Reason and Revelation in the Tafsir Al-Kashshaf: Mu'tazilah's Study of the Verses of Tanzih I'tiqodiyah
AbstractThe study of Qur'anic interpretation continues to develop along with the dynamics of Islamic thought, one of which is through the pattern of kalām interpretation developed by the Mu'tazilah. Tafsir al-Kashshāf by al-Zamakhsharī is one of the main representations of the Mu'tazilah rational approach in understanding the verses of tanzīh i'tiqādiyyah. This study aims to analyze the epistemological relationship between reason and revelation in the interpretation, especially in interpreting the concepts of divinity, divine justice, and human free will. In this context, a methodological dilemma arises between the authority of reason as the main interpretive instrument and the authority of revelation as a source of transcendent truth, which is problematic in the discourse of interpretation—both historically and contemporary. Using qualitative methods based on literature studies and content analysis of the interpretation text, this study found that al-Zamakhsharī emphasized the supremacy of reason in interpreting verses containing elements of anthropomorphism, and rejected literal interpretations that have the potential to equate God with creatures. This interpretation consistently prioritizes linguistic and logical approaches to maintain the purity of the concept of monotheism. This study contributes to understanding the epistemological construction of Mu'tazilah interpretation and opens up opportunities for the development of contemporary interpretation methodology that is rational-transcendental and contextual. |
Keywords
Full Text:
References
Abd Jabbar, al-Q. (1963). Sharah Usul al-Khamsah. al-Baby al-Halaby.
Abdul Halim, M. (2000). Manâhij Al-Mufassirîn. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Mishriyyah dan Dar Al-Kutub Al-Libani.
Abdullah, M. A. (2016). Divinity and Humanity in Islam and Christianity. Exchange, 45(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/1572543X-12341398
Abu Bakar As-Suyuthi, A. (1396). Thabaqât Al-Mufassirîn Al-Ísyrîn. Maktabah Wabah.
Adi, D. R. (2019). Ru’yatullah Perspektif Mu’tazilah Dan Ahl Al-Sunnah Wa Al-Jam Ā’ah(Studi Komparatif Tafsīr al-Kasshāf Karya al-Zamakhshary dan Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb Karya al-Rāzī). Studia Quranika, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v3i2.2691
Ahmad, J. (2024). Biografi Lengkap Imam Az-Zamakhsyari dan Tafsir Al-Kasysyaf. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/db7at
Aiman, U. (2016). Metode Penafsiran Wahbah Al-Zuhaylî: Kajian al-Tafsîr al-Munîr. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v36i1.106
Al Ja’far, M., & al-Sarhan, M. H. (1980). Manahij al-Mufassirin. Dar al-Ma’rifat.
al-Khalidi, S. A. al-Fattah. (2008). Ta’rif al-Darisin Bi Manahij al-Mufassirin. Dar al Qalam.
Al-Zamakhshari. (1968a). Al-kashshaf ’an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil wa ’Uyun al-Aqawil fi Wujub al-Ta’wil. Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.
Al-Zamakhshari. (1968b). Al-kashshaf ’an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil wa ’Uyun al-Aqawil fi Wujub al-Ta’wil. Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.
Al-Zamakhshari. (1998a). Al-kashshaf ’an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil wa ’Uyun al-Aqawil fi Wujub al-Ta’wil. Maktabah Al-Abikan.
Al-Zamakhshari. (1998b). Al-kashshaf ’an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil wa ’Uyun al-Aqawil fi Wujub al-Ta’wil. Maktabah Al-Abikan.
Andika, M. (2019). Reinterpretasi Ayat Gender dalam Memahami Relasi Laki-Laki dan Perempuan (Sebuah Kajian Kontekstual dalam Penafsiran). Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 17(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2018.172.137-152
Anwar, W. T. L., Handayani, I., & Miftahuljannah, V. (2024). Konsep Ketuhanan dan Akhlak dalam Menetapkan Sifat Tuhan. 01(02).
Asghar, A. E. (2013). Islam dan Pembebasan. LKiS.
Bagir, H. (2017). Islam Tuhan Islam Manusia. Mizan.
Chaeratunnisa, E., Sari, F., & Hidayat, S. (2024). Konsepsi Filsafat Idealisme Dalam Penerapan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Literasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2024.15(1).27-38
Dahlén, A. (2004). Islamic Law, Epistemology and Modernity: Legal Philosophy in Contemporary Iran (1st ed). Routledge.
Damayanti, W., Sutarto, S., Sari, D. P., & Nasution, A. R. (2024). Neurosains dalam Pemikiran Tokoh Al-Ghazali, Al-Farabi Dan Ibnu Sina. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 2(3), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.31004/ijim.v2i3.86
Darojat, M. H., Hamat, M. F., & Wan Ramli, W. A. (2017). Al-Bāqillāni’s Critique to Mu’tazilites on the Createdness of the Qur’an. International Journal of Quranic Research, 9(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol9no1.2
Fadel, M. (2008). The True, the Good and the Reasonable: The Theological and Ethical Roots of Public Reason in Islamic Law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 21(1), 5–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S084182090000432X
Ferdiansah. (2024). Nalar Islam Progresif Muhammad Amin abdullah. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Frolov, A. (2022). Bediuzzaman Said Nursī’s Critique of the Concept of Waḥdat al-Wujūd (The Unity of Being). Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 7(2), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.2979/ims.2022.a896986
Habermas, J., & Mendieta, E. (2002). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, God, and modernity. Polity.
Haromaini, A., & Ag, M. (2015). Metode Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.
Hasbiyallah, M. (2018). Paradigma Tafsir Kontekstual: Upaya Membumikan Nilai-Nilai Al-Qur’an. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v12i1.2924
Hazmin, Moh. M. & Mochammad Yahya Ghozali. (2023). Al-Zamakhsharī’s Rational Hermeneutics and Social Ethics: An Analytical Study of Tafsīr Al-Kashshāf. Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, 1(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.15642/juit.2023.1.2.249-270
Hidayat, M. (2024). Reconsidering Between Reason and Revelation in Islamic Legal Philosophy. Al-Risalah, 15(2), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v15i2.3764
Huda, M., Yusuf, J. B., Azmi Jasmi, K., & Nasir Zakaria, G. (2016). Al-Zarnūjī’s Concept of Knowledge (‘iIlmi). Sage Open, 6(3), 2158244016666885. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016666885
Husaini, H. (2022). Pemikiran Harun Nasution Tentang Pembaharuan Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Ikhtibar Nusantara, 1(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.62901/j-ikhsan.v1i1.81
Husna Maulida & Bashori. (2025). Kajian Kitab Tafsir Mafatih Al-Ghaib Karya Fakhruddin Al-Razi. AT-TAKLIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin, 2(1), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.71282/at-taklim.v2i1.48
Igisani, R. (2018). Kajian Tafsir Mufassir di Indonesia. Potret Pemikiran, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v22i1.757
Jamaluddin. (2015). Perkembangan Dan Pengaruh Pemikiran Teologi Mu‘Tazilah Tentang Kemakhlukan Al-Qur’ān Tahun 124-218 H/742-838 M. Thaqafiyya, Vol. 16, No. 1.
Jannah, S., & Rahman, Y. (2023). Theological Interpretation Of The Quran: An Analysis Of Muʿtazilah Thought In. 10.
Kania, D. D. (2014). Kajian Kritis Pemikiran Epistemologi Frithjof Schuon (1907–1998). TSAQAFAH, 10(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v10i1.65
Khan, D. D. T. (2017). Mu’tazilaism: An Introduction to Rationality in Islam. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), 4(10).
Kharlie, A. T. (2018). Metode Tafsir Muhammad Abduh dan Muhammad Rasyid Ridha dalam Tafsîr Al-Manâr. TAJDID, 25(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.36667/tajdid.v25i2.323
Lateh, N., Osman, M. R., & Rejab, S. N. M. (2018). Implication of the Determination for the Gold Ribawi ’Illah (Cause) Towards Fiat Money in Islam. Turkish Online Journal Of Design Art And Communication, 8(Sept), 1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.7456/1080SSE/167
Muḥammad ibn Jarīr., A.-Ṭabarī, Abū Ja‘far. (1405a). Jāmi‘ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Fikr.
Muḥammad ibn Jarīr., A.-Ṭabarī, Abū Ja‘far. (1405b). Jāmi‘ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Fikr.
Mulyaden, A., Hilmi, M. Z., & Yunus, B. M. (2022). Manhaj Tafsir Al-Kasyaf Karya Al-Zamakhsyari. Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas, 2(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i1.16492
Mutahhari, M. M. (1985). An Introduction to ’Ilm al-Kalam. Vol. II No. 2.
Nasution, H. (2006). Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran, Sejarah Analisa Dan Perbandingan. UI Press.
