RECONSTRUCTION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY ALGORITHM FROM KHITAB WAD’I TO KHITAB TAKLIF: A PERSPECTIVE FROM JASSER AUDA’S SYSTEM THEORY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v10i2.14668
Authors

(1)  Doni Ekasaputra   (Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Tutik Hamidah   (Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang)  
        Indonesia
(3) * Slamet Slamet   (Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article examines the reconstruction of digital economic algorithms from the category of khitab wad’i to khitab taklif through the perspective of Jasser Auda’s systems theory. The rapid expansion of digital transactions has transformed algorithms from merely technical instruments into automated decision-making systems that influence contracts, pricing, recommendations, credit scoring, and user access to economic services. This development raises a fundamental question in Islamic economic law: whether algorithms should remain understood as passive legal means or be positioned as functional extensions of human action. This study employs normative legal research with conceptual, philosophical, and maqasidi approaches. The data are derived from classical usul al-fiqh literature, Jasser Auda’s systems theory, and contemporary studies on algorithmic governance in the digital economy. The findings show that classical usul al-fiqh tends to position algorithms as wasilah or sabab, while systems theory enables a more holistic reading by connecting human intention, technological design, automated action, legal consequence, and maqasid. This article argues that algorithms in the digital economy may be reconstructed as part of fi’l al-mukallaf because their operation reflects human intention, design, and responsibility. This reconstruction contributes to the development of Islamic digital economic law by strengthening legal accountability, ethical responsibility, and maqasid-based governance in automated transactions.





Full Text: PDF



References


al-Ḥanbalī, M. bin S. bin ‘Abdah al-S. al-R. (1415). Maṭālib Ulī Al-Nuhā Fī Syarḥ Ghāyat al-Muntahā, IV, 2nd ed. al-Maktab al-Islāmī.

al-Hindī, Ṣafī ad-Dīn Muḥammad bin ‘Abd ar-Raḥīm al-Urmawī. (1416). Nihāyat Al-Wuṣūl Fī Dirāyat al-Uṣūl, Vol. VIII: VIII. al-Maktabah at-Tijārīyah.

Ali, H. (2025). A Proposed Mathematical Model to Assess the Potential Impact of Generative AI Adoption in Islamic Financial Institutions. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 8(1), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.v8i1.24491

al-Iftā, W. al-B. al-’Ilmī bi I. (1439). ‘ Al-Tas’hīl Fī al-Fiqh ‘alā Madzhab al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal, II. Idārat al-Iftā’, Ministry of Endowments and Islamic Affairs.

Al-Minawi, A. al-M. M. bin M. bin M. bin ‘Abd al-L. (2011). The Comprehensive Commentary on the Abridgment of the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. al-Maktabah al-Syamilah.

al-Minīyāwī, A. al-M. M. bin M. bin M. bin ‘Abd al-L. (1432). Asy-Syarḥ al-Kabīr Li Mukhtaṣar al-Uṣūl Min ‘Ilm al-Uṣūl. al-Maktabah asy-Syāmilah.

al-Nawawī, A. Z. M. bin S. (1344). Al-Majmū’ Syarḥ al-Muhadzdzab, IX. Idārat al-Ṭibā’ah al-Manīriyyah.

al-Subkī, ʿAlī bin ʿAbd al-Kāfī, & al-Subkī, T. al-D. ʿAbd al-W. bin ʿAlī. (1424). Al-Ibhāj Fī Syarḥ al-Minhāj, III. Dār al-Buḥūṯ li al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah wa Iḥyāʾ al-Turāṯ.

al-Zuhaili, M. M. (2006). Al-Wajīz Fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. al-Madkhal – al-Maṣādir – al-Ḥukm al-Syar’ī), I, 2nd ed. (Dār al-Khair li al-Ṭibā’ah wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzī’.

ar-Ramlī, S. ad-D. A. al-’Abbās A. bin A. bin Ḥamzah. (1430). Fatḥ Ar-Raḥmān Bi Syarḥ Zubad Ibn Ruslān. Dār al-Minhāj.

Audah, J. (2012). Maqasid al-Sharī’ah: A Philosophy of Islamic Legislation; A Systematic Approach. Al-Tauzi’ Press in the Arab World.

Azevedo, É. S. F. (2023). Algorithmic Management on Digital Labor Platforms: A Systematic Literature Review. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão 21, e83099. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2023.83099

az-Zubaidi, B. bin Z. bin M. (1435). Al-Ijtihād Fī Manāṭ al-Ḥukm Asy-Syar’ī: Dirāsah Taʾṣīliyyah Taṭbīqiyyah. Markaz Takwīn li ad-Dirāsāt wa al-Abḥāts.

Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI. Philosophy and Technology, 36(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x

Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2021). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3848388

Gomes, P. (2022). Applied Sciences: Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Business Processes :

Hanspach, P. (2024). Algorithms in the Marketplace: An Empirical Analysis of Automated Pricing in e-Commerce. Information Economics and Policy, 69(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101111

Hutapea, N. M. S., Sitepu, D. K. C., Damanik, J., & Sianipar, S. K. L. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability: A Preliminary Study within the Indonesian Legal System. JIHK, 7(2), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.330

Kurniawan, A. A. (2022). Mediasi Sebagai Solusi Alternatif Konflik Keluarga Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Progresif. Al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 11(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.v11i2.825

Muḥammad, Z. bin I. bin. (n.d.). Al-Baḥr al-Rāiq Syarḥ Kanz al-Daqāiq, V, 2nd ed. Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī.

Óskarsdóttir, M., Bravo, C., Sarraute, C., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2019). The value of big data for credit scoring: Enhancing financial inclusion using mobile phone data and social network analytics. Applied Soft Computing, 74, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.004

Palop, A. B. (2020). Algorithms as Regulations: Considering Algorithms, When Used by the Public Administration for Decision-Making, as Legal Norms in Order to Guarantee the Proper Adoption of Administrative Decisions. European Review of Digital Administration & Law, 1(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255389608

Qudāmah, A. M. ‘Abdullāh bin A. bin M. bin. (1388). Al-Mughnī, IX. Maktabat al-Qāhirah.

Rilinger, G. (2024). Algorithmic Management and the Social Order of Digital Markets. Theory and Society, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09555-6

Rosidin, & El-Muním, A. A. (2008). Grounding Islamic Law Through Maqasid al-Shari’ah. A Translation) (PT Mizan Pustaka.

Stinson, C. (2022). Algorithms are not neutral. AI and Ethics, 2(4), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00136-w

Usman, M. I. (2022). Sharia Financial Institutions Compliance Towards Islamic Principles in Performing Intermediation Functions. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v14i1.25632

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390

Xu, Z. (2025). Credit Scoring Using Alternative Data Sources: A Machine Learning Approach. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 8(4), 56–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2025.080407

Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation and Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/jhi.v10i2.14668


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Doni Ekasaputra, Tutik Hamidah, Yunifa Miftachul Arif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.