Utilizing MBTI to Enhance Career Fit for Information Technology Students

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jeecom.v8i1.14616
Authors

(1) * Wildan Mualim   (Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Yadika Pasuruan)  
        Indonesia
(2)  M. Fatkhur Roji   (Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Yadika Pasuruan)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Nathania Bayu Astrella   (Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Yadika Pasuruan)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A significant challenge faced by students in Information Technology (IT) programs is the mismatch between their personality traits and career paths. Many students struggle to determine the right career trajectory in the IT industry, often choosing based on market trends or peer influence rather than considering the alignment of their personality with job requirements. The lack of a psychometric-based counseling system to help align personality with career choices further exacerbates this issue. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to align students' personalities with their career preferences. The research was conducted with a sample of 80 final-year students from the Information Technology and Systems program at Yadika Institute of Technology and Business Pasuruan. The findings revealed that the majority of students exhibited introverted personality traits, with INFP and INTP being the most common types. A statistically significant correlation was found between MBTI types and preferred career fields. For instance, students with INFP and INTP types leaned toward creative and analytical professions such as UI/UX design, software engineering, and data science, while ESTJ types favored managerial roles. Additionally, 73% of students reported high satisfaction with the career recommendations provided based on their MBTI results. This research supports the use of MBTI as an effective tool for career counseling, offering a more personalized approach to career decision-making.


Keywords

MBTI; Personality types; Job fit; Student Satisfaction; Technology Student



Full Text: PDF



References


I. B. Myers, M. H. McCaulley, N. L. Quenk, and A. L. Hammer, MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Mountain View, CA, USA: CPP, Inc., 2003.

G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, and G. Matthews, Eds., Personality Theories and Models: An Overview, vol. 1, The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin, Eds., Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press, 2019.

P. T. Costa and R. R. McCrae, “The five-factor model of personality and career preferences,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2018.

A. Furnham and J. Crump, “Personality traits and occupational success,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 272–284, 2020.

A. Hirschi, “Personality traits and career decision-making: A meta-analytic review,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 126, pp. 103–115, 2021.

J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

R. D. Duffy, K. L. Autin, and R. P. Douglass, “The role of personality in career success: The MBTI as a predictive tool,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 133, p. 103658, 2022.

J. P. Smith, H. McGregor, and Y. Liu, “Personality traits and career outcomes in the technology sector: A five-year study,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 499–520, 2021.

M. T. Jones and L. Hernandez, “Utilizing personality assessments for career decision-making in higher education,” Journal of Career Development, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 381–397, 2019.

D. J. Pittenger, “The MBTI and beyond: Critiques and future directions,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 199, p. 111896, 2023.

J. C. Lee and S. H. Kim, “Personality traits and software engineering career preferences,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 178, p. 110991, 2021

T. A. Judge, R. F. Piccolo, and T. Kosalka, “The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 421–458, 2020, doi: 10.1111/peps.12317.

M. A. Dev and N. B. Arlı, “The role of personality traits and decision-making styles in career decision-making difficulties,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 159, 2025, doi: 10.3390/bs15020159.

A. M. Grant, “Rethinking typological personality assessment: Limitations of categorical models,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 168, p. 110365, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110365.

S. Panigrahi, R. K. Behera, and M. Dash, “Personality assessment in higher education and its implications for employability,” Journal of Education and Work, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 748–765, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2023.2198765.

Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2020). Career decision making, fast and slow: Toward an integrative model of intervention for sustainable career choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103448. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103448

Kleine, A.-K., Schmitt, A., & Wisse, B. (2021). Students’ career exploration: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103645. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103645


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jeecom.v8i1.14616


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Wildan Mualim

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer (JEECOM)
Published by LP3M Nurul Jadid University, Indonesia, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.