Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope Jurnal Hakam

1. Focus

Fokus penelitian dalam jurnal hakam meliputi kajian-kajian hukum dan keislaman.

2. Scope

Adapun jangkauan (scope) penelitian dalam jurnal hakam terkait dengan hukum pidana, jinayah, hukum perdata, hukum keluarga islam, studi perbandingan hukum dan madzhab, sosiologi hukum islam, dan filsafat hukum islam. Penulis dalam jurnal hakam diperbolehkan dari berbagai kalangan masyarakat, baik akademisi (seperti guru dan dosen), tokoh masyarakat, tokoh agama, birokrat, praktisi hukum maupun politisi.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Focus and Scope

Hakam is published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, with its main aim to spread critical and original analysis from researchers and academic practitioners on various contemporary law, Sociology of Islamic Law, Philosophy of Islamic Law, Islamic Law Issues. We invite a researchers and academic practitioners on various contemporary islamic law issues to submit their critical writings and to contribute to the development of islamic law and will be published two time a year, in Juny and December. 

Hakam is a peer-reviewed scientific open access, with e-ISSN: 2580-8052 published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University.

 

Section Policies

ARTICLES

Checked Open SubmissionsChecked IndexedChecked Peer Reviewed

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

 

Peer Review Process

Hakam reviewing policies are:

  1. Every submitted paper will be reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers.
  2. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (Blind Peer Reviews).
  3. Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references.

The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully between 1 - 2 months. Please notice that may be paper submissions to Hakam, the duration of the review process can be up to  3 months.

Using Blind Peer Reviews

 

Publication Ethic

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Publication Frequency

Publishing twice a year in  Juny and December

 

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Online Submission

Already have a Username/Password for Hakam?
GO TO LOGIN

Need a Username/Password?
GO TO REGISTRATION

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

 

Plagiarism

All work in the manuscript should be free of any plagiarism, falsification, fabrications, or omission of significant material.
Authors are expected to explicitly cite others' work and ideas, even if the work or ideas are not quoted verbatim or paraphrased. This standard applies whether the previous work is published, unpublished, or electronically available. Failure to properly cite the work of others may constitute plagiarism. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Before Article is accepted, Plagiarism checker aplication is used.

 

Article Processing Charge (APCS)

Article Processing Charges is free, IDR.0.00. allows people to access the full text versions of the articles.

 

 

Article Submission Charge (ASCS)

Article Submission Charges in Hakam is Free, IDR.0.00. The submission includes submitting, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving.

 

Copyright Notice

 

All works are licensed under CC BY-SA

 

Author Guideliness

AURTHOR GUIDELINESS

 

Writing Article Guidance for Hakam 

Writing Article for Hakam is published twice a year, every Juny and December, containing papers/articles about the ideas and the research written by experts, educator, scientist, practitioners, and reviewers in the islamic law, sociology of islamic law, and philosopy of islamic law

General requirements:

  1. The length of the article is between 3000 to 4000 words (including bibliography, notes, and tables).
  2. Attach a statement that the article has not been published yet in any other publication and in any forms.
  3. Each article will be given test of plagiarism.
  4. The article consists of 9 components:

TITLE: USE CAPITAL LETTER, BLACK, LEFT INDENT, BOLD

The sections in the article does not use chapters (except for the research result and the discussion), but the indicators that the components or sections in the article stated can be seen at the first sentence in the first paragraph.

  1. The article is delivered using the following components:

Title: Maximum 12 words for article in Bahasa Indonesia or English. The font used is Times New Roman, 12, and bold.

The writer’s name: The writer’s name is written under the title using font Times New Roman, 10, bold, without titles, and cannot be shortened. Under the name of the writer it is written the areas of expertise, institution name, and the email address of the writer.

Abstract: no more than 250 words, written in both English and Bahasa Indonesia in one paragraph containing: The research objectives, research methodology, data analysis, and research findings. It is typed using font Times New Roman, single space.

Keyword: Maximum 4 words, separated with comma, typed using double space under the abstract. [font Times New Roman, 11, single space, italic]

Introduction: The introduction is written using capital letters [font Times New Roman, 12, bold] containing the background with a problem solving , the urgency and rationalization of activities, bibliography, solution plan, the objective of the activity, and hypothesis development. [font Times New Roman, 11, Normal]

Methodology: Research methodology explains about: the approach, scope or object, operational definition in each variable/description of research focus, place, population and sample/informant, main source and tool, technique of data collection, and technique of data analysis. [font Times New Roman, 11, Normal]

Findings and Discussion: The findings is presented in full and related with the scope of the research determined before. The findings can be completed with tables, graphs, and/or charts. The tables and pictures are given number and title. The result of data analysis is explained correctly in the article. The discussion part logically explains the findings, associated with the relevant sources. [Times New Roman, 11, Normal]

Conclusion and Suggestion: The conclusion contains the short summary of the findings and discussion. Conclusion is the findings in the research that has the answers for the research questions or the objective of the research. The research findings give suggestions or contributions to the application and/or the study development. [Times New Roman, 11, Normal]

References: containing referenced sources with minimum 80% of books last 10 years issue. The references is written based on American Psychological Association (APA)

  1. The article is written in Microsoft Office Word using font Times New Roman, 11, single space, A4 paper. The margin is 3-3-2-2 (left-top-right-bottom).
  2. Each published article will give charge to the writer for publishing the article.
  3. The writer can send and register the article via Online in the website: http://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/hakam/index