Regulatory Ambiguity in Iddah: The Intersection of Circular Letters and Sirri Marriage Practices in Pontianak City

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v12i3.12592

Authors (s)


(1) * Q. Zaman   (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Vinna Lusiana   (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Ari Widyawati   (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigates the critical issue of Regulatory Ambiguity surrounding the iddah period, specifically examining the friction between the Indonesian Circular Letter No. P-005/DJ.III/HK.00.7/10/2021 and the persistent, widespread practice of unregistered (sirri) marriage in Pontianak City. This intersection creates a crucial challenge to the coherence of Islamic Family Law, amplifying wider theoretical debates on Legal Dualism and the effectiveness of state intervention in personal status matters, ultimately jeopardizing women's rights and the legal protection of children. The primary purpose is to systematically identify the systemic causes of this discrepancy and analyze its profound impact on legal certainty and the state's authoritative capacity regarding matrimonial enforcement. Employing a combined juridical-normative and empirical approach, the research utilized legal document analysis alongside in-depth, strategic interviews with 10 key informants, comprising both officials from the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) and citizens directly involved in sirri marriages, thus providing credible insights into the practical realities of legal pluralism. Findings reveal a profound administrative breakdown, exemplified by the critical statistic that 93% of KUA officials demonstrate a failure to distinguish accurately between iddah talak raj'i (revocable divorce) and iddah talak ba'in (irrevocable divorce). This lack of administrative competency directly translates into a systemic vulnerability, where legal loopholes are routinely exploited, leading to the disenfranchisement of wives and children in property and inheritance claims. This article contributes significantly to the discourse on Islamic Family Law Reform, providing an evidence-based framework for jurisprudential clarity that promotes judicial authority and ensures equitable enforcement of marital rights in the long term



Keywords

Iddah; Unregistered (Sirri) Marriage; Legal Dualism; Regulatory Ambiguity; Islamic Family Law Reform.



Full Text: PDF



References


Arif, M., & Azis, M. (2020). The Dynamic of Islamic Law and State Law: A Legal Pluralism Approach in Contemporary Indonesia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 24(1), 1–21.

Asri Yustia, D., & Arifin, F. (2023). Bureaucratic Reform as an Effort to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2184439

Azra, A. (2021). Islam dalam Bingkai Keindonesiaan dan Kemanusiaan. Mizan.

Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia dan Diklat Kementerian Agama Provinsi Kalimantan Barat (BPSDMD Kemenag Kalbar). (2024). Laporan Tahunan Pelanggaran Administrasi Nikah di Wilayah Kalbar.

Butt, S. (2009). Polygamy and Mixed Marriage in Indonesia: Islam and the Marriage Law in the Courts. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1401135. Social Science Research Network.

Cowan, D., & Wincott, D. (Eds.). (2016). Exploring the constitution of socio-legal space. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137489789

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Pontianak. (2024). Laporan Tahunan Perkawinan Siri 2024.

Etikan, B., Musah, S. A., & Abubakari, R. S. (2016). Comparison of purposive sampling and snowball sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faedlulloh, D., Karmilasari, V., Utami, A., & Fadoli, M. I. (2023). Examining the Indonesia Bureaucracy Response and Problem in Pandemic Times: A Preliminary Diagnostic Study. KnE Social Sciences, 635-644. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i5.13029

Fathurrochman, F., & Sari, R. M. (2023). The role of religious bureaucracy in shaping socio-legal norms: A study on sirri marriage in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 10(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2023.5

Feener, R. M. (2022). Islamic law and social change in Indonesia: Bureaucracy, authority, and everyday practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009053321

Fitriani, A. (2021). Interlegality and hybrid legal orders in Indonesian pluralism: Normative interactions in family law practices. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 53(1), 45–67

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shari‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press.

Hamid, S. (2024). Bureaucratic Reform and the Cost of Non-Compliance in Indonesian Religious Affairs. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(1), 40–58.

Hasyim, A. (2024). The Paradox of Religious Education: Between Fiqh Text and Bureaucratic Practice. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hasyim, S. (2021). Gender justice and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2021.1923345

Hidayat, R. (2023). External Oversight Mechanisms for KUA Performance: A Civil Society Perspective. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 15(1), 12–28.

Hidayatullah, M. (2022). Ketidakjelasan Norma dalam Surat Edaran Nikah dan Dampaknya terhadap Praktik Munakahat. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 20(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.24252/jhi.v20i2.28765

Horhoruw, F. (2022). Legal Implications of Unregistered Marriages in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 12(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v12n3.789

Junaidi, H. M., & Mardi. (2025). Wawancara dengan Kepala KUA Pontianak Timur. Wawancara pribadi.

Kementerian Agama Kota Pontianak. (2024). Rekapitulasi Kasus Nikah Siri 2022–2024.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam.

Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2025). Legal reform in business dispute resolution: A study of legal pluralism in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 28(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.21128

Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislation.

Lindquist, J. (2019). Bureaucratic Islam: The state management of religion in Indonesia. Indonesia, 107, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/26675032

Mahfudz, A. S. (2020). Fiqh Sosial dan Tantangan Modernitas. Yogyakarta, LKiS.

Mahfudz, M. (2020). Religious Instrumentalism in Public Policy: A Review of Islamic Family Law. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(1), 69–85.

Masri. (2024). Pelanggaran Nikah Siri Selama Masa Iddah di Pontianak [Interview].

