IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPERATIONAL CURRICULUM OF SEKOLAH PENGGERAK PROGRAM AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Karimatus Saidah, Ilmawati Fahmi Imron
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v9i1.3557



Abstract

The operational curriculum of Sekolah Penggerak program is part of the Sekolah Penggerak program that the Ministry of Education and Culture has launched. In this curriculum, there are changes in the curriculum structure that impact the preparation of learning plans and the implementation of learning activities in the classroom. Thus, this study aims to determine the perspective of teachers and school principals on the functional curriculum of the Sekolah Penggerak Program, the form of learning planning prepared by the teacher, and the implementation of learning activities in the classroom. The research method used is a qualitative method with data analysis techniques by Miles and Huberman. The results showed that teachers and principals welcomed the operational curriculum of the Sekolah Penggerak Program because it opened up creative space for teachers and schools to develop curriculum according to school needs. Meanwhile, there are formats and terms with the 2013 curriculum in preparing learning plans. Learning activities are carried out separately between subjects in the practical aspect of learning. There is no visible learning innovation because learning activities are limited, so the teacher focuses on strengthening the material.

Keywords

Implementation; Sekolah Penggerak Program; Operational Curriculum.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agus, A. H. (2015). Strategi Pengelolaan Kelas Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1), 1–12.

Akinde, O. A., Harr, D., & Burger, P. (2017). Field Experience: Experiential Learning as Complementary to the Conceptual Learning for International Students in a Graduate Teacher Education Program. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p137

Bahri, S. (2017). Pengembangan Kurikulum Dasar dan Tujuannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 11(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i1.61

Butt, G. (1997). Lesson Planning. NT Learning Curve, 1(8), 33-44.

Dick, C., & Carey, L. (2005). The systemtic Design of Instruction. Pearson.

Hermawan, Y. C., Juliani, W. I., & Widodo, H. (2020). Konsep Kurikulum dan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v10i1.4720

Hidayah, L., & Setyo Widodo, G. (2020). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Dan Lingkungan Kaya Teks Di Sekolah “Studi Asesmen Diri Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Surabaya.” Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v4i2.4289

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002

Jiang, Y., Lee, C.-K. J., Wan, Z. H., & Chen, J. (2021). Stricter Teacher, More Motivated Students? Comparing the Associations Between Teacher Behaviors and Motivational Beliefs of Western and East Asian Learners. Brief Research Report, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564327, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564327

Kamiludin, J. (2021). Pelaksanaan IN House Training (IHT) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dalam Menyusun RPP. Jurnal Pedagogiana, 8(49), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.47601/ajp.57

Kemendikbud. (2002). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang Depdiknas.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud nomor 67 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum SD/MI. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2021). Program Sekolah Penggerak. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kottler, J., & Rathgeber, H. (2006). Our Iceberg is Melting. Penguin Random House.

Krissandi, A. D. S., & Rusmawan, R. (2015). Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7409

Leonard, L. (2016). Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(3), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i3.643

Nadiem, A. M. (2020). Pemaparan program guru dalam peluncuran merdeka belajar episode 5 tentang “Guru Penggerak.” https://youtu.be/X6vP4AkEsLM

Novitasari, N. (2020). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sebagai Upaya Menciptakan Generasi Muda Berdaya Literasi pada Kampung Sinau Kota Malang. Jurnal Akrab, 11(2), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.51495/jurnalakrab.v11i02.348

Nuangchalerm, P. (2021). Instructional Practices of Secondary Teachers and Students During Covid-19 Pandemic. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v8i1.1946

Nurlaila. (2018). Urgensi Perencanaan Pembelajaran dalam Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru. Jurnal Ilmiah Sustainable, 1(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v1i1.900

Satriawan, W., Santika, I. D., & Naim, A. (2019). Guru Penggerak dan Transformasi Sekolah Dalam Kerangka Inkuiri Apresiatif. Jurnal Al-Idarah, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/ 10.24042/alidarah.v11i1.7633.

Sholehah, C. (2020). Childhood Mood Disorders During Pandemic; Learning Management Based on Self Discipline. Managere : Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 2(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.52627/ijeam.v2i3.65

Zamjani, I., Aditomo, A., Pratiwi, I., Solihin, L., Hijriani, I., Utama, B., Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Simatupang, S. M., Djunaedi, F., Amani, N. Z., & Widiaswati, D. (2020). Naskah Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak. Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Kemendikbud.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/pjp.v9i1.3557


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Karimatus Saidah, Ilmawati Fahmi Imron


This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA

Published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.