WRITTEN GRAMMAR FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ WRITING WITH VISUAL LEARNING STYLE

Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v5i1.215



Abstract

This research was intended to measure the effectiveness in the students’ writing achievement by using note-written and marked-written grammar feedback on students’ writing with visual learning styles. Based on the result of the computation, that in the experimental group using note-written grammar feedback, mean score for visual learning style is 78.78, while in the control group the visual learning style is 69.25. It means that there is a difference means score between experimental group and control group. Based on the statistical computation, the F value of Corrected Model was .519. It > .05 with the level of confidence 95% (α = .05). It means that was not valid. Further, the F value of Intercept was .000. It < .05 with the level of confidence 95% (α = .05). It means the dependent variable was not influenced by the independent variable. On the other words, the intercept was significant. While the effect of note-written grammar feedback to posttest score is .388. It > .05 with the level of confidence 95% (α = .05). It means that there is no a significance of note-written grammar feedback in students’ writing. Furthermore, for the technique on learning style was .347> .05 with the level of confidence 95% (α = .05). It means that there was no a significance of written grammar feedback techniques and students’ learning style on the students’ writing.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alexander, L. G. (1998). Longman English Grammar for Intermediate Students. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.

Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont: Vicki Knight.

Baharun, H. (2015). Penerapan Pembelajaran Active Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Pedagogik, 1(1), 34–46.

Baskervill, W. M., & Sewell, J. W. (2004). An English Grammar. Washington: Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tenn.

Biber, D. (2011). The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1-English and L2-Writing Development: A Meta-Analysis. ETS, 11(5): 1-99.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Edition). San Fransisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd Edition). San Fransisco: Pearson Education , Inc.

Coulmas, F. (2013). Writing Systems: An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Felder, R.M. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (1): 21–31.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools – A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd Edition). Oxford: Pearson Education Limited.

Keefe, J. W. (1979). Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Lainuddin, M. (2013). The Effect of Giving Feedback to Students' Writing. SMU Shalahuddin, Malang.

Latief, M. A. (2012). Research Methods on Language Learning an Introduction. Malang: UM Press.

Pan, Y. 2010. The Effect of Teacher Error Feedback on The Accuracy Of EFL Student Writing. TEFLIN Journal, 21(1): 57-77.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners’ Writing Development. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Art, 12(1): 7-17.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper and Row.

Telçeker, H. (2010). The Effect of Oral and Written Teacher Feedback on Students’ Revisions in a Process-Oriented EFL Writing Class. TESL Reporter, 43(1): 31-49.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/pjp.v5i1.215


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Bradhiansyah Tri Suryanto


This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA

Published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.