Phonological Interference of the Indonesian Language on the Pronunciation of Arabic Hijaiyah Phonemes in the Early Stages of Quran Learning: Psycho-Phonological Analysis in Kindergarten Students

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v13i2.14970
Authors

(1)  Muhammad Nashi Huddin Ubaidillah   (Universitas Sumatera Utara)  
        Indonesia
(2) * Rafli Maulana Nst   (Universitas Sumatera Utara)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Khayyarah Alimah   (Universitas Sumatera Utara)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Nabila Ramadhan   (Universitas Sumatera Utara)  
        Indonesia
(5)  Nursukma Suri   (Universitas Sumatera Utara)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examines the phonological interference of Indonesian language on the pronunciation of Arabic hijaiyah phonemes in kindergarten children in Iqra learning. The purpose of the study is to identify forms of phonological interference and explain the psycho-phonological factors behind them. The approach used is descriptive qualitative with a psycho-phonological framework that operationalizes Chomsky's theory of mental representation, Weinreich's interference theory, and Lado's contrastive analysis as analytical instruments. Eight students from Ibnu Al-Akbar Lubuk Pakam Kindergarten who are taking Iqra volume 1 were selected through purposive sampling based on the criteria of native Indonesian speakers who have not received formal tajweed training. Data were collected through pronunciation tests, voice recordings, classroom observations, and phonological discrimination tests. The results showed that the Indonesian sound system significantly affected the production of Arabic phonemes in children, especially in emfatic consonants (tafkhim), throat sounds (pharynx and laryngeal), and uvular consonants that are not found in the Indonesian phonological system. Although the average score of the production test of 17.25 out of 20 indicates a fairly good basic ability, analysis of the sound discrimination test reveals that a number of pronunciation errors stem from the limitations of phonological perception, rather than mere articulation weaknesses. The error pattern was dominated by sound substitution (26 cases), followed by changes in sound properties (10 cases) and sound elimination (4 cases). These findings contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of second language phonological adaptation in early childhood, which in the framework of the Perceptual Assimilation Model (Best and Tyler, 2007) can be described as a perceptual assimilation process in which unfamiliar second language sounds are assimilated into the most similar categories of first language phonemes and form the basis of recommendations for Iqra learning strategies based on multisensory approaches and auditory discrimination training.



Keywords

phonological interference of the Indonesian language; Arabic phoneme hijaiyah; psycho-phonology; acquisition of phonology of second languages; literacy of the Qur'an in early life.



Full Text: PDF



References


Ahmadil, H., Zubaidillah, M. H., & Sulthan, M. A. (2025). Strategies to improve simple Arabic reading abilities for early childhood. Early Childhood International Journal, 1(1), 107-120.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bates, E., Thal, D., Finlay, B., & Clancy, B. (1994). Early language development and its neural correlates. In I. Rapin & S. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 7, pp. 69-110). Elsevier.

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O. S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 13-34). John Benjamins.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2005). Psycholinguistics: Understanding language acquisition. Indonesian Torch Library Foundation.

Esling, J. H. (1999). The IPA categories 'pharyngeal' and 'epiglottal': Laryngoscopic observations of pharyngeal articulations and a laryngeal model. Language and Speech, 42(4), 349-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420040

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277). York Press.

Gunarti, W. (2025). Applying contrastive linguistic approach to minimize interference of regional language sounds with Arabic. Medina: Journal of Islamic Studies, 21(1), 45-62.

Ibrahim, G. H. (1978). Tajweed al-Quran al-Karim. Dar al-Fikr.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831-843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.

Leather, J., & James, A. (1991). The acquisition of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(3), 305-341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010287

Marni, R., & Ahmi. (2025). Arabic learning strategy for early childhood in Raudhatul Athfal. Arabic as Foreign Language Journal (AFLJ), 5(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31869/aflj.v5i1.6671.

McCarthy, J. J. (1994). The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In P. Keating (Ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 191-233). Cambridge University Press.

Muslich, M. (2010). Indonesian phonology: A descriptive review of the Indonesian sound system. The Earth of Scripts.

Pangestika, R. (2023). Phonological study of Arabic-Indonesian absorption: Sound changes in lexical adaptation. Al-Irfani: Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 12(2), 88-105. 10.22363/2521-442X-2026-10-1-38-53.

Saepurrohman, A., & Solihat, Z. A. (2025). The interference of the Indonesian language in Arabic communication at modern Islamic boarding school. Al-Ta'rib: Journal of Arabic Education, 13(2), 461-478. https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v13i2.10750.

Shah, F. (2023). Phonological interference in religious discourse at Islamic boarding schools. UNS Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 33-51.

Solehudin, M., & Arisandi, Y. (2024). Language interference in Arabic learning: A case study of Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. Al-Ta'rib: Scientific Journal of the Arabic Language Education Study Program IAIN Palangka Raya, 12(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v12i2.9170.

Stephanie O'Neill, N. (2023). Differences in Arabic-Indonesian vocabulary absorption in religious terms. Arabiyyat: Journal of Arabic Language and Arabic Language Education, 6(1), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.58223/alirfan.v6i1.6797.

Supriyadi, T., & Julia, J. (2019). Phonological interference in reciting Al-Qur'an: A critical reflection on the learning of Al-Qur'an phonology through action research. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.5

Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Linguistic Circle of New York.

Zahra, D. N., & Amrulloh, M. A. (2020). Sundanese phonological interference into Arabic. Arabi: Journal of Arabic Studies, 5(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v5i1.201


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/at-turas.v13i2.14970


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nashi Huddin Ubaidillah, Rafli Maulana Nst, Khayyarah Alimah, Nabila Ramadhan, Nursukma Suri

This journal is licensed under a

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

P-ISSN: 2355-567X, E-ISSN: 2460-1063