TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF THE SCHOOL PRINCIPAL IN IMPROVING EDUCATOR QUALITY IN THE DIGITAL MODERNIZATION ERA AT SLB AT TANHID PAKEL, TULUNGAGUNG


Authors

(1) * Nur Hidayati   (Tribakti Lirboyo Islamic University, Kediri Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The current complex and global nature of digital development is driving significant digital transformation across various sectors of life, including education. This situation places the school principal at the forefront of managing change and enhancing educational quality in the digital era. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the transformational leadership of the school principal in improving educational quality in the digital era, using a case study at SLB At Tanhid Pakel, Tulungagung. Specifically, the study examines strategic transformational leadership measures and their impact on educational quality. A qualitative case study approach was employed. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and subsequently analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model—comprising data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing—with triangulation used to ensure data validity. The results indicate that the principal implemented digital transformation through the formulation of a school digital vision, mapping of teacher competencies, strengthening of technological infrastructure, creation of an innovation culture, and development of an adaptive curriculum. Transformational leadership was shown to have a significant impact on enhancing teacher competence, optimizing digital learning, improving student achievement, fostering a collaborative work culture, and ensuring school readiness to face educational challenges in the digital era.



Keywords

Leadership, Transformational, School Principal, Educational Quality, Digital Era.



Full Text: PDF



References


Artanto, Dicky. “Strategi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Pendidikan Islam.” Adaara: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 2. 2022.

Arikunto ,Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2006.

Fredricks, Jennifer A, Phyllis C Blumenfeld, and Alison H Paris. “School Engagement : Potential of the Concept , State of the Evidence” 74, no. 1 2004.

Ghony, Djunaidi.M. & Almanshur, Fauzan. Metodologi penelitain kualitatif. Yogyakarta. ar-ruzz media, 2012.

Goleman, D. & Boyatzis, R. Kepemimpinan Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Emosi. Terjemahan oleh Susi Purwoko. Jakarta: Gramdia Pustaka Utama. 2004.

Hasan, Muh. Tolchah dkk. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Tinjauan Teori dan Praktik. Surabaya: Visipers Offset. 2003.

Islamiyah, Devi Fitriah, Benny Prasetiya, and Zohaib Hassan Sain. “Transformative Leadership in Islamic Religious Education at Raudhatul Athfal: Advancing Competitive Islamic Management in Probolinggo, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Education Research 5, no. 3 2024.

Miles M.B dan Huberman A. MIkel, Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication, 1992.

Mundiri, A., Julaiha, S., Duraesa, M. A., & Embong, R. (2026). Exploring The Transformative Zone of Tolerance in Indigenous Education: Insights from Pesantren-Based Services. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 448–464.

Sa’idah, H., & Huda, N. (2026). A Fiqh Muamalah Analysis of Contractual Practices in the E-Bekal Payment System at Nurul Jadid Islamic Boarding School. Indonesian Journal Economic Review, 6(2), 540–548.

Suhermanto. (2025). Principal Leadership Strategies for Enhancing Teacher Performance in Islamic Schools. Journal of Educational Management Research (Vol.04/No.05/2025), 4(Journal of Educational Management Resear), 1886–1898.

Syamsul, K., Affan, M., Somad, A., & Baharun, H. (2026). Digital Ethics and Spirituality From an Islamic Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review. TADIB: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(1), 179–194.

Tim Redaksi Kamus Besar Bahasa. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.

Yukl, Gary. “An Evaluation of Conceptual Weaknesses in Transformational and Charismatic Leadership Theories.” Leadership Quarterly 10, no. 2 1999.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Hidayati