Students' perceptions on the Use of Paralanguage in EFL Classrooms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v7i2.12655

Authors (s)


(1)  Alfian Sandy William Kok   (Universitas Timor)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Mikhael Misa   (Universitas Timor)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Edmundus Bouk   (Universitas Timor)  
        Indonesia
(4) * Yanuarius Seran   (Universitas Timor)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examined students’ perceptions of English language teachers’ use of paralanguage in schools on the border between Indonesia and Timor Leste, specifically examining its impact on students’ engagement and comprehension in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) environment. Paralanguage—encompassing vocal qualities such as pitch, pitch, volume, and rate of speech—plays a critical yet often overlooked role in effective communication, especially in a language learning environment where non-verbal cues can significantly impact students’ comprehension. Through qualitative methods, including observation and semi-structured interviews with students at SMA Fides Quarens Intellectum and SMA Negeri 2 Kefamenanu, this study investigated how students interpreted their teachers’ paralinguistic cues and how these cues influenced their learning experiences. The findings revealed that students perceived paralanguage as a valuable tool for enhancing clarity and emotional connection in the classroom, aiding their comprehension and encouraging active participation. Elements such as pitch modulation and vocal emphasis were shown to help students understand important information and stay engaged, while balanced vocal qualities created a supportive and engaging classroom atmosphere. Furthermore, this study highlights the role of paralanguage in reducing student anxiety and increasing self-confidence, which is particularly relevant in cross-cultural educational settings where language barriers and cultural differences can hinder effective communication. These insights underscore the importance of incorporating paralanguage awareness into teacher training programs, suggesting that the intentional use of vocal cues can enhance instructional effectiveness and support student language acquisition.



Keywords

Paralanguage, Students, Perception, Communication, EFL



Full Text: PDF



References


Adeyemo, S. A. (2011). The effect of teachers’ perception and students’ perception of physics classroom learning environment on their academic achievement in senior secondary schools physics. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(1), 74-81.

Arima, S. (2020). Ellite Journal of Education, Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching students perception on the teacher’s nonverbal communication at the seventh grade students of mtss nagari binjai pasaman. 1–13.

Ayuningsih, A. A., Mahmud, M., Salija, K., & Muhayyang, M. (2022). Teachers’ Paralanguage in Classroom Interaction. A, 15(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v15i1.14127

Azzahra, Y., Muhayyang, M., & Korompot, C. A. (2022). The Impacts of Teachers’ Paralanguage in EFL Classroom. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education, 1(3).

Delmonico, A. (2023). Recognizing Paralanguage in Teaching. The Downtown Review, 9(2), 1–6. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=tdr

Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(1), 33-39.

Gantiano, H. E. (2020). Analisis Dampak Strategi Komunikasi Non Verbal. Dharma Duta, 17(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.33363/dd.v17i2.392

Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Sensation and perception. (pp. 8-26). Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Isnani, N. (2021). The Influence of English Teacher’s Nonverbal Interaction on EFL Students’ Perception of Learning. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22515/ele-reviews.v1i1.3404

Istiqamah, I., Baa, S., & Samtidar, S. (2023). Teachers’ Non-Verbal Communication Influencing Students’ Motivation in Learning English for the Young Learners. Klasikal : Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v5i1.611

Khalifa, E. M., & Faddal, H. (2017). Impacts of Using Paralanguage on Teaching and Learning English Language to Convey Effective Meaning. Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v5n2p295

Komariah, C. (2017). Teacher’s and students’ nonverbal communication in efl classroom (A Case Study at the Ninth Grade Students of Modern Pesantren of Daarul Uluum Lido, Bogor) A THESIS Presented as Partial Requirement for a Completion of Master’s Degree. 2113014000011, 117.

Mahadi, U. (2021). Komunikasi Pendidikan (Urgensi Komunikasi Efektif dalam Proses Pembelajaran). JOPPAS: Journal of Public Policy and Administration Silampari, 2(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.31539/joppa.v2i2.2385

Misa, M (2023). Multiliteracies pedagogy: A case study of critical reading in elt classroom by implementing siatuated practice. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(2), 489-500.

Purnama Sari, P., & Marlina, M. (2021). Bentuk komunikasi nonverbal guru dalam proses belajar mengajar bagi siswa tunarungu. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, JPK, 17(2), 62–71. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpk

Rahman, A. A. (2013). Psikologi sosial integrasi pengetahuan wahyu dan pengetahuan empirik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Rohmah, L. (2020). Studi tentang Persepsi Siswa EFL Pada Interaksi Nonverbal Guru Bahasa Inggris Di MAN 1 Bengkalis. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 282–289. https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/semnas2020/article/view/7414%0Ahttps://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/semnas2020/article/download/7414/3464

Slameto. (2013). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Rusandi, & Muhammad Rusli. (2021). Merancang Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar/Deskriptif dan Studi Kasus. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v2i1.18

Sugiyono, P. D. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D–MPKK–Toko Buku Bandung. CV. Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta. com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk.

Wicaksono, L. (2016). Bahasa Dalam Komunikasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Prospektif, 1(2), 9–19. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m%0Ahttp://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m/article/download/19211/16053


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijoeel.v7i2.12655


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Alfian Sandy William Kok, Mikhael Misa, Edmundus Bouk, Yanuarius Seran