , and Implications. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7440784/v1

Grant, M. J., Booth, A., & Centre, S. (2009). A typology of reviews : an analysis of 14 review types and. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hadi, S., Chairyadi Mulyono, E., Sa’diyah, L., Hendra Pradana, H., Mirwan Hariri, M., Yusmah, Y., Kurnia Rachman, A., Rohmad Aulia, A., Ngainul Yaqin, F., & Tyasing Swastika, G. (2025). STRATEGI EFEKTIF AI (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) DALAM SISTEM PENULISAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH UPAYA PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI TATA TULIS RISET MAHASISWA UNU BLITAR. Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Nusantara (JPPNu), 7(1 SE-Articles), 24–33.

Lancaster, T. (2025). Generative AI for Academic Writing : Case Studies Beyond Simple Chatbot Interactions. 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v15iS1.1067

Lund, B., Mannuru, N. R., Ward, E., Teel, Z. A., Lee, T. H., Ortega, N. J., & Simmons, S. (2026). Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Integrity : Ethical Concerns , Academic Misconduct , and Use of Generative AI in Higher Education. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.1882.v1

Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peláez-sánchez, I. C., Velarde-camaqui, D., Glasserman-morales, L. D., & Peláez-sánchez, I. C. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education : exploring the connection between AI and Education 4 . 0. June. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091

Rahman, R., & Haliq, A. (2025). INTEGRASI AI DALAM PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS. 10, 368–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.25073

Roberts, H., Petticrew, M., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (n.d.). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme with. April 2006, 1–92.

Salman, H. A. (2025). Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. 15(June 2020), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15832

Samala, A. D., Sokolova, E. V., Grassini, S., & Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT : a bibliometric analysis and visualization of emerging educational trends , challenges , and applications. 13(4), 2374–2387. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28119

Science, E. A., & Chanpradit, T. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education : A Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education : A systematic review. April. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6128

Shofiah, N., Ridho, A., & Putera, F. (n.d.). Menyelidiki Implikasi Etis dari Pengintegrasian Generator Teks Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Penulisan Akademik.

Singh, S. P., Khan, I. A., & Mitra, S. K. (2024). SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF CHATGPT IN RESEARCH AND Corresponding Author : 6(1). https://doi.org/10.55691/2582-3868.1177

Ternate, K. A., Utara, M., & Abbas, A. (2023). Analisis Survey Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) dalam Penulisan Tugas Akhir Karya Tulis Ilmiah ( TA-KTI ) di Kampus Akademi Ilmu.

Thi, B., Uyen, T., Tan, T., & An, V. (2025). The Impact of AI Writing Tools on Academic Integrity : Unveiling English- Majored Students ’ Perceptions and Practical Solutions. 16(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.251615

You, S., & Language, B. (n.d.). A Systematic Review of the Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education. 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEE.343528

Zizka, L. (2025). “ It Looks Good Enough ”: Recognizing the Quality of Generative AI Output in Academic Writing Tasks in Higher Education “ It Looks Good Enough ”: Recognizing the Quality of Generative AI Output in. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2025.2496663

Anson, D. W. J. (2024). The impact of large language models on university students ’ literacy development : a dialogue with Lea and Street ’ s academic literacies framework. 4360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2332259

Bittle, K., & El-gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education : A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence ? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 12). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025a). Artificial intelligence ‑ assisted academic writing : recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025b). Artificial intelligence _ assisted academic writing : recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Chinonso, O. E., Theresa, A. M., Caroline, T., & Ph, A. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching , Learning and Research : Prospects and Challenges. 2576. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., Shipway, J. R., Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., Chatting, J. R. S., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2024). Chatting and cheating : Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT Chatting and cheating : Ensuring academic integrity in the era. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dos, I. (n.d.). A Systematic Review of Research on ChatGPT in Higher Education. 2025.

Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education : Balancing Innovation and Integrity. 81(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048

Gabay, R. A. E., & Funa, A. A. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence ( GenAI ) for Academic Writing in Higher Education : A Scoping Review of Applications , Challenges , and Implications. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7440784/v1

Grant, M. J., Booth, A., & Centre, S. (2009). A typology of reviews : an analysis of 14 review types and. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hadi, S., Chairyadi Mulyono, E., Sa’diyah, L., Hendra Pradana, H., Mirwan Hariri, M., Yusmah, Y., Kurnia Rachman, A., Rohmad Aulia, A., Ngainul Yaqin, F., & Tyasing Swastika, G. (2025). STRATEGI EFEKTIF AI (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) DALAM SISTEM PENULISAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH UPAYA PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI TATA TULIS RISET MAHASISWA UNU BLITAR. Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Nusantara (JPPNu), 7(1 SE-Articles), 24–33.

Lancaster, T. (2025). Generative AI for Academic Writing : Case Studies Beyond Simple Chatbot Interactions. 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v15iS1.1067

Lund, B., Mannuru, N. R., Ward, E., Teel, Z. A., Lee, T. H., Ortega, N. J., & Simmons, S. (2026). Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Integrity : Ethical Concerns , Academic Misconduct , and Use of Generative AI in Higher Education. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.1882.v1

Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peláez-sánchez, I. C., Velarde-camaqui, D., Glasserman-morales, L. D., & Peláez-sánchez, I. C. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education : exploring the connection between AI and Education 4 . 0. June. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091

Rahman, R., & Haliq, A. (2025). INTEGRASI AI DALAM PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS. 10, 368–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.25073

Roberts, H., Petticrew, M., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (n.d.). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme with. April 2006, 1–92.

Salman, H. A. (2025). Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. 15(June 2020), 1–20.

Samala, A. D., Sokolova, E. V., Grassini, S., & Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT : a bibliometric analysis and visualization of emerging educational trends , challenges , and applications. 13(4), 2374–2387. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28119

Science, E. A., & Chanpradit, T. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education : A Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education : A systematic review. April. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6128

Shofiah, N., Ridho, A., & Putera, F. (n.d.). Menyelidiki Implikasi Etis dari Pengintegrasian Generator Teks Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Penulisan Akademik.

Singh, S. P., Khan, I. A., & Mitra, S. K. (2024). SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF CHATGPT IN RESEARCH AND Corresponding Author : 6(1). https://doi.org/10.55691/2582-3868.1177

Ternate, K. A., Utara, M., & Abbas, A. (2023). Analisis Survey Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) dalam Penulisan Tugas Akhir Karya Tulis Ilmiah ( TA-KTI ) di Kampus Akademi Ilmu.

Thi, B., Uyen, T., Tan, T., & An, V. (2025). The Impact of AI Writing Tools on Academic Integrity : Unveiling English- Majored Students ’ Perceptions and Practical Solutions. 16(1), 83–110.

You, S., & Language, B. (n.d.). A Systematic Review of the Impact of ChatGPT on Higher Education. 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEE.343528

Zizka, L. (2025). “ It Looks Good Enough ”: Recognizing the Quality of Generative AI Output in Academic Writing Tasks in Higher Education “ It Looks Good Enough ”: Recognizing the Quality of Generative AI Output in. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2025.2496663


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/trilogi.v6i4.13431


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Fahmy Syahputra, Elsa Sabrina, Tirta Yasa Agung Barus, M Farid Al Farishi, Rabiatul Adwiyah, Nadila Ramadani, Jauharah Jauharah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This ejournal system and its contents are licensed under

a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License