STUDENT MOTIVATION AND LEARNING OUTCOMES THROUGH ONLINE FLIPPED CLASSROOM BASED ON STUDENT SELF-REGULATION IN COASTAL AREAS

Chusnul Muali, Nur Aisyah, Nurul Faizah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v10i2.5735



Abstract

Most learning motivation research focuses on students' performance with various abilities and skills and still needs to integrate constructive learning technology tools. Therefore, this study answers research questions about differences in stu-dent motivation and learning outcomes using the online flipped classroom based on differences in students' self-regulatory levels. Data was obtained from 108 students in coastal area schools, who were divided into two groups. Students' self-regulative abilities are measured using a four-point Likert scale, and learning outcomes are obtained from multiple-choice questions. The data collection in-strument used resulted from the developing of The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The hypothesis was tested using multivariate analysis of variance to find answers to research questions. The results of this study show higher levels of motivation and learning outcomes in the online flipped classroom group. Furthermore, the research results show the influence of student self-regulation on student motivation and learning outcomes.

Keywords

Learning Outcomes; Online Flipped Classroom; Self-Regulation.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, A., & Omar, M. (2022). Integrated Learning Management During Pandemic. Journal of Research in Educational Management, 1(1), 32–41.

Adinda, D., & Mohib, N. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of eLearning, 18(2), 162-174.

Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The effects of different learning environments on students’ motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 484–501.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, Inc.

D. L. Dinsmore, P. A. Alexander, and S. M. L. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self- regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409.

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.

Kohan N, Arabshahi KS, Mojtahedzadeh R, Abbaszadeh A, R. T., & A, E. A. (2017). Self-directed learning barriers in a virtual environment: A qualitative study. J Adv Med Educ Prof., 5(3), 116–123.

Lalitha T, S. P. (2020). Personalised self-directed learning recommendation system. Proc Comput Sci., 171, 583–592.

Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136(2), 1–12.

Maison, et al. (2019). Learning in Nature Science: Social Implication, Normality of Scientist., Attitudes Towards Investigation of Natural Science, and Interest Adds To Science Learning Time. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 1478–1484.

Mundiri, A., Eka Mahmud, M., Ubaidillah, M., Azizah, N., Zuhro, L., & Hasanah, F. (2021). Learning Agility During Pandemic; Outstanding Strategy in Language Learning by Using Zoom Application. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779, 012066-012072. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012066

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.

Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(3), 847512.

S. Kingir, Y. Tas, G. Gok, S. S. V. (2013). Relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, motivational beliefs, self-regulation and science achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 205–226.

S. Velayutham, & J. M. Aldridge. (2013). Influence of Psychosocial Classroom Environment on students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 507–527.

Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: Integration with self- regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 361–389.

Scribner, P, J. (2015). The Problems of Practice: Bricolage as a Metaphor for Teachers’ Work and Learning. The Albertha Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 295–310.

Shahrebakbaki, M. M. (2015). Relationships between Language Teachers’ Time-management Skills, Creativity, and Burnout: A Mediation Analysis. Alberta Journal of Education Research, 61(1), 20–39.

Slomanson, W. R. (2014). Blended learning: A Flipped Classroom Experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 64(1), 93–102.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1), 82-83.

Yamada, Y., & Hirakawa, M. (2015). A Case Study of Analyzing Logs of LMS in Flipped Classroom. In 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (pp. 374-378).

Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Students' learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers & education, 126, 75-88.


Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.33650/pjp.v10i2.5735


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Chusnul Muali, Nur Aisyah, Nurul Faizah


This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA

Published by Islamic Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia.