.png){kind=logo}
RATIONALIZATION OF THE NUSANTARA TAFSIR AND THE MIDDLE EAST: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE INTERPRETATION OF AL-FĀTIHAH BY KH. ZAINI MUN’IM AND AHMAD MUST{AFĀ AL-MARĀGHĪ
AbstractThe interpretation of the Qur’an continues to develop following the social, cultural, and geographical context—the interpretations of KH. Zaini Mun’im and Al-Marāghī have different characteristics and methods for understanding QS. Al-Fātihah. KH. Zaini Mun’im combines the bi al-ra’yi and Sufi approaches, while Al-Marāghī is known for his systematic and rational adabī ijtimā’ī style. Debates have arisen regarding the extent to which the rationality of the interpretations of Nusantara scholars can be compared with Middle Eastern scholars. This study analyzes the rationalization of KH Zaini Mun’im’s interpretation of Surah Al-Fātihah in Tafsīr Bi al-Imlā’ and Ahmad Musthafa Al-Marāghī in Tafsir Al-Marāghī. Another objective is to identify the uniqueness and characteristics of both interpretations and their relevance to the context of Nusantara society. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research approach. Data were obtained from primary sources in the form of Tafsīr Bi al-Imlā’ by KH. Zaini Mun’im and Tafsir Al-Marāghī by Ahmad Musthafa Al-Marāghī, as well as secondary sources in the form of books, journals, articles, and previous research. The analysis technique used is the comparative descriptive-analytical method. The results of the study indicate that both interpretations have similarities in the use of the tahlīlī method, but differ in approach. Tafsir Al-Marāghī uses the adabī ijtimā’ī style with simple and easy-to-understand language, while KH. Zaini Mun’im emphasizes the Sufi and contextual approach with a communicative language style—the interpretation of KH. Zaini Mun’im has a stronger relevance to the reality of Nusantara society. Finally, this study confirms the interpretation of Nusantara scholars, such as KH. Zaini Mun’im has rationality and contributions that are equal to the interpretation of Middle Eastern scholars. This can reduce the stigma of inferiority of Nusantara interpretation and add to the treasury of knowledge in the study of the Qur’an interpretation
|
Keywords
Full Text:
References
Al-Dhahabi, M. H. (2007). Al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun. Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Dimasyqi, A. al-F. I. bin U. bin K. al-Q. (2000). Tafsir al- Qur’an al-Adhim. Dar Ibnu Hazm.
Al-Farmawi, A. A.-H. (1977). Al-Bidayah Fi Al-Tafsir Al-Mawdu’i: Dirasah Manhajiyyah Mawduiyyah. Al-Hadarat Al-Gharbiyyah.
Al-Marāghī, A. M. (2001). Tafsir Al-Marāghī. Maktabah Musthafa al-Jailāni.
Basid, A., & Soleh, A. K. (2024). Contextualization of the Umminess of the Prophet Muhammad in the Qur’an: An Analysis of The Burhani Epistemology of Muhammad Abed Al-Jabiri. At-Turāṡ: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 11(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v11i2.8355
Basuki, D. R., & Federspiel, H. M. (1996). Kajian al-Quran di Indonesia: dari Mahmud Yunus hingga Quraish Shihab. Mizan.
Chodjim, A. (2003). Al-Fātihah: Membuka Mata Batin Dengan Surah Pembuka. Serambi.
Erliyanto, M. (2024). Sejarah Pemikiran Sumber Ajaran Islam Dan Pendidikan Islam. Cognitive: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 19–42.
Fawaid, A. (2019). Filologi Naskah Tafsîr Bi Al-Imlâ’ Surat Al-Baqarah Karya Kyai Zaini Mun’Im. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 20(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2019.2002-02
Fithrotin. (2018). Metodologi Dan Karakteristik Penafsiran Ahmad Mustafa Al Maraghi Dalam Kitab Tafsir Al Maraghi (Kajian Atas QS. Al Hujurat Ayat: 9). Al-Furqon, 1(2), 107–120.
Ghofur, S. A. (2008). Profil Para Musafir Al-Quran. Pustaka Insan Madani.
Ghozali, M. (2018). Modifikasi Tafsir Nusantara Perspektif al-Thabit wa al-Muthawwil (Studi Tentang Eksistensi Tradisi Ke-Indonesiaan dalam Tafsir al-Ibriz Karya Bisri Mustafa). UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Gusmian, I. (2013). Khazanah Tafsir di Indonesia. LKiS.
Kattsoff, L. O. (1996). Pengantar Filsafat. Tiara Wacana.
Mun’im, A. R. Z., & Fadhila, F. (2021). Concept of Ummatan Wasatan in the Qur’an (Comparative Studies of Tafsīr Al-Marāghī and Tafsīr Al-Qur’Ān Bi Al-Imlā’ By Kh. Zaini Abdul Mun’Im). Mushaf: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan KeindonesiaanF Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan, 1(2), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.33650/mushaf.v1i2.2164
Mun’im, Z. (2004). Tafsir Surat Al-Fātihah. FORSTUDIA.
Muttaqin, K. (2020). Konsep Hidayah Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Bi al-imlā’’ Karya Kiai Zaini Mun’im. REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur`an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.19105/revelatia.v1i1.3158
Nasution, H. (1992). Ensiklopedi Islam Indonesia. Penerbit Djambatan.
Nisa, Z., & Masrury, F. (2024). Dinamika Kesejahteraan Jiwa Dalam Praktik Self Healing Perspektif Tafsir Al-Marāghī. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i2.1569
Prasasti, E. N. (2021). Tabarruj Menurut Ahmad Mustafa al-Maragi dalam Kitab Tafsir Al-Marāghī. IAIN Bengkulu.
Ridwan, A., Jannah, F., & Gunawan, G. (2022). Kontribusi Abdur Rauf As-Singkili Terhadap Pendidikan Islam. EDU-RILIGIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Dan Keagamaan, 6(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.47006/er.v6i2.13217
Sampurno, M. (2024). Nahdlatul Turats: Gerakan Filologi Islam dalam Melacak Jaringan Keilmuan Ulama Nusantara. Muttaqien: Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies, 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.52593/mtq.05.1.02
Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir Al-Misbah (Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an) (1st ed.). Lentera Hati.
Shihab, M. Q. (2005). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an (5th ed.). Lentera Hati.
| 10.33650/mushaf.v4i1.9233 |
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Mas'ud Ubaidillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This ejournal system and it's contents licensed under
