INSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTIVENESS; THE ROLE OF UNIQUE SELLING PROPOSITIONS IN EDUCATIONAL MARKETING

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v11i1.8673
Authors

(1) * Feriska Listrianti   (Nurul Jadid University, East Java)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study explores the important aspects of the uniqueness of educational institutions through the concept of Unique Selling Propositions (USP) in the context of effective marketing. Using a qualitative approach, this study aims to explore how a well-defined USP can serve as a differentiation tool for educational institutions and influence the decisions taken by prospective students and parents. The data collection process was carried out through in-depth interviews with various stakeholders, including educators and parents, and analysis of marketing documents implemented by the institution. The study's results revealed that a clear USP not only enhances the institution's image but also significantly contributes to increased enrollment and student loyalty. The emphasis on aspects such as innovation in the curriculum, an inclusive learning environment, and a track record of successful graduates has been shown to positively impact attracting a wider audience. This study presents a new perspective on the significance of USP in educational marketing strategies. It underlines the need for ongoing evaluation to ensure that the strategy remains relevant and effective in the face of the dynamics of the ever-changing educational market needs.



Keywords

Uniqueness of Institutions; Unique Selling Propositions; Education Marketing.



Full Text: PDF



References


Andina-Díaz, E. (2020). Using photovoice to stimulate critical thinking: An exploratory study with nursing students. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 28, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3625.3314

Bathmaker, A. M., & Orr, K. (2020). Epilogue: the elusive pursuit of distinctiveness and equity through higher vocational education. International Journal of Training Research, 18(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1905045

Bittner, M., McNamara, S., Silliman-French, L., & Katz, H. (2020). School administrators' opinions of adapted physical education services. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 33(1), 36–44. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084062389&origin=inward

Caldieraro, F., & Cunha, M. (2022). Consumers' response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.11.003

Dabi, G. K., & Golga, D. N. (2024). Availability, awareness, and utilization of assistive technologies among students with visual impairment: The case of Haramaya University, Ethiopia. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221124420

Davis, K.D., Aghaeepour, N., Ahn, A.H., Angst, M.S., Borsook, D., Brenton, A., Burczynski, M.E., Crean, C., Edwards, R., Gaudilliere, B., Hergenroeder, G.W., Iadarola, M.J., Iyengar, S., Jiang, Y., Kong, J.T., Mackey, S., Saab, CY, Sang, C.N., Scholz, J., … Pelleymounter, M.A. (2020). Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapies: challenges and opportunities. Nature Reviews Neurology, 16(7), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-0362-2

Dowling, M., Robertson, J., Washington, M., Leopkey, B., Ellis, D. L., Riches, A., & Smith, L. (2023). “Like Ships in the Night” and the Paradox of Distinctiveness for Sport Management: A Citation Network Analysis of Institutional Theory in Sport. Journal of Sport Management, 37(6), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0280

Fahrurrazi, F. (2024). Improving Elementary School Students' Learning Motivation Through Interactive Learning Methods. 2(3), 101–110.

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 international report. In Preparing for Life in a Digital World: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5

George-Reyes, C.E., Peláez-Sánchez, I.C., & Glasserman-Morales, L.D. (2024). Digital Environments of Education 4.0 and complex thinking: Communicative Literacy to close the digital gender gap. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2024(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.833

González‐pérez, L.I., & Ramírez‐montoya, M.S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Hafni, RN, Herman, T., Nurlaelah, E., & Mustikasari, L. (2020). The importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education to enhance students' critical thinking skills in facing the industry 4.0. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042040

Harvey, H., Ashworth, M., Palikara, O., & Van Herwegen, J. (2020). The Underreporting of Vision Problems in Statutory Documents of Children with Williams Syndrome and Down Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(12), 4553–4556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04520-5

Klausmann, J., & Papula, J. (2024). The Unique Selling Propositions of Small and Medium Enterprises and Their Influence on the Level of Covid 19 Impact on These SMEs. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol. 213, pp. 15–27). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62213-7_2

Konovalova, V.G., & Mitrofanova, A.E. (2021). Social and Ethical Problems of Digital Technologies Application in Human Resource Management. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 133, pp. 735–742). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47458-4_85

Lokarieva, H., & Chorna, H. (2022). Transformation of Value Orientations of Higher Education Applicants in Ukraine. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n3p95

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

McDermid, J. (2020). Gender, National Identity, and Education: Perceptions of Distinctiveness of the Scottish System of Education Between 1872 and 1918. In Springer International Handbooks of Education: Vol. Part F1619 (pp. 243–258). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2362-0_16

Monalisa, M. (2023). The Influence of Game Based Learning on Informatics Subjects in the Independent Curriculum on Motivation and Learning Achievement. Padma Sari: Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(01), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.53977/ps.v3i01.908

Noor Z. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research methodology. In Elvinaro Ardianto (Ed.), Deepublish (2nd ed.). Rosdakarya Youth.

Norris, T. (2021). What Is Educational about Education? The Distinctiveness of Education. Educational Theory, 71(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12471

Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students' creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z

Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2020). The influence of education on health: An empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995-2015. Archives of Public Health, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5

Rajas, M., Alves, P., & Muñiz, C. (2022). Creation and Dissemination of Audiovisual and Multimedia Content: Educational and Scientific Transformation in Progress. Index.Communication, 12(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/12/02Creaci

Rine, P.J., Brown, J.T., & Hunter, J.M. (2021). How Institutional Identity Shapes College Student Recruitment: The Relationship Between Religious Distinctiveness and Market Demand. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(1), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12375

Skills, A., Children, M., & Göle, M. O. (2024). The Effect of Digital Game-Based and Different Education Programs Quality preschool education affects children's school success in primary school and further education levels. The most important factors influencing literacy success in primary school are . 17(January), 202–235.

Qualitative Research Methodology.

Su, J., Gao, X., & Tan, J. (2024). Positioning for optimal distinctiveness: How firms manage competitive and institutional pressures under dynamic and complex environments. Strategic Management Journal, 45(2), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3549

Sutisna, F., & Tessa H. (2023). Optimizing Product Promotion Communication Strategy through Digital Asset Management. MENTARI Journal: Management, Education and Information Technology, 2(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.33050/mentari.v2i1.348

Syifa, AM, Musyahda, L., & Segoh, D. (2024). Systematic literature review: DOGBL in enhancing EFL students' motivation. 18(2), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21156

Taylor, M.A., & Teo, T.K. (2022). Sector Distinctiveness v. Cross-Sector Commonalities Are There Qualitative Differences in Graduate Nonprofit Management Education Offered Through Public Service and Business Programs in the United Kingdom? Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2021-11386

Türkel, R. (2023). Evaluation on the Impact of Islamic Sciences Accreditation Agency (IAA) Criteria on the Process of Acquiring the 21st Century Competencies. Hitit Theology Journal, 22(1), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.1251971

Vernay, A.L., Cartel, M., & Pinkse, J. (2022). Mainstreaming Business Models for Sustainability in Mature Industries: Leveraging Alternative Institutional Logics for Optimal Distinctiveness. Organization and Environment, 35(3), 414–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221079406

Waruwu, M. (2023). Educational Research Approaches: Qualitative Research Methods, Quantitative Research Methods and Mixed Method Research Methods. Tambusai Education Journal, 7(1), 2896–2910.

Zameer, H., Wang, Y., & Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: Implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119119


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/pjp.v11i1.8673


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 chatreys suci suci Ramadani Yogi


This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA

Published by Institute for Publication, Research, and Community Service of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.