THE RESTITUTION TRIANGLE STRATEGY IN ESTABLISHING A SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING PARADIGM BASED ON ACTIVE AWARENESS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v9i2.14613
Authors

(1) * Akhmad Ghasi Pathollah   (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Togo Ambarsari Bondowoso, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Asia Anis Sulalah   (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Togo Ambarsari Bondowoso, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Desi Susanti   (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Togo Ambarsari Bondowoso, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(4)  Hasan Jali   (Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysian Institute of Information Technology)  
        Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to develop a Restitution Triangle Strategy as an innovative approach in building a Self-Directed Learning (SDL) paradigm with a focus on increasing students' active awareness. The problem faced is the low level of active awareness among learners in the learning process, which results in their limited ability to learn independently and a lack of attention to emotional, cognitive, and social aspects in conventional learning. The research method used is a qualitative study with a model development approach through observation, interviews, and literature study. The results of the study show that the restitution triangle strategy is able to construct students' active awareness, which contributes to the achievement of a more sustainable SDL paradigm. The application of this strategy harmoniously integrate psychological and pedagogical aspects in learning, which supports student learning independence. In addition, this study also found that educators need training to apply this strategy effectively. The implementation of this strategy also shows an increase in student participation and emotional involvement in learning. The use of this approach demonstrates the importance of learning management that prioritizes acknowledgement, reflection, and compensation. The implication of this study is the importance of applying the Restitution Triangle strategy in developing an active awareness-based Self-Directed Learning paradigm, which can increase student engagement in the learning process and encourage the development of independent skills in facing educational challenges.


Keywords

Restitution Triangle Strategy, Self-Directed Learning







References


Abubakar, S., Noni, N., & Jabu, B. (2025). The Role of Restitution-Based Approach in Promoting Student Responsibility in English Classrooms. International Journal of Language, Education, and Literature, 2(4), 569–575.

Adigun, O. T., Mpofu, N., & Maphalala, M. C. (2025). Fostering self‐directed learning in blended learning environments: A constructivist perspective in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(1), e12572.

Anshu, Gupta, P., & Singh, T. (2022). The concept of self-directed learning: implications for practice in the undergraduate curriculum. Springer.

Ayuba, J. O., Abdullateef, L. E., Rozi, F., Rosi, F., & Nu’man, A. (2025). Assessing Information and Communication Technology Utilization in Teaching Islamic Studies in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 9(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v9i2.14493

Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, Sixth Edition.

Cukurova, M. (2025). The interplay of learning, analytics and artificial intelligence in education: A vision for hybrid intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 469–488.

Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023a). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia Cirp, 119, 84–90.

Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023b). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia Cirp, 119, 84–90.

Doo, M. Y., & Zhu, M. (2024). A meta‐analysis of effects of self‐directed learning in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 1–20.

Ginzburg, S. B., Santen, S. A., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2021). Self-directed learning: a new look at an old concept. Medical Science Educator, 31(1), 229–230.

Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Pan, X., & Zhao, W. (2022). Using the online self-directed learning environment to promote creativity performance for university students. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 130–147.

Joyner, K. J., Franck Love, S., Shah, R., Liu, N. H., & Brooks Stephens, J. R. (2025). Advancing Our Understanding of Cultural Competency Learning Requires More of a Structural Perspective than an Individual One. Psychological Inquiry, 36(3), 193–197.

Kim, J., Detrick, R., Yu, S., Song, Y., Bol, L., & Li, N. (2025). Socially shared regulation of learning and artificial intelligence: Opportunities to support socially shared regulation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 11483–11521.

Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: Effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 16.

Lejeune, C., Beausaert, S., & Raemdonck, I. (2023). Effective personal development plans contextualized: The role of the autonomy‐supportive people manager in sustaining employees’ self‐directed learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 34(4), 389–412.

Lê, J. K., & Schmid, T. (2022). The practice of innovating research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 308–336.

Li, B., Bonk, C. J., Wang, C., & Kou, X. (2024). Reconceptualizing self-directed learning in the era of generative AI: An exploratory analysis of language learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1489–1503.

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2005). Self‐managed learning groups in higher education: Students’ perceptions of process and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 373–390.

Morris, T. H. (2024). Four dimensions of self-directed learning: A fundamental meta-competence in a changing world. Adult Education Quarterly, 74(3), 236–254.

Morris, T. H., Bremner, N., & Sakata, N. (2025). Self-directed learning and student-centred learning: a conceptual comparison. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(3), 847–866.

Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self‐regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328–1353.

Palaniappan, K., & Noor, N. M. (2022). Gamification strategy to support self-directed learning in an online learning environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(3), 104–116.

Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564294.

Purike, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). A comparison of the effectiveness of digital and traditional learning in developing countries. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(2), 179–186.

Riswanti Rini, R., Mujiyati, M., Ismu, S., & Hasan, H. (2022). The effect of self-directed learning on students’ digital literacy levels in online learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 229–341.

She, H., Lin, H., & Huang, L. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 (PISA 2015) performance of students in Taiwan: The role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309–1340.

Song, B. K. (2021). E-portfolio implementation: Examining learners’ perception of usefulness, self-directed learning process and value of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 68–81.

Sukardi, A., Kholilurrohman, K., Hidayah, F., & Hussen, B. T. E. (2024). Enhacing Critical Thingking Through Problem Based Learning In Islamic Educaiton. Edureligia: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 8(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v8i2.9071

Thompson Burdine, J., Thorne, S., & Sandhu, G. (2021). Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 55(3), 336–343.

Vismaya, A., Gopi, A., Romate, J., & Rajkumar, E. (2024). Psychological interventions to promote self-forgiveness: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 258.

Wu, T.-T., Lee, H.-Y., Li, P.-H., Huang, C.-N., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Promoting self-regulation progress and knowledge construction in blended learning via ChatGPT-based learning aid. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 1539–1567.

Younas, M., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Jiang, Y. (2025). A comprehensive systematic review of AI-driven approaches to self-directed learning. IEEE Access.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/edureligia.v9i2.14613


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Akhmad Ghasi Pathollah, Asia Anis Sulalah, Desi Susanti, Hasan Jali

Creative Commons License
 

Edureligia : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam
Published by Lembaga Penerbitan, Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.