Providing Students an Aural Learning Modality With Written Grammar Feedback for Their Writing

Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v3i2.6672



Abstract

The study successfully investigates how students' writing abilities are affected by feedback on written grammar that is specifically customized to their auditory learning preferences. It was designed to find a better method for enhancing auditory learners' writing skills. The results show that tailored grammatical feedback that takes into account auditory learning preferences produces better results in improving writing abilities than traditional input. When given individualized feedback, auditory learners improved their writing skills more. The study highlights the value of teaching approaches that take into account students' chosen styles of learning, especially when it comes to developing writing abilities. It advises using tactics that are in line with learners' preferences into educational design. The study opens the door for future research into alternate ways that make use of adaptable methods and educational technology to improve student learning. Longitudinal studies can also shed light on the long-term effects of tailored learning strategies that are in line with student preferences. In parallel, the larger educational community studies how various learning styles and pedagogies interact. By continuously enhancing curricula and teaching methods, this study helps to maximize achievement in a variety of educational environments. Overall, this study offers implications for enhancing educational procedures and encouraging top-notch student achievement


Full Text:

PDF

References

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its

impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational

Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24.

García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2020). Translanguaging and literacies. Reading research

quarterly, 55(4), 553-571.

Grigoryan, A. (2017). Audiovisual commentary as a way to reduce transactional distance and

increase teaching presence in online writing instruction: Student perceptions and

preferences. Journal of Response to Writing, 3(1), 5.

Igwenagu, C. (2016). Fundamentals of research methodology and data collection. LAP

Lambert Academic Publishing.

Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2022). Developing a learning analytics intervention in e-learning to

enhance students’ learning performance: A case study. Education and Information

Technologies, 27(5), 7099-7134.

Mourssi, A. (2013). Theoretical and practical linguistic shifting from product/guided writing

to process writing and recently to the innovated writing process approach in teaching

writing for second/foreign language learners. International Journal of Academic

Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 731.

Rahayu, D. C., Suryani, S., & Zainiyati, H. S. (2020). Identification of vacuum learning styles

(visual, auditory, kinesthetic) primary school students in Indonesia. International

Journal of Education and Research, 8(9), 181-190.

Rusmiyanto, R., Huriati, N., Fitriani, N., Tyas, N. K., Rofi’i, A., & Sari, M. N. (2023). The

Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Developing English Language Learner's

Communication Skills. Journal on Education, 6(1), 750-757.

SK, M. S., & Helena, M. T. C. (2017). Styles of Learning Based on the Research of Fernald,

Keller, Orton, Gillingham, Stillman, Montessori and Neil D Fleming. International

Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(4), 17-25.

Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the

learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3),

-286.

Suryanto, B. T. (2018). WRITTEN GRAMMAR FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’WRITING WITH VISUAL LEARNING STYLE. PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 1-18.

Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015).

Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a

blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127-135


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijoeel.v3i2.6672


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto