The Persuasive Role of Meta-Discourse Markers in Digital Advertising

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v5i2.6902

Authors (s)


(1) * Sri Widyarti Ali   (Gorontalo State University)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Nurlaila Husain   (Universitas Negeri Gorontalo)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigates the persuasive use of interactive and interactional meta-discourse markers in digital advertising, employing Hyland's (2005) model. Interactive meta-discourse encompasses transition markers, frame markers, endophoric markers, evidential, and code glosses, while interactional meta-discourse includes hedges, boosters, attitude markers, self-mentions, and engagement markers. The process of data collection includes extracting data from websites with digital advertisements, analyzing the use of meta-discourse markers in these ads to understand their context and purpose, and categorizing these markers into interactive and interactional categories. Data analysis involves identifying and examining the presence of these markers in digital advertising, interpreting how they contribute to persuasion in the text, and presenting the findings by categorizing interactive and interactional meta-discourse markers while explaining their persuasive significance. The research reveals that in advertisements for beauty products and luxury cars, transition markers are the sole category of interactive meta-discourse used. In contrast, interactional meta-discourse exhibits a broader range of categories in advertising, encompassing attitude markers, self-mention, engagement markers, and boosters. 



Keywords

Interactive, Interactional, Meta-discourse, Persuasive, Digital Advertising



Full Text: PDF



References


Frolova, S. (2014). The Role Of Advertising In Promoting A Product Thesis Centria University Of Applied Sciences. Degree Programme in Industrial Management. May.

Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Velasco-Sacristán, M., Arribas-Baño, A., & Samaniego-Fernández, E. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interaction in Academic Writing. Longman.

Hyland, K. (2005). Meta-discourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hyland, K. (2010). Meta-discourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220

Lai, X. (2023). A Study of Interactional Metadiscourse and Its Persuasive Function in Advertising Discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 79–84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370038331_A_Study_of_Interactional_Metadiscourse_and_Its_Persuasive_Function_in_Advertising_Discourse.

Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Using Meta-discourse to Enhance Persuasiveness in Corporate Press Releases: A Corpus-Based Study. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032165

Shahab, S., & Assadi, N. (2014). The Pragmatic Role Of Meta-Discourse Markers In The Attainment Of Persuasion: A Study Of An Iranian Newspaper Advertisement Headlines. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 4(1), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v4i1.5208

Taghizadeh, M., & Tajabadi, F. (2013). Meta-discourse in Essay Writing: An EFL Case. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(7), 1658–1662. www.irjabs.com

Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman and Hall. CRC, London.


Article View

Abstract views : 101 times | PDF files viewed : 112 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijoeel.v5i2.6902


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Widyarti Ali, Nurlaila Husain