Enhancing User Experience in a Land Transportation Information Application: A Design Thinking Approach to the GOBIS Application

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jeecom.v8i2.16994
Authors

(1) * Lisana Lisana   (University of Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Melissa Angga   (University of Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Eugenia Caitlyn Cristabella   (University of Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


GOBIS is a digital transportation application developed by the Surabaya City Government to facilitate public access to public transportation services. As a land transportation information system, GOBIS plays an important role in providing route, bus stop, and fleet information for urban mobility. However, user reviews and usability test results indicate that the current version of the application still has several shortcomings, particularly in interface design and user experience. The main issues include a difficult-to-interpret integrated map, the absence of an automatic route-search feature, and unclear information about bus stops and fleets. This study developed a redesigned GOBIS prototype through the five-stage Design Thinking process and evaluated the existing application and the redesigned prototype using the same task scenarios. Effectiveness was measured by task completion rate, efficiency by time-based efficiency, and perceived user experience by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). The redesigned prototype increased task completion from 52% to 92%, representing a 40-percentage-point improvement, and increased time-based efficiency from 0.008 to 0.104 goals/sec. User satisfaction also improved after the redesign. Furthermore, assessment with the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) showed that all dimensions fell within the “excellent” category. These findings indicate that the redesigned interface successfully improves the overall quality of user interaction and enhances the user experience of GOBIS as a land transportation information system.


Keywords

Design Thinking; User Experience; Land Transportation; Information System; GOBIS Application



Full Text: PDF



References


“Surabaya traffic report | TomTom Traffic Index,” TomTom Traffic Index, 2026. https://www.tomtom.com/traffic-index/city/surabaya/.

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia, “Perkembangan Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis - Tabel Statistik,” Bps.go.id, 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NTcjMg==/perkembangan-jumlah-kendaraan-bermotor-menurut-jenis--unit-.html.

G. G. Pamula, H. Christy, C. H. Syahnufi, J. Natalia, & M. S. Tondok, “Urban Public Perceptions and Usage of the ‘Wira-Wiri Suroboyo’ Feeder: Insights from the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Psychological Research on Urban Society, vol. 8, no. 2, Oct. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v8i2.1207.

N. Hemidli, “Introduction to UI/UX Design: Key Concepts and Principles,” www.academia.edu, Mar. 2023, Available: https://www.academia.edu/98036432/Introduction_to_UI_UX_Design_Key_Concepts_and_Principles.

F. Estes, Design Thinking. Twenty-First Century Books TM, 2025.

X. Zhang et al., “Research on the Effect of Design Thinking on Enterprise Sustainable Innovation Ability and Team Performance,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4428–4428, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114428.

J. Johnson, Designing with the Mind in Mind: simple guide to understanding user interface design guidelines. S.L.: Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, 2020.

E. Rosenzweig, Successful User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, 2025.

J. Nielsen, “Usability 101: Introduction to usability,” Nielsen Norman Group, Jan. 03, 2012. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

L. A. Awang, F. D. Yusop, and M. Danaee, “Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathematics,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 19, no. 3, p. em0782, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14621.

J. Sauro, “MeasuringU: What Is A Good Task-Completion Rate?,” Measuringu.com, 2011. https://measuringu.com/task-completion/

J. Mifsud, “Usability Metrics - A Guide To Quantify The Usability Of Any System - Usability Geek,” Usability Geek, Jun. 23, 2018. https://usabilitygeek.com/usability-metrics-a-guide-to-quantify-system-usability/

UEQ, “User experience questionnaire (UEQ),” Ueq-online.org, 2018. https://www.ueq-online.org/.

M. Schrepp, A. Hinderks, and ThomaschewskiJ., “Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ),” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 40, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445.

J. Nielsen, “Why you only need to test with 5 users,” Nielsen Norman Group, Mar. 18, 2000. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/.

Syifaul Fuada, Endah Setyowati, Nissa Restyasari, Y. M. Heong, and Leonardi Paris Hasugian, “UI/UX Redesign of SH-UPI App Using Design Thinking Framework,” JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1055–1055, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3.2094.

I. Darmawan, M. S. Anwar, A. Rahmatulloh, and H. Sulastri, “Design Thinking Approach for User Interface Design and User Experience on Campus Academic Information Systems,” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 327–334, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.2.997.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jeecom.v8i2.16994


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Lisana Lisana, Melissa Angga, Eugenia Caitlyn Cristabella

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer (JEECOM)
Published by LP3M Nurul Jadid University, Indonesia, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.