The Effect of Distance Education: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Simonson's Equity Theory based on Synchronous and Asynchronous

Roger S. Bensilva, Phill F. Abraham, Annie Y. William
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijit.v1i1.3429



Abstract

Simonson, Schlosser and Hanson (1999) argue that a new theory called “equivalency theory” is needed to account for the unique features of the “teleconferencing” (synchronous) model of DE that is prevalent in many North American universities. Based on a comprehensive meta-analysis of the comparative literature of DE (Bernard, Abrami, Lou, Wozney, Borokhovski, Wallet, Wade, Fiset, & Huang, in press), we are able to assess empirically whether equivalency has been achieved in prior comparative DE research. This paper includes a brief summary of the results of the split between synchronous and asynchronous patterns of DE, and addresses the implications these data have for developing separate theories of DE for synchronous (i.e., group-based) and asynchronous (i.e., individualized) applications. We examine data based on achievement, attitude and retention outcomes and coded study features (i.e., methodological, pedagogical and media) relating to them.

Keywords

synchronous distance education , asynchronous distance education, meta-analytical assessment, simonson’s equivalency theory

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abrami, P. C., Cohen, P., & d’Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 58, 151–179.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y. & Borokhovski, E. (in press). A methodological morass? How we can improve the quality of quantitative research in distance education. Distance Education.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Wozney, L., Borokhovski, E., Wallet, P. A., Wade, A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (in press). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-Analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research.

Bernard, R. M., & Naidu, S. (1990). Integrating research into practice: The use and abuse of meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 19, 171–195.

Bernard, R. M., & Amundsen, C. L. (1989). Antecedents to dropout in distance education: Does one model fit all? Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 25-46.

Carpenter, C. R., & Greenhill, L. P. (1955 & 1958). An investigation of closed-circuit television for teaching university courses (Reports 1 & 2). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445– 459.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

Cobb, T. (1997). Cognitive efficiency: Toward a revised theory of media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 21-35.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Hedges, L. V., Shymansky, J. A., & Woodworth, G. (1989). A practical guide to modern methods of metaanalysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 952) Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education. (3rd Ed). London: Routledge

Mottet, T. P. (1998). Interactive television instructors = perceptions of students = nonverbal responsiveness and effects on distance teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(02), 460A. (University Microfilms No. AAT98-24007)

Ostendorf, V. A. (1997). Teaching by television [Theme issue: Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no.1, 51-58.

Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.

Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion. American Journal of Distance Education; (13) 1,60-75.

Ullmer, E. J. (1994). Media and learning: Are there two kinds of truth? Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(1), 21-32.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijit.v1i1.3429


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Roger S. Bensilva, Phill F. Abraham, Annie Y. William

International Journal of Instructional Technology
Published by Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M)
Universitas Nurul Jadid, Karanganyar, Paiton, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 67291
Phone: 0888-30-77077; 08231-800-79-53
Website: https://lp3m.unuja.ac.id/
Email: ijit.lp3m@unuja.ac.id

P-ISSN: 2828-867X | E-ISSN: 2828-9145

This ejournal system and its contents are licensed under

a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.