Nurhuda, A. (2024). Conceptions Of Reason And Revelation In Discourses Mu’tazilah, Asya’riyah, And Maturidiyah (Samarkhan And Bukhara). Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 132. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.19651
Pardosi, M. T., & Murtiningsih, S. (2019). Refleksi Konsep Ketuhanan Agama Kristen dan Agama Islam Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Perenial. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.16130
Pramana, M. S. A. (2024). Intertextual Analysis of Sufaha’ in Q.S. al-Baqarah [2]:13: A study of Wahbah az-Zuhaili and az-Zamakhshari’s Interpretation. Jalsah : The Journal of Al-Quran and As-Sunnah Studies, 4(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.37252/jqs.v4i2.972
Putri, D. F., Munawwaroh, I., & Qushwa, F. G. (2025). Kontekstualisasi Akal Dan Wahyu: Pemikiran Tafsir Mu’tazilah Dalam Peradaban Islam.
Rahmatulloh, M. S. L. (2020). Revitalisasi Nilai-Nilai Tauhid sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Muslim Progresif dalam Beragama dan Bernegara: Interpretasi dan Aplikasi QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 21-22 Perspektif Teori Hermeneutik Farid Esack. AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 7(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v7i2.1588
Rust, E. C. (1981). Religion, revelation & reason. Mercer University Press.
Saeed, A. (1999). Rethinking ‘Revelation’ as a Precondition for Reinterpreting the Qur’an: A Qur’anic Perspective. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 1(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.1999.1.1.93
Setiawan, M. A., & Asyiqien, M. Z. (2019). Urgensi Akal Menurut Al Qur’an Dan Implikasinya Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman, 9(01), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.33367/ji.v9i01.965
Shaleh, S. (1988). Mubakhis fii ’Ulumil Qur’an. Dar Ilmi.
Shamsul, M. N. (2024). The Concept of Knowledge Transmission in Ibn Taimiyah’s Thought: A Study of Revelation, Reason, and the Senses as Knowledge Channels in Islam. Islamic Studies in the World. https://doi.org/10.70177/islw.v1i2.1268
Sirait, A. A., & Nasution, U. N. (2023). Aliran Ilmu Kalam Sebagai Reformulasi Kualitas Iman Di Era. 8(2).
Subhi, A. M. (1985). Fi ‘Ilmi al-Kalam,. Dar al-Nahdhah al-A’rabiyah.
Sugianto, M., Hakim, L., & Jamal, K. (2022). Metode Tafsir Mu’tazilah Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Aqidah. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir, 5(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqon.v5i2.1394
Supardi, Kuswaya, A., & K. Ridwan, M. (2023). Wasathiyah Islam in Local Language Commentaries in Indonesia: An Analysis of Readers’ Reception of Sundanese, Javanese, And Malay. Millatī, Vol. 8, No. 1, June.
Supriyanto, S. (2022). Al-Ghazali’s Metaphysical Philosophy of Spiritualism In The Book Of Ihya ‘Ulumuddin. Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service, 3(5), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.36418/dev.v3i5.138
Surahman, C. (2014). Pergeserab Pemikiran Tafsir di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Bibli0grafis. Afkaruna, 10(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.18196/aiijis.2014.0039.217-232
Suryadi, R. A. (2022). Al-Qur’an Sebagai Sumber Pendidikan Islam. Taklim : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.17509/tk.v20i2.50336
Tampubolon, I. (2014). Orientasi Dan Corak Pembaruan Dalam Islam (Kajian Terhadap Respons Masyarakat Islam). 1.
Tariq, M. M. (2008). Ideological Background of Rationality in Islam. Volume 28.
Wahidah, L. M., & Harahap, W. R. (2022). Moderasi Beragama ala Mu’tazilah (Studi Q.S Al- Baqarah Ayat 143 dalam Tafsir Al-Manar).
Wasim, A. A. (2021). Pemikiran Linguistik Sibawaih (147-180 H) dan Urgensinya bagi Studi Islam. Matan : Journal of Islam and Muslim Society, 3(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.matan.2021.3.1.3589
Zubairin, A. (2020). Upaya Pembuktian Otentisitas Al-Qur`An. Melalui Pendekatan Sastra (Tafsir Adabiy). Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 21(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v21i1.97
10.33650/at-turas.v12i1.10986 |
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 alniatul fadilah, Muh. Fathoni Hasyim, Muhammad Harisul Islam, Hafidh Dinul Kholis
This journal is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License