PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL JUCAMA TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN EFIKASI DIRI PADA MATERI PECAHAN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v3i2.868

Authors (s)


(1) * kuncahyono Kuncahyono   (Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Erna yayuk   (Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to examine the effect of the JUCAMA model on the learning outcomes of fifth grade elementary school students in fractional material and self-efficacy in fractions. The sample selection was chosen randomly as the experimental group and the control group. Data collection techniques for each group were given Reflection Symmetry Achievement Test (RSAT), and Fraction Self-Efficacy Scale (FSES) as pre-test and post-test. Covariance analysis was carried out to answer the research findings. In addition, five participants were interviewed to examine the source of self-efficacy which was a determinant of changes in the level of self-efficacy. The findings revealed that the JUCAMA model had a significant positive effect on student achievement in reflection and self-efficacy on fractional material.


Keywords

Self-Efficacy, Jucama Model, Fraction, Achievement



Full Text: PDF



References


Artigue M, Blomhøj M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM. ;45(6):797–810.

Bilican S, Demirtaşlı RN, Kilmen S. (2011). Matematik dersine ilişkin türk öğrencilerin tutum ve görüşleri: TIMSS 1999 ve TIMSS 2007 karşılaştırması. Kur Uyg Eğt Bil;11(3):1277–1283.

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE.(2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. 6th ed Boston: McGraw Hill.

Hammouri HA.(2003). An investigation of undergraduates’ transformational problem solving strate- gies: cognitive/metacognitive processes as predictors of holistic/analytic strategies. Assess Eval Higher Educ.;28(6):571–586.

Lappin G. (1995). How should mathematics be taught? Prospects for school mathematics. Math Teach.;4:38–45.

Mullis IV, Martin MO, Ruddock GJ, et al. (2012). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

National Research Council [NRC].(2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.

Özdilek Z, Bulunuz N. (2009). The effect of a guided inquiry method on pre-service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs. J Turk Sciduc.;6(2):24–42.

Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: (2001). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for win- dows (versions 10 and 11): SPSS student version 11.0 for windows. Milton Keynes (MK): Open University Press.

Schunk DH.(2011). Learning theories: an educational perspective. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc;

Taylor J, Bilbrey J. (2012). Effectiveness of inquiry-based and teacher-directed instruction in anAlabama elementary school. J Instr Pedagog.;8:1–7.


Article View

Abstract views : 63 times | PDF files viewed : 43 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/edureligia.v3i2.868


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 kuncahyono Kuncahyono, Erna yayuk

Creative Commons License
 

Edureligia : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam
Published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.