Ottoman Millet System and its Significance to Contemporary Holistic Interreligious Dialogue

Abdullah Muslich Rizal Maulana, Sitti Amalia Musdalifah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v11i2.8474



Abstract

The issues of religious freedom and interreligious relations have been extensively debated. While the emergence of new theories and views often leads to the destruction of religious identity, in fact, tolerance and freedom lead to a strong religious identity. The Ottoman Turkish Empire, which once oversaw a third of the world's territory, presented a system that regulated existing differences. The system, named the Ottoman millet system, allegorized its people into religious communities to make it easier for religious believers to express their religious identity. The purpose of this study is to reveal the relevance of the system to the form of interreligious dialogue and harmony that occurs in the lives of religious communities. To reveal the answer fot this research question, the researcher used the content analysis method and the qualitative-phenomenological approach by looking at the object of research based on the phenomenon of how people under the Islamic rule of Ottoman Turkey as the subject of research could coexist despite coming from different nations and religions. The result found that the Ottoman millet system was implemented successfully because of the agreement of two elements in the state, namely its citizens in carrying out their obligations and the government that gave them their citizenship rights. The level of religiosity is one of the critical factors in applying this system in that era because of a deep understanding of tolerance between religious communities.



Keywords

Interreligious dialogue; ottoman millet system; tolerance; religious freedom.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ágoston, G., and Masters, B. A. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. New York, NY: Facts On File.

Albab, A. U. (2019). Interpretasi Dialog Antar Agama Dalam Berbagai Prespektif. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya, 2(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v2i1.223

Alifuddin, M., and Amir, A. M. (2022). Segregation of Religious Identity: An Ethnography of Religion Pluralism and Cultural Trauma in the Tolaki Communities. Al-Qalam, 28(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v28i2.1090

Barkey, K., and Gavrilis, G. (2016). The Ottoman Millet System: Non-Territorial Autonomy and its Contemporary Legacy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101845

Cheetham, D., Pratt, D., and Thomas, D. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding Interreligious Relations (1st ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cliteur, P., and Ellian, A. (2020). The Five Models for State and Religion: Atheism, Theocracy, State Church, Multiculturalism, and Secularism. ICL Journal, 14(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2018-0056

Cornille, C. (Ed.). (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Hoboken: Wiley.

Ergashev, I., and Farxodjonova, N. (2020). Integration of National Culture in the Process of Globalization. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(02). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.90

Erricker, C. (2002). Phenomenological Approaches. In P. Connolly (Ed.), Approaches to The Study of Religion (Reprinted, pp. 10–41). London: Continuum.

Esha, M. I. (2008). Hambatan dan Model Dialog Keagamaan di Era Kontemporer. El-Harakah, 10(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v10i2.4333

Fanani, A. F. (2011). The Ottoman Empire: Its Rise, Decline and Collapse. The Ottoman Empire, 14.

Fitriani, S. (2020). Keberagaman dan Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 20(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v20i2.5489

Fujinami, N. (2021). Defining Religion in a State that wasn’t: Autonomous Crete and the Question of Post-Ottoman Millet System. Journal of Church and State, 63(2), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csaa032

Gara, E. (2017). Conceptualizing Interreligious Relations in The Ottoman Empire: The Early Modern Centuries. Journal of Acta Poloniae Historica.

Gara, E. (2018). Conceptualizing Inter-religious Relations in the Ottoman Empire: The Early Modern Centuries. Acta Poloniae Historica, 116, 57. https://doi.org/10.12775/APH.2017.116.03

Ghozali, M., and Nugroho, W. (2020). Reviewing the Concept of Jizyah: a Theoretical Approach to History. Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah, 5(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.29313/amwaluna.v5i1.6363

Hakim, L. (2020). Hubungan Antar Agama pada Masa Kerajaan Usmani. Historia Madania: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah, 3(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.15575/hm.v3i1.9397

Hanfstingl, B., Arzenšek, A., Apschner, J., and Gölly, K. I. (2022). Assimilation and Accommodation: A Systematic Review of the Last Two Decades. European Psychologist, 27(4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000463

Hapsin, A. (2017). Religious Freedom and the Idea of Establishing Islamic State. Jurnal Walisongo, 25.

Junior, C. A. K. (2019). Religious Freedom as A Human Right: An International Overview Focusing on Brazil. 10(2).

