Jurnal Kesehatan Nusantara

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Kesehatan Nusantara merupakan jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Kesehatan Universitas Nurul Jadid yang menerima dan menerbitkan artikel penelitian di bidang keperawatan, kebidanan, dan kesehatan.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Kesehatan Nusantara  must follow the focus, scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Plagiarism Checker software. 

The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The articles will be sent to the peer reviewers to get Double-Blind Peer Review Process and will be returned to the authors to revise. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.

The final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering the sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as the thematic issue.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Kesehatan Nusantara is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online and published twice a year (in May and October). This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Health Faculty of Nurul Jadid University, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It, therefore, is important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer-reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

Health Faculty of Nurul Jadid University as the publisher of Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Likewise, the Faculty and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

Editors at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual contents without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Screening Plagiarism Policy

All articles submitted will be screened for plagiarism by Google and Plagiarism Checker.

Publication Frequency

Publishing twice a year in  March and October

Author Guideliness

General Author Guidelines

1. The Manuscript should be written in Indonesian or English and should be original, unpublished and not under reviewed for possible publication in any other journals.
2. The Manuscript may take the form of research, case studies, or literary studies.
3. The manuscript submitted via website: https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/jkn/index
4. The Manuscript should be prepared according to the following author guidelines and Template. The writing template can be downloaded here
5. Submitted manuscripts should have relevance and contribute something to management of Islamic education. The manuscripts should include: 150 words of Abstracts (each in English and Indonesia), Introduction, Methods, Results (findings), Discussion, Conclusion.

Structure of The Manuscripts

The Manuscript that will be submitted in this journal should contain:

1. Information of article: Title: no more than 16 words; Author(s) name is fully writen without any title,  Institution, email address
2. Abstract: The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. The abstract should be presented separately from the article, so it is independent. No more than 250 words, written in both English and Indonesia in one paragraph containing: The research objectives, research methodology, data analysis, and research findings. It is typed using font Book Antiqua (11 pt), single space.
3. Introduction: This section comprises the background, the literature review or the summary of previous relevant studies, the aims of writing the article, and the description of the problem solving and clear objectives of the research, with APA style with 1.2 spacing. Please try to answer at least two questions: (1) why you believe that your research question is such an important to answer; and (2) how other scholars have or have not answered, or how you think your answer will
4. Discussion : In this section you may discuss every aspect of the issue one by one. It is necessary to build argument and to provide original data discussed and compared to research and works of other scholars. The way to discuss an issue here is by combining the data and the discussion. The discussion is highlighted in the title and subtitles of this section. In addition, this section should significantly explore the research findings without redundant and long direct quotation 
5. Findings and Discussion : The findings is presented in full and related with the scope of the research determined before. The findings can be completed with tables, graphs, and/or charts. The tables and pictures are given number and title. The result of data analysis is explained correctly in the article. The discussion part logically explains the findings, associated with the relevant sources (Font Book Antiqua 12 pt Bold).
6. Conclusion : The conclusion contains the short summary of the findings and discussion. Conclusion is the findings in the research that has the answers for the research questions or the objective of the research.
7. References : Containing referenced sources with minimum 80% of books last 10 years issue. The references is written based on American Psychological Association (APA). References and notes should be written alphabetically as follows:

• Bibi, F., Chaudhry, A. G., Awan, E. A., & Tariq, B. (2013). Contribution of Parenting Style in Life Domain of Children. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 12(2), 91–95. (Journal)
• Fauzi, A. (2017). Building Transformative Management Epistemology at Pondok Pesantren Based on Local Wisdom. In Proceedings of the 1 st International Conference on Education and Islamic Culture “Rethinking Islamic Education Toward Cultural Transformation” Faculty of Tarbiyah, Islamic Institute of Nurul Jadid Probolinggo (pp. 199–203). Probolinggo. (Proceeding)
• Munn, P. (1993). Parents and School; Customers, Managers or Partners. London and New York: Routledge. (Book)
• Jessup, H. (1985). Dutch Architectural Visions of the Indonesia Tradition. Muqarnas, No. 3. (Working paper)
• Luqman, A. (1986). Heboh Peninggalan Sunan Kudus. Tempo, 62. (Article from Newspaper)

Online Submission

Already have a Username/Password for Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional?
GO TO LOGIN

Need a Username/Password?
GO TO REGISTRATION

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

Submission Preparation Checklist

Authors who wish to enter the manuscript should pay attention to the points below. If the manuscript does not comply with the terms already listed, it is possible that the text will be returned.

• Submissions have not been published previously, or are under consideration by other journals (or an explanation has not been provided in comments to editors).
• The text must match the style of the journal journaling, and in accordance with the writing rules contained in the Writing Guide, on the Journal About menu.
• Script files in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file formats. (.doc; .docx; .rtf)

Plagiarism

For scanning plagiarism, al-Tanzim uses Google Scholar to track the plagiarism level of the manuscript. To avoid Plagiarism, every submitted manuscript will be screened by Plagiarism checker aplication

Article Processing Charge (APCs)

Article Processing Charges is free, IDR.0.00. Allows people to access the full text versions of the articles.

Article Submission Charge (ASCs)

Article Submission Charges in Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional is Free, IDR.0.00.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish in Jurnal Kesehatan Nasional agree to the following terms:

• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)