Error Analysis on Students’ Writing in Using Simple Present Tense in Descriptive Text

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v3i2.3119

Authors (s)


(1) * Maulidatul Mukarromah   (Nurul Jadid University, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto   (Nurul Jadid University, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The objectives of this study are to know the types of errors and the dominant error made by the students of the ten grade of SMA Istiqlal. The researcher used the descriptive qualitative method as the research methodology. The data was collected from the written test done by the researcher. Based on the analysis that has done by the researcher, the result of the study found that all of the students produce error by total error 92 errors which classified into omission 46 error (50%),  5 error in addition (5,43%),  33 errors in miss-formation (35,86%) and 8 error in miss-ordering (8,69%). Thus, the dominant error was happened in the omission error by total error 46 errors (50%). The source of the error that made by the students are from interlingal and intra-lingual. However most of the errors are from the inralingual source which total 84 errors and 8 errors from inter-lingual.




Full Text: PDF



References


Alsagoff, L. (2009). A visual grammar of English. Pearson Education Asia.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press, USA.

Cowper, E. (1998). The simple present tense in English: a unified treatment. Studia Linguistica, 52(1), 1–18.

De Haan, F. (2011). Typology of tense, aspect, and modality systems. na.

Ellis, R. (1989). Understanding second language acquisition (Vol. 31). Oxford university press Oxford.

Harris, K. R., Ray, A., Graham, S., & Houston, J. (2019). Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th Grade students experiencing writing difficulties. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1459–1482.

Irawati, H. (2015). Error Analysis On Grammatical Aspects Of Student’s Narrative Writing. Getsempena English Education Journal, 2(1), 1–14.

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. unsw Press.

Leo, S. (2021). A challenging Book to practice Teaching in English. Penerbit Andi.

Londoño Vásquez, D. A. (2008). Error analysis in a written composition. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 10, 135–146.

Sargeant, H. (2007). Basic English Grammar: For English Language Learners. Saddleback.

Sipayung, K. T., Tampubolon, S., Napitupulu, F. D., & Tobing, F. L. (2021). Generic structure of descriptive text written English language learner and teachers. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1636–1650.

Suryanto, B. T. (2018). WRITTEN GRAMMAR FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’WRITING WITH VISUAL LEARNING STYLE. PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–18.

Ushchapovska, I. (2020). Multimodal features of descriptive texts: case study of coffee brands. World Science, 3(1 (53)), 23–26.

Willis, J. (2021). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books Ltd.


Article View

Abstract views : 454 times | PDF files viewed : 380 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/ijoeel.v3i2.3119


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Maulidatul Mukarromah, Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto