COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP MODEL IN ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE OF PRIVATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITIES


Authors

(1) * Muhammad Alwi   (State Islamic Institute of Parepare , South Sulawesi , Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Abdul Halik   (State Islamic Institute of Parepare , South Sulawesi , Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Muhammad Tasbih   (State Islamic Institute of Parepare , South Sulawesi , Indonesia)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyze collaborative leadership practices and formulate a leadership model developed within the academic governance of Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad (STAI DDI) Pinrang. The study employed a qualitative approach with a single-case study design. Informants were selected purposively and included institutional leaders, academic unit heads, lecturers, administrative staff, and other institutional actors involved in academic decision-making. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observations, and document analysis. Data analysis is carried out interactively through the stages of data condensation, data presentation, conclusion drawn, and verification, while data validity is carried out through triangulation of sources and techniques as well as member checking. The findings reveal that the collaborative leadership model at STAI DDI Pinrang is constructed through the integration of four main dimensions: facilitative and relational leadership, participatory academic decision-making, the internalization of prophetic values and ethical role modelling, and strengthened accountability through continuous evaluation and internal quality assurance. The model was not formally or normatively designed but emerged contextually through leadership practices that reduced hierarchical distance, built trust, expanded stakeholder participation, and fostered collective responsibility. The integration of these dimensions resulted in academic governance that was more collaborative, accountable, adaptive, and oriented toward continuous improvement. This study proposes a prophetic value-based collaborative leadership model that may serve as a relevant framework for strengthening academic governance in private Islamic higher education institutions.


Keywords

Collaborative Leadership, Prophetic Values, Academic Governance.



Full Text: PDF



References


Amelia, R., Saepudin, M. F., & Asy’ari, H. (2025). Followership Dan Kepemimpinan Sukses Di Institusi Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kolaboratif Untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Kepemimpinan. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 3554–3558.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. Innovation Journal, 17(1).

Areiqat, A. Y., Zamil, A. M., Fatḥi, A., Ahmad, M. M., & Abushaar, H. M. (2020). The concept of governance in universities: Reality and ambition. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 951–969.

Arifin, M. A. M. (2025). Menganalisis Standar Pendidikan Mutu Nasional dan Internasional: Tantangan, Implementasi, dan Strategi Peningkatan di Era Globalisasi. Al-Mudabbir: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 1(2), 210–216.

Arifin, Z., Hepni, H., & Anwar, M. (2024). Strategy for Improving the Quality of Islamic Higher Education Management in the Independent Curriculum Era. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(1), 497–506.https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i1.5011

Asyari, H., Sukarti, D., Ratnaningsih, S., & Azizah, N. R. (2023). Readiness of Study Programs in Achieving Superior Accreditation Ratings: An Analysis Using the CIPPO Evaluation Model. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 10(2), 251–268.https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v10i2.39885

Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2014). Leadership for the common good: creating regimes of mutual gain. In Transforming public leadership for the 21st century (pp. 185–202). Routledge.

Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education.

Christensen, I. (2024). Understanding tradeoffs in the institutional design and leadership of collaborative governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(2), 263–290.

Creswell John and Creswell David. (2023). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications,Inc.: Vol. Sixth Edit (Issue 1).

Deni, M. (2022). Strategic management of higher college in improving the quality of education STIKES Health Darussalam Lhokseumawe Aceh. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 5(4), 246–252.https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v5n4.1962

Dopson, S., Ferlie, E., McGivern, G., Fischer, M. D., Mitra, M., Ledger, J., & Behrens, S. (2019). Leadership development in higher education: A literature review and implications for programme redesign. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(2), 218–234.https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12194

Faishol, L. (2020). Kepemimpinan profetik dalam pendidikan islam. Eduprof: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 39–53.https://doi.org/10.47453/eduprof.v2i1.30

Geschwind, L., Aarrevaara, T., Berg, L. N., & Lind, J. K. (2019). The changing roles of academic leaders: Decision-making, power, and performance. In Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education: A comparative account from the Nordic countries (pp. 181–210). Springer International Publishing Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11738-2

Hassan, M. E. M., Muhamad, N., Abdullah, N. A., & Adham, K. A. (2011). Islamic values, leadership legitimacy and organizational sustainability. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v19i2.181

Martono, S., & Wijayanto, A. (2014). Peningkatan Efektivitas Program Studi di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Melalui Kepemimpinan Adaptif Integratif. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 5(1).https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v5i1

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd (ed.)). Sage Publications.

Montgomery, B. L. (2020). Academic leadership: gatekeeping or groundskeeping? The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 13(2), 16.https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.132.1316

Muhammad, S. (2014). Kepemimpinan Dalam Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, 2(3), 56–67.

Nafal, Q., Sokip, S., & Syafi’i, A. (2024). Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 2(5), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v2i5.497

Nuraini, S., Fahmi, R., & Yusriadi, A. (2023). Leadership dynamics in school innovation: A qualitative perspective. Jurnal Transformasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 66–80.

Parrish, D. R. (2015). The relevance of emotional intelligence for leadership in a higher education context. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 821–837.https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842225

Riana, K. E., & Hadiwidjaja, R. D. (2024). Good university governance to universities performance: Systematic literature review. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 4(5), 4229–4243.https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i5.1289

Sa’adah, M., Dui, R., Nikmah, T. I., Auldina, B., Sa’adah, M., Amalia, N. N., & Mualimin, M. (2025). The Strategic Role of Human Resource Management in Improving the Performance of Educational Organizations: A Literature Review. Khalifah: Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara, 3(1), 9–17.https://doi.org/10.62523/khalifah.v3i1.70

Spalanzani, A., & Zouaghi, I. (2025). Navigating the academic landscape: understanding university dynamics, challenges, and strategic responses. Journal of Management and Business Education, 8(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2025.0010

VanVactor, J. D. (2012). Collaborative leadership model in the management of health care. Journal of Business Research, 65(4), 555–561.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.021

Yudiawan, A., & Himmah, A. (2023). Quality Management Transformation Of Islamic Religious Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal Of Quality Assurance In Islamic Education (JQAIE), 3(2), 118–133.https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v3i2.1200




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Alwi