.png){kind=logo}
Legal Protection of Concurrent Creditors for The Debts That are not Guaranteed by Property Rights According to Bankruptcy Law and Islamic Law
AbstractBankruptcy is a condition where the debtor is unable to fulfill his obligations to pay debts to creditors. Revision of Law Number 4 of 1998 became Law Number. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations explains that concurrent creditors are creditors who do not hold collateral and who do not have special rights and whose claims are not recognized or recognized conditionally, of course, this causes the position of concurrent creditors to be very vulnerable to getting their rights back on the debt of the bankrupt debtor. This research is normative research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, where in this study the researcher examined the regulations on bankruptcy through the Act and analyzes the concept of legal protection for concurrent creditors. The results of the study showed that, first, Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU (Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations) explains that concurrent creditors are conditional creditors and do not have special rights, their position in paying off debtors' debts from the remaining proceeds from the settlement or auction of bankrupt assets. Second, Islamic law stipulates that the guaranteed of legal protection for creditors is to fulfill debt obligations as regulated in Surah al Baqarah verse 282 based on the principle of al ‘adalah. |
Keywords
Full Text:
References
Adinata, I. M. T., & Priyanto, I. M. D. (2004). Perlindungan hukum kreditor separatis terhadap hak jaminan yang diagunkan oleh debitor pailit. 1–15.
Akibat Hukum Pernyataan Pailit Terhadap Harta Warisan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/2079
Aspek Hukum Penolakan Perdamaian oleh Kreditor Konkuren dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Memperoleh Pembayaran Terhadap Hak Tagihnya. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/30412?show=full
Aziz, A., Stain, R., & Putih Takengon, G. (n.d.). ESENSI UTANG DALAM KONSEP EKONOMI ISLAM.
Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITUR KONKUREN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KEPAILITAN DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.23887/JPKU.V9I1.31436
Fidhayanti, D. (2018). PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN (MISBRUIK VAN OMSTANDIGHEDEN) SEBAGAI LARANGAN DALAM PERJANJIAN SYARIAH. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.18860/J.V9I2.5076
Hukum kepailitan / Adrian Sutedi | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=626690
Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Hutang | Perpustakaan Pusat. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16, 2022, from https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/slims/pusat/index.php?p=show_detail&id=8337
Hukum, P., Kreditor, D. K., Dalam, S., Kepailitan, H. T., Debitor, T., Slamet, S. R., Arjuna, J., No, U., Tomang, T., Jeruk, K., & Barat, J. (n.d.). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN KEDUDUKAN KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM HAL TERJADI KEPAILITAN TERHADAP DEBITOR.
Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktek/ Dr. Munir Fuady, S.H.,M.H.,LL.M. | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1137125
Idham, I., Nawi, S., & Baharuddin, H. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Kepailitan: Studi Putusan Nomor. 04/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu.Pailit/2018/Pn.Niaga Mks. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 1(5), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.52103/JLG.V1I5.197
Jaminan fidusia / Gunawan Widjaja & Ahmad Yani | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=605849
Kepailitan Suatu Solusi dalam Memaksimalkan Penagihan Piutang Kreditur | Slamet | Lex Jurnalica. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/316
Latukau, N., Winarno, B., Sudjito, B., Studi, P., & Kenotariatan, M. (n.d.). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITOR ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIBEBANI FIDUSIA ULANG OLEH DEBITOR YANG SAMA.
Lestari, P. P. I., & Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2020). PERLUASAN PENGATURAN PENGURUSAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(10), 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.V08.I10.P01
LUBIS, D. A. (2013). KEPAILITAN MENURUT IBNU RUSYD DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN HUKUM KEPAILITAN INDONESIA. Hukum Islam, 13(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.24014/HI.V13I2.18
Muwatta Malik - Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muwatta_Malik
Pengantar hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20137738
PENGARUH UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN KREDITUR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN APABILA DEBITUR PAILIT | Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/5268
Rusli, N. (1999). Konsep Ijtihad Al-Syaukani: Relevansinya Bagi Pembaruan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Logos Wacana Ilmu.
Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan : memahami undang-undang no. 37 tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran / Sutan Remy Sjahdeini | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16, 2022, from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1005653
Subekti. (1977). Aneka Perjanjian. Penerbit Alumni.
| 10.33650/at-turas.v9i1.3398 |
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Risma Nur Arifah
This journal is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License