DIGITAL TRANSCENDENT LEADERSHIP: A GROUNDED STUDY ON MADRASAH PRINCIPALS’ STRATEGIC AGILITY IN NAVIGATING THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v13i1.13444
Authors

(1) * Mus Mulyadi   (Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno, Bengkulu)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Saifaldin Idris Onia   (University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study explores the emergence of Digital Transcendent Leadership (DTL) as a novel paradigm for navigating the complexities of the Merdeka (Emancipated) Curriculum within Islamic formal schools (Madrasahs). Employing a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach involving twelve Madrasah principals across Indonesia, the research reveals that strategic agility in faith-based educational contexts is not merely a technical proficiency but a deeply anchored metacognitive process rooted in transcendence. The findings construct the core category of the "Digital-Mursyid," a leadership model that synthesizes technological sophistication (high-tech) with spiritual depth (high-soul). Through the dimension of "Spiritualized Digitalization," leaders transform administrative burdens into forms of theological stewardship (Amanah) and utilize "Cultural Synthesis" to harmonize global digital standards with traditional ethical values (Adab). Theoretically, this research contributes to the decolonization of digital leadership by demonstrating that spiritual stability serves as the primary engine for ethical and agile innovation. Practically, the DTL model offers a theoretical roadmap for educational leaders to remain technologically progressive without compromising their foundational value systems.

Keywords

Digital Transcendent Leadership; Strategic Agility; Digital-Mursyid; Merdeka Curriculum.



Full Text: PDF



References


Akbari, T. T., Putri, D. W., Aruan, D. C., & Nagy, A. S. (2025). Omni-leadership and digital agility: enhancing strategic communication in higher education digital transformation. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 1–19.

Asvio, N., & Kembar, P. (2023). PROBLEMATIKA SEKOLAH DALAM MENGIMPLEMETASIKAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA (IKM) DI MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH NEGERI 2 KOTA BENGKULU. Journal of Primary Education (JPE), 3(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.29300/jpe.v3i2.7082

Asvio, N. S. E. R. J. S. M. W. I. (2023). Kompetensi Guru: Faktor Penghambat Implementasi Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. PRODU: Prokurasi Edukasi - Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 29–45.

Burns, M., Bally, J., Burles, M., Holtslander, L., & Peacock, S. (2022). Constructivist grounded theory or interpretive phenomenology? Methodological choices within specific study contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221077758.

Campbell, P., MacGregor, S., Sum, N., Friesen, S., Sawalhi, R., Conway, J., Andrews, D., Braunberger, D., & Kam, Y. C. (2025). Conceptualising innovation in education: a scoping review of implications for school leadership and change. School Leadership & Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2025.2602874

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE publications Ltd.

Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327.

Deepa, V., Sujatha, R., & Mohan, J. (2022). Unsung voices of technology in school education-findings using the constructivist grounded theory approach. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1.

Friesen, S., Sum, N., Sawalhi, R., MacGregor, S., Campbell, P., Conway, J., Andrews, D., & Penner, A. (2025). The leadership of innovation in education: findings from an environmental scan. School Leadership & Management, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2025.2602008

Fullan, M., Azorín, C., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and school leadership: challenges, opportunities and implications. School Leadership & Management, 44(4), 339–346.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1998). Grounded theory. Strategien Qualitativer Forschung. Bern: Huber, 4.

Hadijah, S., & Ramli, A. (2025). Digital-Collaboration-Based Change Management in the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum within the Framework of Civil Society 5.0. Journal of Islamic Education Students (JIES), 5(2), 440–460.

Katzir, S. (2023). Educational Change in Religious Enclave Communities: Promoting and Enacting Reforms in Boys’ Haredi Schools. University of Haifa (Israel).

Lindqvist, H., & Forsberg, C. (2023). Constructivist grounded theory and educational research: Constructing theories about teachers’ work when analysing relationships between codes. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(2), 200–210.

Mahmutoğlu, C., Celep, C., & Kaya, A. (2025). The impact of school administrators’ influence tactics on teachers’ organizational commitment: the role of learning agility. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1549328.

Montazeri, F. (2022). Hāfiz and the Safavids: Cultural History of a Persianate Controversy. University of California, Berkeley.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2022). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research. European Journal of General Practice, 28(1), 1–12.

Mufti, S., & Bashir, F. (2025). Linking Strategic Leadership to Faculty Performance: A Sequential Mediated Model of Organizational and Employee Agility. Journal of Business & Economics, 17(1), 16–32.

Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173.

Novita, M. (2025). CONTEXTUAL LEARNING MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SCIENCE COMPETENCE AT MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH IN BUNGO REGENCY. Epigram, 22(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v22i2.8050

Novita, M., Madyan, M., & Sukatin, S. (2021). The Framework of Islamic Educational Management to Improve Quality of Graduates. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 6(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v6i2.5657

Rademaker, T., Klingenberg, I., & Süß, S. (2025). Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 429–494.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.

Staab, P., & Sorg, C. (2025). The rise of digital eco-technocracy: Ecological crisis, digital innovation and legitimacy in the adaptive society. European Journal of Social Theory, 28(4), 605–624.

Vanlommel, K., Van Den Boom-muilenburg, S. N., & Kikken, E. (2025). School leadership during disruptive change: an emotional and relational practice. School Leadership & Management, 45(1), 125–147.

Willermark, S., Gellerstedt, M., & Nilsson, P. (2024). Surviving or thriving? Exploring school leaders’ perception of initiated digital transformation. School Leadership & Management, 44(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2282618


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/pjp.v13i1.13444


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mus Mulyadi, Saifaldin Idris Onia


This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA

Published by Institute for Publication, Research, and Community Service of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.