Modality Used in Indonesian Presidential Debate: A Corpus-Based Political Discourse Study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v7i2.11782

Authors (s)


(1) * Binti Aisiah Daning Sumari   (State University of Medan)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The language utilized by politicians during electoral debates encompasses linguistic strategies for persuading and influencing their target audiences. Broadcasted on Indonesian televisions in 2023-2024, the presidential candidates articulated their visions and presented persuasive arguments to win over votes. I observed that one of the language principles employed by the candidates in the recent electoral debate to convince prospective voters was linguistic modality. This research scrutinizes the type and function of modality used by these candidates. It is revealed that modality verbs which frequently emerged, such as ‘bisa’ (can), ‘akan’ (will), ‘harus’ (must), ‘ingin’ (want), ‘mungkin’ (may), and ‘mesti’ (should). After being transcribed, all data comprising a total of 40.239-word tokens or 8.982-word types were saved as plain text (.txt). AntConc 4.2.4 Software was used to import data and to automatically generate its frequency, concordance, collocation, and KWIC. The results indicate that epistemic modality is (48%), dynamic modalities (7.32%), intentional modality (11.4%), and deontic modalities (33.28%). The results obtained from this research may offer supplementary insights for discourse analysts and other linguists who have a similar interest in studying modality. This research suggests that politicians are more convincing if they use strong modalities in electoral debates. 

Keywords

Corpus linguistics, Modality, Political Discourse Analysis



Full Text: PDF



References


Alwi, Hasan. (1992). Modalitas Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Kanisius: Jakarta.

Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 3, No. 1: E30 Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/

Boussofara-Omar, Naima. (2006). Learning the “linguistic habitus” of a Politician: A Presidential Authoritative Voice in the Making. Journal of Language and Politics, 5(3), 325–358. https://doi:10.1075/jlp.5.3.04bou

Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. Interpreting modality markers in political speeches. In: I-Mean. Conference Proceedings. First International Conference on Meaning in Interaction University of the West of England, Bristol, 23-25 April, 2009. 1st ed. Bristol, 2010.

Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman

Fenton-Smith B (2007) Diplomatic condolences: Ideological positioning in the death of Yasser

Arafat. Discourse & Society 18(6): 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507082192

Fowler, R. (1985). Power. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 4. Discourse analysis in society (pp. 61-82). London: Academic Press.

Gruber, Helmut. (2015). Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17(6): 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602377

Hanauer, David. I. (2011). The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 10(3): 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han

Jones W (2014) Political semiotics of national campaign posters and pictorial representation: Thailand’s 2011 general elections. Semiotica 199: 269–296. https://doi:10.1515/sem-2013-0128

Kenzhekanova, Kuralay Kenzhekankyzy.(2015). Linguistic Features of Political Discourse. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. Vol 6 No 6 S2 November 2015. https://doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p192

Kreis R (2017) The ‘Tweet politics’ of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4):

–618. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre

Li, Jian., Cheng, L., & Cheng, W. (2016). Deontic meaning-making in legislative discourse. Semiotica, 2016(209). https://doi:10.1515/sem-2016-0002

Lillian, Donna L (2008). Modality, Persuasion, and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines Journal. Vol 2 (1): 1-6

Lyons, J (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mcenery, Tony & Andrew Hardie (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom

McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction 2nd Edition. Routledge

Musolff A (2017) Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 109: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.010

Palmer F R. (2001). Mood and Modality. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press

Palmer, F. R. 2003. Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug and F. Palmer, eds., Modality in Contemporary English, 1-17. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Perkins, M. (1983). Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter

Perrez J, Reuchamps M (eds) (2012) Les relations communautaires en Belgique: Approches politiques et linguistiques [The community relations in Belgium: Political and linguistic approaches]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan.

Perrez J, Reuchamps M (2015) A crazy machine or a strong ‘living apart together’ relationship? The role of metaphors in citizens’ perception of Belgian federalism. Mots. Les langages du politique 109: 125–145. https://doi.org/10.4000/mots.22171

Randour, F., Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2020). Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse and Society, 31(4), 428-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903526

Rescher, N. (1968) Topics in philosophical logic. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Romadhlani, M.Masqotul Imam & Tofan Dwi Hardjanto (2024). Epistemic modality in American presidential discourse. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, Vol 8 Issue 1 (June 2024) p.41-50.

Taylor, Janie. (2018). Modality Makes Headlines: How political Newspapers talk about climate change. University of Memphis

Van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). Political Discourse and Political Cognition. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, pp 155-184. https://doi:10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3_7

Vukovic, M. (2014). Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics, 1(1). doi:10.2478/opli-2014-0003

Von Wright, Georg H. (1954) "An Essay in Modal Logic". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5(18):166-167

Wodak R and Boukala S. (2015). European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union. Journal of Language and Politics 14(1): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijoeel.v7i2.11782


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Binti Aisiah Daning Sumari