Maulana, A., & Siregar, H. (2023). Bureaucratic subculture and ethical justification: Navigating formal regulations in Indonesian public service. Public Administration and Development, *43*(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2015

Hidayat, M. (2021). Textual domination and state authority in Indonesian Islamic governance: A socio-legal inquiry. Journal of Islamic Studies, 32(3), 345–367

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mukhlis. (2025). Interview [KUA Pontianak Kota].

Muzayyanah, A. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pemberian Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian (Studi Kasus Desa Banguntapan, Bantul, DIY). Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Nalle, V. I. W. (2023). The Sociological Perspective on The Study of The Living Law: Is It a Part of Legal Discipline or Social Discipline? Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(3), 537-554.

Nasruddin, A. (2019). Fiqh Munakahat: Studi Perbandingan Madzhab. Pustaka Setia.

Nurhayati, S., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Gender and legal pluralism: Patriarchal structures in Indonesia's Islamic legal system. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.1816783

Putra, A. S., & Wulandari, N. (2023). Institutional hybridity and legal pluralism in Indonesia: A socio-legal analysis. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 13(1), 89-110.

Ayu, D. P., Mu'awanah, E., & Naim, N. (2024). Legal Implications Of Husband's Marriage During The Iddah Period (Legal Status And Legal Consequences). ICESH: International Conference on Economic, Social, and Humaniora Series, 2(2), 139-148.

Qur'ani Gunawan, C., & Jannah, S. (2024). Konsekuensi, hukum, dan dampak sosial pernikahan siri terhadap perempuan dan anak menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Pernikahan. Samawa: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 1–15.

Qodir, Z. (2019). Between ideal and reality: The sociology of Islamic law in contemporary Indonesia. Journal of Law and Religion, 34(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2019.15

Ridho, A. (2025). Interview [KUA Pontianak Utara].

Rofiq, A. (2019). Hukum Islam di Indonesia. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sabiq, S. (2015). Fikih sunnah (Vol. 7). Al-Ma’arif.

Shapiro, M. (2015). The Problems of ‘Regulatory Incoherence’ in Administrative Law. Law & Contemporary Problems, 78(3), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627891

Silbey, S. (2015). The Availability of Law Redux: The Correlation of Legal Consciousness and Social Structure. Law & Society Review, 49(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12168

Supriadi, M. (2024). Personal Interview.

Susanti, B. (2023). Hukum Keluarga dan Krisis Otoritas di Indonesia. Pustaka LP3ES.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

van Wichelen, S. (2020). Contesting Islamic family law in Indonesia: Women’s rights and legal mobilization. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.3

Wahyudi, A. (2022). Bridging the implementation gap: Central-local dynamics in Indonesian legal enforcement. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 53(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246342200015X

Watson, A. (2018). Legal transplants and law reform. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 66(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avy001

Widodo, P., & Pratama, A. (2023). Erosion of legal authority: Public trust and compliance in Indonesia's regulatory framework. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 10(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2023.15

Wignjodipoero, R. (2024). Hybridity and Interlegality in Post-Authoritarian Legal Systems. Pustaka Filsafat.

Wirdyaningsih, W. (2024). Is Pluralistic Society a Challenge to the Enforcement of Islamic Criminal Law in Indonesia? Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, 20(1), 1-20.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zuhaili, W. (2011). Al-fiqh al-Islami wa adillatuhu (Vol. 7). Dar al-Fikr


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/at-turas.v12i3.12592


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Qomar Zaman

This journal is licensed under a

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

P-ISSN: 2355-567X, E-ISSN: 2460-1063

Anak Kos Surabaya Modal Rp75 Ribu Raih Rp247,6 Juta Dari Mahjong Ways 2 PGSoft

Fitur Offline Mode & Sync: Rencana Pengembangan Agar fijislot Dapat Diakses Meski Internet Terbatas

Pedagang Angkringan Kota Lama Heboh Usai Saldo Meledak Rp291 Juta dari Scatter Mahjong Ways 2

Pola Turbo 27x di Mahjong Ways 2 Lagi Viral Pemain Winslot118 Cuan Rp243.000.000 Tanpa Setting Akun

Iseng Main Mahjong Wins 3, Pemuda Pulang Bawa Rp210 Juta Hanya dalam 20 Menit

Jangan Lewatkan Pola Mahjong Ways Terkini Sudah Bikin Banyak Pemain Tarik Cuan Besar

Baru Join Sehari! Pemain Mahjong Wins 3 Winslot118 WD Rp243 Juta Modal Receh Rp99 Ribu

besar 2 di cukup pakai trik rahasia ini

Rahasia Terkuak 34 Spin Mahjong Ways 2 Hujani Scatter Pemain Pulang Bawa Rp275 Juta

Pakai QRIS Bikin Main Mahjong Ways Makin Mudah Pemain Bisa Jackpot Tanpa Repot Transfer Bank

Modal Rp90 Ribu, Penjual Pecel Lele Jogja Menang Rp242,3 Juta Dari Mahjong Ways 2 PGSoft

petualangan epik di gates of olympus spin penuh keberuntungan raih jackpot ratusan juta

Mekanik Motor Bermodal Rp100 Ribu Tembus Cuan Rp335 Juta dari Mahjong Ways 2, Kini Punya Bengkel Sendiri

Pola Manual Ganjil Genap Lagi Stabil di Mahjong Ways Mahasiswa UGM Berhasil Cuan Rp246.000.000