RAGAM GRAMATIKAL DALAM ARTIKEL ILMIAH (ACADEMIC VOICES) DI E-JOURNAL

Moh. Hafidz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v2i2.400



Abstract

Grammatical or sound variety in scientific writing (Academic Voices) is a method used by writers to convey their own ideas and other people's ideas in the standard of scientific writing both in the form of Writer's Voice, Direct Voice, Voice indirect (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice). The purpose of this study is to improve the ability of writers about quotations, to distinguish writers' voice, direct voice, indirect voice and external voice and reduce the level of plagiarism in writing journal articles. This study uses research in the form of Electronic Literature Study (E-Library Research) using observation and documentation. The result is 90% (ninety percent) of authors use author's voice (Writer's Voice) rather than direct voice (Direct Voice), indirect voice (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice) in E-journal, formality of writing style scientific works are very varied and e-mail address (e-mail) is one of the conditions for the publication of articles as scientific papers.


Full Text:

PDF

References

Bali, M. M. E. I. (2017). Perguruan Tinggi Islam Berbasis Pondok Pesantren. Al-Tanzim, 1(2), 1–14.

Brick, J. (2009). Academic Culture: A Student's Guide to Studying at University. South Yarra: Macmillan.

Christian, F. E. A. (2017). EFL Learner’s Development of Voice in Academic Writing: Lexical bundle’s, Booster’s/Hedge’s and Stance-taking Strategie’s. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 100-101.

Darmawan, S. L. (2013). Promoting Students’ Explicit Information Skill in Reading Comprehension through Graphic Organizers. Premis, 112.

Davina, B. (2015). Writing to be Heard: Authorial Voice in the Written Discourse of Chinese International Students. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.

Derntl, M. (2014). Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing. Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 106.

Driscoll, D. L. (2011). Introduction to Primary Research: Observations, Surveys, and Interviews. Writing Spaces, 154.

Edwards, R., & and Holland, J. (2013). What is Qualitative Interviewing?. USA: Bloomsbury Academic.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (1994). Implications of Constructivism for Teaching Writing to Students with Special Needs. Sage, 276.

Hafidz, M. (2018). Learner Autonomy on Essay Writing Accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 5(1), 9.

Keiny, S. (1994). Constructivism and Teachers’ Professional Development. Teaching & Teacher Education, 158.

Mehrdad, J. H. D. (2012). Writing for Academic Journals: A General Approach. Electronic Physician, 474.

Melbourne University. (2012). Academic Skills. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from www.services.unimelb.edu.au/academicskills. https://services.unimelb.edu.au/academicskills.

Mogalakwe, M. (2006). The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research. African Sociological Review, 222.

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing. United States: Longman.

Purwoko, A. M. (2018). Studi Kepustakaan Mengenai Landasan Teori dan Praktik Konseling Expressive Writing. Jurnal BK UNESA, 4.

Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems Faced by Indonesian EFL Learners in Writing Argumentative Essay. Englis Review, 1-2.

Reynolds, A. E. D. B. (2012). Finding Your Academic Voice: A Students Guide to the Art of Academic Writing. Irlandia: Dundalk Institute of Technology.

Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.

Tuncela, T. & Bahtiyarb, A. (2014). A Case Study on Constructivist Learning Environment in Content Knowledge Courses in Science Teaching. Procedia Soial and Beaviraol Sciences, 3180.

UTS Library. (2013). Academic Writing. Sydney: University of Technology of Sydney.

Wahyuni, E. S. (2013). Constructivism Learning Model in Writing Arguments and Description in Indonesian Language of Bogor Agricultural University Student. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE) (p. 102). Bandung: ISQAE.

Wilkinson, D. & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments a Guide for Researcher. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Yazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 145.

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case Study as a Research Method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 2.

Zemac, D. & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic Writing from Paragraph to Essay. Spain: Macmillan.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/al-tanzim.v2i2.400


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Moh. Hafidz

Creative Commons License
 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Al-Tanzim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam
Published by Postgraduate of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.