King, S. B. (2010). Interreligious Dialogue. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34872/chapter/298327285

Körs, A., Weisse, W., and Willaime, J.-P. (Eds.). (2020). Religious Diversity and Interreligious Dialogue. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-31856-7

Leirvik, O. (2014). Interreligious Studies A Relational Approach to Religious Activism and the Study of Religion. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Marzuki, M. (2017). Penafsiran Millah dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Analisis Tafsir fi Zilalil-Qur’an. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Maulana, A. M. R. (2021). Problematika Pluralisme Agama Antara Teologi dan Filsafat: Membaca Kritik Marianne Moyaert atas John Hick. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat, 16(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v16i2.2136

Maulana, A. M. R. (2024). Ta‘āruf and Its Relevance to Interreligious Dialogue: A Semantic Analysis of Sūrat al-Ḥujurāt, Verse 13.

Maulana, A. M. R., Awaludin, A., and Fauzi, A. G. (2021). Reflecting Muslim-Christian Relations In Community Of Tegalrejo, Babadan-Ngancar-Kediri, 2019: Confronting Post-Truth. ‘Abqari Journal, 24(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol24no1.261

Maulana, A. M. R., Rachmawati, F., Imaniyyah, K., Fauziyyah, K., Shabrina, M. F. N., and Sari, S. E. R. (2023). Strategi FKUB Kota Bandung dalam Membangun Kerukunan Beragama demi Terciptanya Bandung Agamis: Suatu Studi Kasus. ARUMBAE: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi dan Studi Agama, 5(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.37429/arumbae.v5i1.935

Moyaert, M. (2011). Fragile Identities: Towards a Theology of Interreligious Hospitality. Amsterdam ; New York: Rodopi.

Moyaert, M. (Ed.). (2019). Interreligious Relations and the Negotiation of Ritual Boundaries: Explorations in Interrituality. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-05701-5

Nursapiah. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif (1st ed.). Medan: Wal Ashri Publishing.

Özcoşar, I. (2003). Osmanlı Devleti’nde Gayrimüslimlerin Hukuki Durumu ve Millet Sistemi. 7(7).

Purwadi, Y. S. (2023). Metafisika Keterbatasan dan Pluralisme Agama menurut John Hick. Jurnal Hanifiya, 6.

Rahman, C. M., and Fitriana, I. (2021). Analysis of Pax-Ottomanica in Minorities Society: A Case Study of Millet System. ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.19105/ejpis.v3i2.5296

Rahman, C. M., and Friatna, I. (2021). Analysis of Pax-Ottomanica in Minorities Society: A Case Study of Millet System. Jurnal Entita, 3. https://doi.org/10.19105/ejpis.v3i2.5296

Rasyidin, Y. (2020). Menjelajahi Pemikiran Politik Nurcholis Madjid Tentang Agama dan Negara. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 16(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v16i1.6840

Roberts, C. K. (2019). Reconceptualising the Place of the Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Sadzali, A. (2020). Hubungan Agama dan Negara di Indonesia: Polemik dan Implikasinya dalam Pembentukan dan Perubahan Konstitusi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 341–375. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.2.341-375

Shihab, M. Q. (2009). Tafsir Al-Misbah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Siddiqi, H. M. A., Sultana, M., Rehman, A. U., Shah, S. F. U. R., Batool, T., Qadr, H. K. A., … Akhter, S. (2023). Common Attributes of the Constitution of Madina and Magna Carta: Analytical Study from a Historical Perspective. Russian Law Journal, 11(10s). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i10s.1796

Stanton, A., Ramsamy, E., Seybolt, P., and Elliott, C. (2012). Cultural Sociology of the Middle East, Asia, & Africa: An Encyclopedia. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218458

Tanasă, R. (2021). Between “millet” and self-determination: The Ottoman-Armenian case. Universitas Alexandru Ioan Cuza.

Twiss, S. B., and Grelle, B. (Eds.). (1998). Explorations in Global Ethics: Comparative Religious Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue. Boulder, Colo. Oxford: Westview.

Upton-Ward, J. (2002). New Millennium Perspectives in the Humanities. Istanbul: Global Humanities Press.

Wijayanti, T. Y. (2019). Kebebasan Beragama dalam Islam. Jurnal Al-Aqidah, 11.

Žalec, B., and Pavlíková, M. (2019). Religious Tolerance and Intolerance. European Journal of Science and Theology.

Zarkasyi, H. F. (2021). Misykat (Refleksi Tentang Westernisasi, Liberalisasi, dan Islam) (5th ed.). Jakarta: INSISTS.

Zarkasyi, H. F., Thoha, A. M., Husaini, A., Armayanto, H., Dzulhadi, Q. N., Ulfa, M., … Suntoro, A. F. (2022). Pluralisme Agama (Dari Pandangan Hidup ke Praktik Kehidupan) (1st ed.). Ponorogo: CIOS.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/at-turas.v11i2.8474


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Abdullah Muslich Rizal Maulana, Sitti Amalia Musdalifah

This journal is licensed under a

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

P-ISSN: 2355-567X, E-ISSN: 2460-1063