Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models for Peak Load Forecasting in Distribution Feeders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jeecom.v8i3.17037
Authors

(1) * Titiek Suheta   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Misbahul Munir   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Achmad David Julianto   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Muhammad Iqbal Zakaria   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Rhesa Ardra Nugraha   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(6)  Faisal Yusana   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(7)  Acok Ahdillah Usman Almah   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(8)  Novendra L Rivaldo Bere   (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Peak load forecasting provides essential information for planning and operating electrical distribution systems. This study investigates the forecasting performance of linear and quadratic polynomial regression models using monthly historical load observations from seven distribution feeders over the 2021–2022 period. To account for differences in loading patterns, each feeder was analysed independently. The linear model uses the time index as the predictor, whereas the quadratic polynomial approach is represented by a second-order polynomial regression. Model accuracy was assessed using Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results reveal variations in forecasting performance among the feeders. In general, quadratic polynomial regression yields slightly lower RMSE values, although the relative performance based on MAPE and R² differs across feeders. The differences between the two approaches are relatively small for most feeders, suggesting that greater model complexity does not necessarily provide a substantial improvement in forecasting accuracy. These findings highlight the importance of considering feeder-specific load characteristics and multiple evaluation indicators when selecting a forecasting model. Overall, the proposed approach offers a simple and computationally efficient alternative for feeder-level peak load forecasting based solely on historical load information.


Keywords

peak load; distribution feeder; load forecasting; linear regression; nonlinear regression



Full Text: PDF



References


K. Fida, U. Abbasi, M. Adnan, and S. Iqbal, “Results in Engineering Review article A comprehensive survey on load forecasting hybrid models : Navigating the Futuristic demand response patterns through experts and intelligent systems,” Results Eng., vol. 23, no. June, p. 102773, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102773.

M. Hasan et al., “Energy Conversion and Management : X A state-of-the-art comparative review of load forecasting methods : Characteristics , perspectives , and applications,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 26, no. February, p. 100922, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100922.

X. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Bai, Z. Zhu, and A. Xia, “Online short-term load forecasting methods using hybrids of single multiplicative neuron model , particle swarm optimization variants and nonlinear filters,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 683–692, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.030.

E. O. Jnr, Y. Yevenyo, and S. Relvas, “Hybrid ensemble intelligent model based on wavelet transform , swarm intelligence and artificial neural network for electricity demand forecasting,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 66, no. October 2020, p. 102679, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102679.

N. Elamin and M. Fukushige, “Modeling and forecasting hourly electricity demand by SARIMAX with interactions,” Energy, vol. 165, pp. 257–268, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.157.

Q. Dong and R. Huang, “Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Short-Term Electricity-Load Forecasting by deep learning : A comprehensive survey,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 154, no. December 2024, p. 110980, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110980.

A. Jain and S. C. Gupta, “Evaluation of electrical load demand forecasting using various machine learning algorithms,” no. June, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1408119.

D. Vlah, A. Kastrin, J. Povh, and N. Vuka, “Advanced Engineering Informatics Data-driven engineering design : A systematic review using scientometric approach,” vol. 54, no. October, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101774.

A. Setiawan, “Enhancing Medium-Term Load Forecasting Accuracy in Post-Pandemic Tropical Regions : A Comparative Analysis of Polynomial Regression , Split Polynomial Regression , and LSTM Networks,” 2025.

V. Y. Kondaiah, “A review on short‐term load forecasting models for micro‐grid application.pdf,” 2022. doi: DOI: 10.1049/tje2.12151 Revised:

G. Lee, “A Regression-Based Method for Monthly Electric Load Forecasting in South Korea,” Energies, vol. 17, p. 2 of 16, 2024, doi: doi.org/10.3390/en17235860.

B. Dhaval and A. Deshpande, “Short-term load forecasting with using multiple linear regression,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3911–3917, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v10i4.pp3911-3917.

K. Bayu, D. R. Henidar, F. Hermastiandi, G. P. N, and A. Nugraha, “Forecasting Electrical Energy Loads at PT Krakatau Daya Electric Using the Linear Regression Method,” J. Mechatronics Artif. Intell. Homepage, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jmai/

J. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Tian, K. Burrage, and T. Cao, “Support vector regression with asymmetric loss for optimal electric load forecasting,” Energy, vol. 223, p. 119969, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119969.

A. Kamoona et al., “Machine learning based energy demand prediction ☆,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, no. S12, pp. 171–176, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.151.

A. Mathew, R. Chikte, S. K. Sadanandan, S. Abdelaziz, and S. Ijaz, “Medium-term feeder load forecasting and boosting peak accuracy prediction using the PWP-XGBoost model,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 237, no. September, p. 111051, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111051.

K. Misiurek and T. Olkuski, “Review of Methods and Models for Forecasting Electricity Consumption,” Energies, vol. 18, p. 2 0f 27, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ en18154032.

Y. Zhou and W. Wang, “MLFGCN : short-term residential load forecasting via graph attention temporal convolution network,” vol. 2023, no. September, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1461403.

P. Koukaras, “Short-Term Load Forecasting in the Greek Power Distribution System : A Comparative Study of Gradient Boosting and Deep Learning Models,” pp. 1–27, 2025.

G. Tziolis et al., “Short-term electric net load forecasting for solar-integrated distribution systems based on Bayesian neural networks and statistical post-processing,” Energy, vol. 271, no. February, p. 127018, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127018.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jeecom.v8i3.17037


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Titiek Suheta

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer (JEECOM)
Published by LP3M Nurul Jadid University, Indonesia, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.