REORIENTING SCIENTIFIC EXEGESIS: A LAKATOSIAN ANALYSIS OF THE QUR’AN-SCIENCE RELATIONSHIP IN THE INDONESIAN MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS’ SCIENTIFIC EXEGESIS

Abstract

This study examines the tafsīr ilmī (scientific exegesis) issued by the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs as a contemporary model for relating the Qur’an and science, a project that articulates explicit interpretive principles meant to mediate between the integrity of revelation and the provisional nature of scientific knowledge. This study aims to assess the consistency between the foundational principles and interpretive practice of Tafsīr Ilmī, and to evaluate the epistemological implications of this structure for the relationship it constructs between the Qur’an and science. The analysis draws on three thematic volumes, on the creation of humankind (Penciptaan Manusia), the creation of the Earth (Penciptaan Bumi), and the extinction of living beings (Kepunahan Makhluk Hidup).  The data are read through content analysis, drawing analogically on Imre Lakatos’s account of research programmes, in which the foundational principles form a hard core safeguarded by methodological heuristics and the thematic interpretations constitute the protective belt those heuristics produce, so as to test how far practice remains consistent with principle. The study finds that Tafsīr Ilmī guards the meaning of the Qur’an effectively against scientific reductionism, yet its interpretation remains largely explanatory and confirmatory, leaving the Qur’an’s capacity to raise new scientific questions unactivated. On this basis the article proposes reorienting Tafsīr Ilmī to affirm the Qur’an as a source of research inspiration, so that scientific interpretation may become a more productive, two-directional exchange between revelation and science.